Hindi nagbibigay ng serbisyo ang XM sa mga residente ng Estados Unidos.

Lawyer who tipped SEC can't claim whistleblower award, US appeals court rules



<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head><title>Lawyer who tipped SEC can't claim whistleblower award, US appeals court rules</title></head><body>

By Mike Scarcella

Aug 16 (Reuters) -A corporate attorney who tipped off the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to possible fraud involving his company was properly denied eligibility to collect a whistleblower award, an appeals court said in a ruling unsealed on Friday.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit said the attorney, who was not named, failed to meet SEC requirements for whistleblower information to be "original" and not derived from legal representation of a client.

There is a limited exception to the requirements under which lawyers could claim an SEC award if their disclosure was made in accordance with state professional attorney conduct rules and in a client's interest. The D.C. Circuit found the exception did not apply.

The three-judge panel upheld a commission order denying a cut of the unspecified award.

In a statement, attorneys for the unnamed lawyer said their client “did the right thing in blowing the whistle” and said he “put a stop to a massive securities fraud.”

The SEC declined to comment.

Much of the litigation was conducted under seal, shielding the names of the attorney and his company.

The D.C. Circuit said the underlying tip was related to a 2018 enforcement action in Florida against two individuals, the lawyer’s company and other entities. Sanctions levied by the SEC in the case totaled tens of millions of dollars.

Whistleblower awards for attorneys are available only in limited circumstances, the SEC told the appeals court.

The lawyer argued that he acted in his company's interest and provided information to the SEC to prevent it from committing a crime.

The D.C. Circuit disagreed.

“In reporting on the suspected wrongdoing, then, Doe was reporting on his own client,” the court said. “Common sense therefore dictates that Doe could not have reasonably believed that he was acting in his client’s best interest.”

The SEC’s whistleblower program as of last year had doled out nearly $2 billion in awards to about 400 whistleblowers since its creation in 2010, according to the agency.

The largest awards have been worth hundreds of millions of dollars.


The case is John Doe v. Securities and Exchange Commission, U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, No. 23-1044.

For Doe: Tom Cummins and Max Maccoby of Washington Global Law Group

For SEC: William Shirey of SEC


Read more:

Comcast sues US Labor Department to shut down whistleblower case, citing US Supreme Court

US Justice Dept. launches whistleblower program aimed at corporate crime

Why foreign workers are not shielded by federal whistleblower laws

Wall Street criminal enforcer urges whistleblowers to come forward



Reporting by Mike Scarcella

</body></html>

Disclaimer: Ang mga kabilang sa XM Group ay nagbibigay lang ng serbisyo sa pagpapatupad at pag-access sa aming Online Trading Facility, kung saan pinapahintulutan nito ang pagtingin at/o paggamit sa nilalaman na makikita sa website o sa pamamagitan nito, at walang layuning palitan o palawigin ito, at hindi din ito papalitan o papalawigin. Ang naturang pag-access at paggamit ay palaging alinsunod sa: (i) Mga Tuntunin at Kundisyon; (ii) Mga Babala sa Risk; at (iii) Kabuuang Disclaimer. Kaya naman ang naturang nilalaman ay ituturing na pangkalahatang impormasyon lamang. Mangyaring isaalang-alang na ang mga nilalaman ng aming Online Trading Facility ay hindi paglikom, o alok, para magsagawa ng anumang transaksyon sa mga pinansyal na market. Ang pag-trade sa alinmang pinansyal na market ay nagtataglay ng mataas na lebel ng risk sa iyong kapital.

Lahat ng materyales na nakalathala sa aming Online Trading Facility ay nakalaan para sa layuning edukasyonal/pang-impormasyon lamang at hindi naglalaman – at hindi dapat ituring bilang naglalaman – ng payo at rekomendasyon na pangpinansyal, tungkol sa buwis sa pag-i-invest, o pang-trade, o tala ng aming presyo sa pag-trade, o alok para sa, o paglikom ng, transaksyon sa alinmang pinansyal na instrument o hindi ginustong pinansyal na promosyon.

Sa anumang nilalaman na galing sa ikatlong partido, pati na ang mga nilalaman na inihanda ng XM, ang mga naturang opinyon, balita, pananaliksik, pag-analisa, presyo, ibang impormasyon o link sa ibang mga site na makikita sa website na ito ay ibibigay tulad ng nandoon, bilang pangkalahatang komentaryo sa market at hindi ito nagtataglay ng payo sa pag-i-invest. Kung ang alinmang nilalaman nito ay itinuring bilang pananaliksik sa pag-i-invest, kailangan mong isaalang-alang at tanggapin na hindi ito inilaan at inihanda alinsunod sa mga legal na pangangailangan na idinisenyo para maisulong ang pagsasarili ng pananaliksik sa pag-i-invest, at dahil dito ituturing ito na komunikasyon sa marketing sa ilalim ng mga kaugnay na batas at regulasyon. Mangyaring siguruhin na nabasa at naintindihan mo ang aming Notipikasyon sa Hindi Independyenteng Pananaliksik sa Pag-i-invest at Babala sa Risk na may kinalaman sa impormasyong nakalagay sa itaas, na maa-access dito.

Babala sa Risk: Maaaring malugi ang iyong kapital. Maaaring hindi nababagay sa lahat ang mga produktong naka-leverage. Mangyaring isaalang-alang ang aming Pahayag sa Risk.