Lawyer sues Morgan & Morgan over firm's 'deceptive' ad practices
By Sara Merken
July 18 (Reuters) -An Arkansas lawyer has sued Morgan & Morgan, a national plaintiffs law firm known for its energetic marketing, accusing it of unfair and deceptive advertising practices that harm his own business.
Morgan & Morgan runs advertisements with "dramatizations" and testimonials from clients in violation of state attorney professional conduct rules, personal injury lawyer Jody Shackelford alleged in the lawsuit filed on Wednesday in Arkansas federal court.
The Arkansas television ads include disclaimers such as "DRAMATIZATION" and "ACTUAL CLIENT," which mislead consumers by falsely suggesting that they comply with the local rules, the complaint said.
Orlando, Florida-based Morgan & Morgan's broadcast of the commercials also violated Federal Communications Commission rules preventing false or misleading advertising, the complaint said.
Morgan & Morgan has as a result retained Arkansas clients, "diverting potential clients from Arkansas attorneys and law firms" and giving the firm an unfair advantage, Shackelford said in the lawsuit.
Morgan & Morgan spokesperson Dave Falkenstein said in a statement the lawsuit "is meritless and will be dismissed."
Shackelford, who works at a two-lawyer firm, told Reuters it can be difficult to compete with such a big firm, which he said is "stepping on the little guys."
Morgan & Morgan spent nearly $240 million in TV ads in 2023, and $40.3 million in digital ads that year, according to a February blog post from the U.S. Chamber of Commerce Institute for Legal Reform that cited data from advertisement analytics firms Tunnl and Sensor Tower.
Micah Buchdahl, a New Jersey-based ethics attorney who focuses on law firm marketing and advertising, said Morgan & Morgan's marketing approach has affected personal injury and other law firms around the country. In some cases they have had to "really advertise heavily" for the first time to compete against the firm, he said.
Morgan & Morgan faced a lawsuit in Pennsylvania in 2017 from personal injury firm that claimed its local ads were misleading consumers about the firm's work in the state. Morgan & Morgan asked the court to dismiss the lawsuit, and the case was dropped in 2018.
The case is Shackelford v. Morgan & Morgan Complex Litigation Service PA, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas, No. 3:24-cv-00123-JM
For Shackelford: Pro se
For Morgan & Morgan: Not immediately known
Reporting by Sara Merken
Pinakabagong Balita
Disclaimer: Ang mga kabilang sa XM Group ay nagbibigay lang ng serbisyo sa pagpapatupad at pag-access sa aming Online Trading Facility, kung saan pinapahintulutan nito ang pagtingin at/o paggamit sa nilalaman na makikita sa website o sa pamamagitan nito, at walang layuning palitan o palawigin ito, at hindi din ito papalitan o papalawigin. Ang naturang pag-access at paggamit ay palaging alinsunod sa: (i) Mga Tuntunin at Kundisyon; (ii) Mga Babala sa Risk; at (iii) Kabuuang Disclaimer. Kaya naman ang naturang nilalaman ay ituturing na pangkalahatang impormasyon lamang. Mangyaring isaalang-alang na ang mga nilalaman ng aming Online Trading Facility ay hindi paglikom, o alok, para magsagawa ng anumang transaksyon sa mga pinansyal na market. Ang pag-trade sa alinmang pinansyal na market ay nagtataglay ng mataas na lebel ng risk sa iyong kapital.
Lahat ng materyales na nakalathala sa aming Online Trading Facility ay nakalaan para sa layuning edukasyonal/pang-impormasyon lamang at hindi naglalaman – at hindi dapat ituring bilang naglalaman – ng payo at rekomendasyon na pangpinansyal, tungkol sa buwis sa pag-i-invest, o pang-trade, o tala ng aming presyo sa pag-trade, o alok para sa, o paglikom ng, transaksyon sa alinmang pinansyal na instrument o hindi ginustong pinansyal na promosyon.
Sa anumang nilalaman na galing sa ikatlong partido, pati na ang mga nilalaman na inihanda ng XM, ang mga naturang opinyon, balita, pananaliksik, pag-analisa, presyo, ibang impormasyon o link sa ibang mga site na makikita sa website na ito ay ibibigay tulad ng nandoon, bilang pangkalahatang komentaryo sa market at hindi ito nagtataglay ng payo sa pag-i-invest. Kung ang alinmang nilalaman nito ay itinuring bilang pananaliksik sa pag-i-invest, kailangan mong isaalang-alang at tanggapin na hindi ito inilaan at inihanda alinsunod sa mga legal na pangangailangan na idinisenyo para maisulong ang pagsasarili ng pananaliksik sa pag-i-invest, at dahil dito ituturing ito na komunikasyon sa marketing sa ilalim ng mga kaugnay na batas at regulasyon. Mangyaring siguruhin na nabasa at naintindihan mo ang aming Notipikasyon sa Hindi Independyenteng Pananaliksik sa Pag-i-invest at Babala sa Risk na may kinalaman sa impormasyong nakalagay sa itaas, na maa-access dito.
