Law firm defends work in $5.6 bln card fee case after disclosing fake claims
By Mike Scarcella
June 7 (Reuters) -A law firm that earlier said it unknowingly submitted fake claims as part of a $5.6 billion settlement with Visa and MasterCard told a U.S. judge on Thursday that other parties had also submitted fraudulent material in the case.
Responding to a request for more information from the Brooklyn judge overseeing the antitrust case, New York-founded Milberg Coleman Bryson Phillips Grossman said it had terminated its relationship with nearly 2,000 merchant plaintiffs since disclosing the false claims last month.
The firm said it was being singled out unfairly and that other companies “and/or” law firms had also submitted fraudulent claims in the case.
“It is a very unfortunate part of the settlement process, particularly in a settlement as large as this one,” Milberg's filing said, without naming any company or firm.
Visa and Mastercard agreed to the $5.6 billion settlement in 2018 to resolve claims from millions of merchants who said they had overpaid credit and debit card fees. Milberg did not help craft the settlement but had sought part of the fund for its clients.
Representatives from Milberg and attorneys for the retailer class did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Visa and Mastercard denied any wrongdoing in agreeing to settle.
Last month, attorneys for the class of 12 million retailers said they learned about fraudulent claims submitted by Milberg and raised their concerns to the court.
“If Milberg knows of fraud, it should alert class counsel or the court,” the class attorneys wrote in Thursday's filing, jointly submitted with Milberg.
Milberg in its May response said it had withdrawn dozens of "proofs of authorization" that are part of the claims process for clients. The firm blamed a third-party “referral” source, and the firm said it was no longer pursuing any new clients in the Visa and Mastercard case.
The class attorneys at plaintiffs’ firms Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd and Robins Kaplan said the court should consider punishing Milberg, or referring it to the U.S. Justice Department.
Milberg said it was making an effort to be “fully transparent” with the class attorneys. It said the idea of punishing the firm or referring it to law enforcement was “absurd.”
The case is Payment Card Interchange Fee and Merchant Discount Antitrust Litigation, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York, 1:05-md-01720-MKB-VMS.
Read more:
US judge orders probe of Novartis $30 mln settlement claims process
Law firm says fake claims were submitted in $5.6 bln credit card settlement
Scammers flood US class action settlements with fraudulent claims
Reporting by Mike Scarcella
Mga Kaugnay na Asset
Pinakabagong Balita
Disclaimer: Ang mga kabilang sa XM Group ay nagbibigay lang ng serbisyo sa pagpapatupad at pag-access sa aming Online Trading Facility, kung saan pinapahintulutan nito ang pagtingin at/o paggamit sa nilalaman na makikita sa website o sa pamamagitan nito, at walang layuning palitan o palawigin ito, at hindi din ito papalitan o papalawigin. Ang naturang pag-access at paggamit ay palaging alinsunod sa: (i) Mga Tuntunin at Kundisyon; (ii) Mga Babala sa Risk; at (iii) Kabuuang Disclaimer. Kaya naman ang naturang nilalaman ay ituturing na pangkalahatang impormasyon lamang. Mangyaring isaalang-alang na ang mga nilalaman ng aming Online Trading Facility ay hindi paglikom, o alok, para magsagawa ng anumang transaksyon sa mga pinansyal na market. Ang pag-trade sa alinmang pinansyal na market ay nagtataglay ng mataas na lebel ng risk sa iyong kapital.
Lahat ng materyales na nakalathala sa aming Online Trading Facility ay nakalaan para sa layuning edukasyonal/pang-impormasyon lamang at hindi naglalaman – at hindi dapat ituring bilang naglalaman – ng payo at rekomendasyon na pangpinansyal, tungkol sa buwis sa pag-i-invest, o pang-trade, o tala ng aming presyo sa pag-trade, o alok para sa, o paglikom ng, transaksyon sa alinmang pinansyal na instrument o hindi ginustong pinansyal na promosyon.
Sa anumang nilalaman na galing sa ikatlong partido, pati na ang mga nilalaman na inihanda ng XM, ang mga naturang opinyon, balita, pananaliksik, pag-analisa, presyo, ibang impormasyon o link sa ibang mga site na makikita sa website na ito ay ibibigay tulad ng nandoon, bilang pangkalahatang komentaryo sa market at hindi ito nagtataglay ng payo sa pag-i-invest. Kung ang alinmang nilalaman nito ay itinuring bilang pananaliksik sa pag-i-invest, kailangan mong isaalang-alang at tanggapin na hindi ito inilaan at inihanda alinsunod sa mga legal na pangangailangan na idinisenyo para maisulong ang pagsasarili ng pananaliksik sa pag-i-invest, at dahil dito ituturing ito na komunikasyon sa marketing sa ilalim ng mga kaugnay na batas at regulasyon. Mangyaring siguruhin na nabasa at naintindihan mo ang aming Notipikasyon sa Hindi Independyenteng Pananaliksik sa Pag-i-invest at Babala sa Risk na may kinalaman sa impormasyong nakalagay sa itaas, na maa-access dito.
