Google defeats digital maps antitrust case in US court
Adds comment from Google, plaintiffs in paras 5 and 6
By Mike Scarcella
July 16 (Reuters) -Alphabet's GOOGL.O Google won a ruling in California federal court on Monday dismissing a proposed class action claiming it too tightly restricted how customers use its digital-mapping products, causing them to pay higher prices.
U.S. District Judge Richard Seeborg in San Francisco rejected claims by the plaintiffs, including marketing company Dream Big Media, that Google was unlawfully prohibiting developers from using Google and non-Google data in their maps.
The plaintiffs sued in 2022 over Google technology that lets customers feature a Google map and other related information about places and routes onto a third-party website or app.
Seeborg’s ruling said the plaintiffs had not presented enough facts to persuade him that Google was monopolizing mapping services. He dismissed the case with prejudice, which means it cannot be refiled.
Google in a statement called the lawsuit "baseless" and said it welcomed the court's ruling.
The plaintiffs said they were "exploring options to appeal the decision."The plaintiff class included businesses, application developers and individual purchasers of Google mapping products.
The lawsuit asserted that map customers should be allowed to “mix and match,” using some Google mapping products and competitor data at the same time for interactive features on websites and other applications.
Google countered that the plaintiffs were not reading the company’s mapping terms of service correctly. A customer cannot “link” a Google map to a non-Google one, Google told the court in a filing.
The plaintiffs had not shown “even a single instance” of the company “preventing a developer from using or displaying non-Google content with or near a Google Map,” according to Google.
Google faces other lawsuits over its practices and products, including its search business and digital advertising suite. Google has denied allegations from the U.S. government and others in those cases.
The case is Dream Big Media Inc v. Alphabet Inc and Google LLC, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, No. 3:22-cv-02314.
For plaintiffs: Justin Nematzadeh of Nematzadeh PLLC; John G. Balestriere of Balestriere Fariello; and Mario Simonyan of ESQGo PC
For defendant: David Kiernan and Catherine Zeng of Jones Day
Read more:
Google execs Pichai, Brin must sit for questioning in digital ads lawsuit
Google loses bid to end US antitrust case over digital advertising
Google defends app store, fighting Epic Games' bid for major reforms
US judge questions Google, DOJ in market power trial closing
Reporting by Mike Scarcella
Mga Kaugnay na Asset
Pinakabagong Balita
Disclaimer: Ang mga kabilang sa XM Group ay nagbibigay lang ng serbisyo sa pagpapatupad at pag-access sa aming Online Trading Facility, kung saan pinapahintulutan nito ang pagtingin at/o paggamit sa nilalaman na makikita sa website o sa pamamagitan nito, at walang layuning palitan o palawigin ito, at hindi din ito papalitan o papalawigin. Ang naturang pag-access at paggamit ay palaging alinsunod sa: (i) Mga Tuntunin at Kundisyon; (ii) Mga Babala sa Risk; at (iii) Kabuuang Disclaimer. Kaya naman ang naturang nilalaman ay ituturing na pangkalahatang impormasyon lamang. Mangyaring isaalang-alang na ang mga nilalaman ng aming Online Trading Facility ay hindi paglikom, o alok, para magsagawa ng anumang transaksyon sa mga pinansyal na market. Ang pag-trade sa alinmang pinansyal na market ay nagtataglay ng mataas na lebel ng risk sa iyong kapital.
Lahat ng materyales na nakalathala sa aming Online Trading Facility ay nakalaan para sa layuning edukasyonal/pang-impormasyon lamang at hindi naglalaman – at hindi dapat ituring bilang naglalaman – ng payo at rekomendasyon na pangpinansyal, tungkol sa buwis sa pag-i-invest, o pang-trade, o tala ng aming presyo sa pag-trade, o alok para sa, o paglikom ng, transaksyon sa alinmang pinansyal na instrument o hindi ginustong pinansyal na promosyon.
Sa anumang nilalaman na galing sa ikatlong partido, pati na ang mga nilalaman na inihanda ng XM, ang mga naturang opinyon, balita, pananaliksik, pag-analisa, presyo, ibang impormasyon o link sa ibang mga site na makikita sa website na ito ay ibibigay tulad ng nandoon, bilang pangkalahatang komentaryo sa market at hindi ito nagtataglay ng payo sa pag-i-invest. Kung ang alinmang nilalaman nito ay itinuring bilang pananaliksik sa pag-i-invest, kailangan mong isaalang-alang at tanggapin na hindi ito inilaan at inihanda alinsunod sa mga legal na pangangailangan na idinisenyo para maisulong ang pagsasarili ng pananaliksik sa pag-i-invest, at dahil dito ituturing ito na komunikasyon sa marketing sa ilalim ng mga kaugnay na batas at regulasyon. Mangyaring siguruhin na nabasa at naintindihan mo ang aming Notipikasyon sa Hindi Independyenteng Pananaliksik sa Pag-i-invest at Babala sa Risk na may kinalaman sa impormasyong nakalagay sa itaas, na maa-access dito.
