China's PwC slap may yet pack a punch
The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are his own. Refiles to add dropped words in fifth paragraph and to fix hyperlink in first paragraph.
By Chan Ka Sing
HONG KONG, Aug 22 (Reuters Breakingviews) -PricewaterhouseCoopers can finally start to think about putting its involvement in the China Evergrande 3333.HK scandal behind it. The auditor's China unit may soon be given a record fine and a six-month ban, the Financial Times reported on Thursday, citing multiple PwC clients. While that'll sting, the regulatory slap looks designed to punish rather than kill. It may yet pack more of a punch.
The sanction would bar PwC from signing off any business for half a year - worse than the three months in the sin bin the Ministry of Finance handed to Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu’s Beijing office last year. Granted, Big Four rivals EY and KPMG - and Deloitte - would be likely to try to take advantage of it by poaching customers. But PwC has assured its clients that a ban would only stop them from certifying audits, not from preparing them, per the FT. So come March 2025, it would be back to business as usual.
That may sound like Beijing is trying to ensure that sufficient competition in the accounting sector endures while also showing a lack of tolerance for wrongdoing. PwC signed off on Evergrande earnings that the China Securities Regulatory Commission determined in May overstated the property developer's revenue by $78 billion in 2019 and 2020.
Hobbling the market leader, though, doesn't stop at six months. State-owned enterprises are often not allowed to hire auditors for three years after a ban.
That'll give smaller local auditors a chance to grow. Chinese authorities have been urging state heavyweights to phase out using the Big Four on concerns over data security, Bloomberg reported in February last year, citing unidentified sources.
It won't be a quick process. Local accountants are not ready to fill the void, given China Inc’s extensive business interests overseas and the complexity of auditing Chinese firms’ offshore units. That EY and KPMG have snapped up over half of PwC’s corporate client exodus, per Reuters, indicates how difficult sidelining the Big Four currently is.
Bank of China 601988.SS, 3988.HK, for instance, this week said it is ditching PwC for EY. Yet in a sign that local players are slowly making inroads, Caixin, a magazine, reported that the state bank has also appointed local firm BDO China Shu Lun Pan as a “secondary auditor”.
Chinese rules stipulate that state-owned firms should not employ the same accountant for more than eight consecutive years. The next time the auditor merry-go-round starts, the Big Four may well be facing off against the likes of BDO, too.
CONTEXT NEWS
PwC China has told clients it expects to receive a six-month ban from Chinese authorities over its audit of collapsed property developer China Evergrande, the Financial Times reported on Aug. 22, citing multiple clients. The punishment could start as early as next month, and a record fine is also possible, the report added.
Chinese authorities have urged state-owned firms to phase out using the four biggest international accounting firms, signaling concerns about data security, Bloomberg reported in February 2023.
Graphic: PwC revenue in Asia Pacific is holding steady https://reut.rs/4duazoL
Editing by Una Galani and Aditya Srivastav
Pinakabagong Balita
Disclaimer: Ang mga kabilang sa XM Group ay nagbibigay lang ng serbisyo sa pagpapatupad at pag-access sa aming Online Trading Facility, kung saan pinapahintulutan nito ang pagtingin at/o paggamit sa nilalaman na makikita sa website o sa pamamagitan nito, at walang layuning palitan o palawigin ito, at hindi din ito papalitan o papalawigin. Ang naturang pag-access at paggamit ay palaging alinsunod sa: (i) Mga Tuntunin at Kundisyon; (ii) Mga Babala sa Risk; at (iii) Kabuuang Disclaimer. Kaya naman ang naturang nilalaman ay ituturing na pangkalahatang impormasyon lamang. Mangyaring isaalang-alang na ang mga nilalaman ng aming Online Trading Facility ay hindi paglikom, o alok, para magsagawa ng anumang transaksyon sa mga pinansyal na market. Ang pag-trade sa alinmang pinansyal na market ay nagtataglay ng mataas na lebel ng risk sa iyong kapital.
Lahat ng materyales na nakalathala sa aming Online Trading Facility ay nakalaan para sa layuning edukasyonal/pang-impormasyon lamang at hindi naglalaman – at hindi dapat ituring bilang naglalaman – ng payo at rekomendasyon na pangpinansyal, tungkol sa buwis sa pag-i-invest, o pang-trade, o tala ng aming presyo sa pag-trade, o alok para sa, o paglikom ng, transaksyon sa alinmang pinansyal na instrument o hindi ginustong pinansyal na promosyon.
Sa anumang nilalaman na galing sa ikatlong partido, pati na ang mga nilalaman na inihanda ng XM, ang mga naturang opinyon, balita, pananaliksik, pag-analisa, presyo, ibang impormasyon o link sa ibang mga site na makikita sa website na ito ay ibibigay tulad ng nandoon, bilang pangkalahatang komentaryo sa market at hindi ito nagtataglay ng payo sa pag-i-invest. Kung ang alinmang nilalaman nito ay itinuring bilang pananaliksik sa pag-i-invest, kailangan mong isaalang-alang at tanggapin na hindi ito inilaan at inihanda alinsunod sa mga legal na pangangailangan na idinisenyo para maisulong ang pagsasarili ng pananaliksik sa pag-i-invest, at dahil dito ituturing ito na komunikasyon sa marketing sa ilalim ng mga kaugnay na batas at regulasyon. Mangyaring siguruhin na nabasa at naintindihan mo ang aming Notipikasyon sa Hindi Independyenteng Pananaliksik sa Pag-i-invest at Babala sa Risk na may kinalaman sa impormasyong nakalagay sa itaas, na maa-access dito.
