Hindi nagbibigay ng serbisyo ang XM sa mga residente ng Estados Unidos.

3M, Corteva, Chemours hit with class action over 'forever chemicals' in carpet



<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head><title>3M, Corteva, Chemours hit with class action over 'forever chemicals' in carpet</title></head><body>

By Brendan Pierson

Aug 30 (Reuters) -3M MMM.N, Corteva CTVA.N and Chemours CC.N were hit with a class action lawsuit on Friday accusing them of covering up the health risks of so-called "forever chemicals" used in carpets and rugs nationwide.

The lawsuit, filed in Minnesota federal court, seeks to represent a class of everyone in the United States who bought and installed carpets before 2020 in buildings they own. It alleges that per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, or PFAS, made by the defendants, were used in "virtually all" carpets up to that time for stain and water resistance.

The lawsuit is seeking economic damages to remove and replace contaminated carpets, as well as punitive damages, but does not include personal injury claims.

It accuses the companies of violating the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), a federal law originally targeting organized crime that also allows civil claims over alleged conspiracies. It also includes numerous claims under state consumer protection laws, and common law claims of nuisance, failure to warn and design defect.

"As the science and technology of PFAS, societal and regulatory expectations, and our expectations of ourselves have evolved, so has how we manage PFAS," 3M said in a statement. "3M will address PFAS litigation by defending itself in court or through negotiated resolutions, all as appropriate."

Corteva and Chemours, which are both spinoffs of DuPont DD.N, did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

PFAS are a family of thousands of chemicals used in consumer and commercial products like firefighting foams, nonstick pans and stain resistant fabrics. They have been linked to cancer and other health concerns and are often called forever chemicals because they do not easily break down in the human body or the environment.

Friday's lawsuit says that DuPont learned as early as the 1950s that PFAS in its Teflon non-stick products were toxic, but kept the knowledge from the public, and that the defendants continued working to cover up the risks. 3M for years secretly paid a toxicology professor to review articles submitted to academic journals and keep research about the dangers of PFAS from being published, it said.

The United States has recently tightened regulation of PFAS, unveiling new standards for contamination in drinking water and requiring some PFAS contamination to be cleaned up under the federal Superfund program for hazardous sites.

Thousands of lawsuits have been filed in recent years against manufacturers of PFAS and the companies that use the chemicals to create a diverse array of products.

DuPont, Corteva and Chemours last year agreed to pay a combined $1.19 billion to public water systems to resolve claims over PFAS contamination, and 3M agreed to pay $10.3 billion.

The case is Peterson et al v. 3M et al, U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota, No. 0:24-cv-03497.

For plaintiffs: Steve Berman of Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro and others

For defendants: not available


Read more:

US sets first standard to curb 'forever chemicals' from drinking water

US designates PFAS chemicals as Superfund hazardous substances

Chemical makers settle PFAS-related claims for $1.19 billion

3M reaches tentative $10.3 billion deal over US 'forever chemicals' claims


</body></html>

Disclaimer: Ang mga kabilang sa XM Group ay nagbibigay lang ng serbisyo sa pagpapatupad at pag-access sa aming Online Trading Facility, kung saan pinapahintulutan nito ang pagtingin at/o paggamit sa nilalaman na makikita sa website o sa pamamagitan nito, at walang layuning palitan o palawigin ito, at hindi din ito papalitan o papalawigin. Ang naturang pag-access at paggamit ay palaging alinsunod sa: (i) Mga Tuntunin at Kundisyon; (ii) Mga Babala sa Risk; at (iii) Kabuuang Disclaimer. Kaya naman ang naturang nilalaman ay ituturing na pangkalahatang impormasyon lamang. Mangyaring isaalang-alang na ang mga nilalaman ng aming Online Trading Facility ay hindi paglikom, o alok, para magsagawa ng anumang transaksyon sa mga pinansyal na market. Ang pag-trade sa alinmang pinansyal na market ay nagtataglay ng mataas na lebel ng risk sa iyong kapital.

Lahat ng materyales na nakalathala sa aming Online Trading Facility ay nakalaan para sa layuning edukasyonal/pang-impormasyon lamang at hindi naglalaman – at hindi dapat ituring bilang naglalaman – ng payo at rekomendasyon na pangpinansyal, tungkol sa buwis sa pag-i-invest, o pang-trade, o tala ng aming presyo sa pag-trade, o alok para sa, o paglikom ng, transaksyon sa alinmang pinansyal na instrument o hindi ginustong pinansyal na promosyon.

Sa anumang nilalaman na galing sa ikatlong partido, pati na ang mga nilalaman na inihanda ng XM, ang mga naturang opinyon, balita, pananaliksik, pag-analisa, presyo, ibang impormasyon o link sa ibang mga site na makikita sa website na ito ay ibibigay tulad ng nandoon, bilang pangkalahatang komentaryo sa market at hindi ito nagtataglay ng payo sa pag-i-invest. Kung ang alinmang nilalaman nito ay itinuring bilang pananaliksik sa pag-i-invest, kailangan mong isaalang-alang at tanggapin na hindi ito inilaan at inihanda alinsunod sa mga legal na pangangailangan na idinisenyo para maisulong ang pagsasarili ng pananaliksik sa pag-i-invest, at dahil dito ituturing ito na komunikasyon sa marketing sa ilalim ng mga kaugnay na batas at regulasyon. Mangyaring siguruhin na nabasa at naintindihan mo ang aming Notipikasyon sa Hindi Independyenteng Pananaliksik sa Pag-i-invest at Babala sa Risk na may kinalaman sa impormasyong nakalagay sa itaas, na maa-access dito.

Babala sa Risk: Maaaring malugi ang iyong kapital. Maaaring hindi nababagay sa lahat ang mga produktong naka-leverage. Mangyaring isaalang-alang ang aming Pahayag sa Risk.