Vanguard bullish on proxy votes for the masses: Ross Kerber
The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters. This column is part of the weekly Reuters Sustainable Finance newsletter, which you can sign up for here
By Ross Kerber
Sept 17 (Reuters) -Only 2% of Vanguard investors opted in to a pilot program to influence their funds' proxy votes this year, the Pennsylvania-based asset manager said, a low rate I thought might suggest its clients don't care about corporate elections.
Not so, said John Galloway, Vanguard's global head of investment stewardship. The paltry rate reflected the challenges of reaching a vast customer base through intermediaries like brokerage firms, Galloway told me and a group of other business journalists on Monday.
"We're committed to bringing this to scale," Galloway said on a video call. He said to expect new pilot programs in 2025 as his team works out technical solutions to communications problems. Eventually Vanguard aims to offer proxy voting options to all its equity index products, which account for $6.6 trillion of its $9.7 trillion of assets under management.
Traditionally individual retail investors only vote about 30% of the shares they own. That should be the natural rate for Vanguard's own investors as well, Galloway said. "We're pretty bullish," he said.
Putting more proxy voting power in the hands of investors sounds great in theory. But so far experiments by Vanguard, BlackRock BLK.N and others have had little if any impact on corporate election outcomes, said Bruce Goldfarb, president of proxy solicitor Okapi Partners.
Investors, Goldfarb said, may be content to leave the process to their asset managers. While there was a lot of early interest, "I think some of that momentum has slowed as retail investors realize it's a lot of work to vote their shares," he said.
Corporate elections have drawn increased attention since the financial crisis as activistsused them to pressure companies on environmental, social and governance matters. Some executives say regulators have given shareholders too much power to shape the agenda of corporate annual meetings.
The rush of assets into low-fee passive funds like the famed Vanguard 500 Index Fund VOO.P has given their managers outsized influence as major owners of top U.S. corporations. Their size has raised concernsfrom many sides, and giving clients more voting power could reduce the heat.
Rather than allowing votes on individual companies, the funds' programs mostly let investors chose the flavor of how their money is voted. For instance last December Vanguard said under its "Investor Choice" programit would allow investors in five funds with a combined $100 billion to choose among four policies to direct how their assets would be voted.
Of the 2 million investors eligible to participate, only about 40,000 signed up, Vanguard now says. Moreover, of that group, 43% selected the option to vote as the Vanguard fund managers would havein any case. Another 30% chose an option to vote as company boards recommended - hardly a rock-the-boat message from the Main Street shareholders Vanguard services.
Galloway said the data was still valuable as an answer to lingering questions about what investors want.
He also noted how, not surprisingly, of the investors in the Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF ESGV.Z who participated in the pilot, 78% chose an ESG-friendly voting policy, more than three times the 24% rate at which all pilot participants went with ESG.
In a report in August Vanguard said it did not back any of 400 shareholder proposals on environmental and social matters. Galloway said that with more direct voting options, ESG-minded fund investors will be able to express their views better.
“Over time, as we bring the Investor Choice program to scale, it will be clear there is not a ‘Vanguard vote’, but rather votes based on choices made by individual investors,” Galloway told me in a followup e-mail.
Vanguard proxy pilot results https://reut.rs/47sevEc
Reporting by Ross Kerber; Editing by David Gregorio
Laatste nieuws
Disclaimer: De entiteiten van de XM Group bieden diensten en toegang tot ons online handelsplatform op basis van uitsluitend-uitvoering, waardoor een persoon de beschikbare content op of via de website kan bekijken en/of gebruiken, zonder dat dit is bedoeld voor wijziging of uitbreiding. Dergelijk(e) toegang en gebruik vallen onder: (i) de algemene voorwaarden; (ii) risicowaarschuwingen; en de (iii) volledige disclaimer. Dergelijke content wordt daarom alleen aangeboden als algemene informatie. Wees u er daarnaast vooral van bewust dat de inhoud op ons online handelsplatform geen verzoek of aanbieding omvat om transacties op de financiële markten uit te voeren. Het beleggen op welke financiële markt dan ook vormt een aanzienlijk risico voor uw vermogen.
Alle materialen die op ons online handelsplatform worden gepubliceerd zijn bedoeld voor educatieve/informatieve doeleinden en omvatten geen – en moeten niet worden beschouwd als het bevatten van – financieel, vermogensbelastings- of handelsadvies en aanbevelingen, of een overzicht van onze handelsprijzen, of een aanbod of aanvraag van een transactie in financiële instrumenten of ongevraagde financiële promoties voor u.
Alle content van derden, alsmede content die is voorbereid door XM, zoals opinies, nieuws, onderzoeken, analyses, prijzen en andere informatie of koppelingen naar externe websites op deze website worden aangeboden op een 'zoals-ze-zijn'-basis, als algemene marktcommentaren, en vormen geen beleggingsadvies. Voor zover dat content wordt beschouwd als beleggingsonderzoek, moet u zich ervan bewust zijn en accepteren dat de content niet bedoeld was en niet is voorbereid in overeenstemming met de wettelijke vereisten die zijn opgesteld om de onafhankelijkheid van beleggingsonderzoek te bevorderen en als zodanig onder de geldende wetgeving en richtlijnen moet worden beschouwd als marketingcommunicatie. Zorg ervoor dat u onze Mededeling over niet-onafhankelijk beleggingsonderzoek en risicowaarschuwing in verband met de voorgaande informatie doorneemt en begrijpt; die kunt u hier lezen.
