New EU antitrust tsar has better tools, harder job
The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.
By George Hay
LONDON, Aug 27 (Reuters Breakingviews) -Europe is about to get a new antitrust supremo. While Ursula von der Leyen will continue as president of the European Commission for the next five years, Denmark’s long-serving competition commissioner Margrethe Vestager will not, according to the Financial Times. Her replacement has sharper regulatory tools, but a harder environment in which to wield them.
Traditionally the key responsibility of DG Comp, as the Directorate-General for Competition is known, has been to crack down on market abuse and anticompetitive behaviour in the 27-state European Union. Vestager, whose tenure has spanned two commissions back to 2014, is seen by Brussels veterans as a hard act to follow. That’s not necessarily because everything she touched turned to gold: her requirement for Apple AAPL.O to fork out 13 billion euros of unpaid tax plus interest to Ireland has suffered legal setbacks, as have tussles with Qualcomm QCOM.O and Fiat. Still, multibillion-euro fines for U.S. Big Tech and the blocking of the 2019 Siemens-Alstom rail merger showed a capacity to protect the integrity of the single market. Her as yet unknown replacement will find that tougher to do.
This isn’t because the new antitrust tsar will lack theoretical heft. Vestager’s drive to penetrate the so-called “walled gardens” of giants like Apple, Alphabet’s GOOGL.O Google and Amazon AMZN.O – which she alleged act anticompetitively to preserve their monopolies – has been partly responsible for handing DG Comp enhanced powers. The Digital Markets Act means Brussels constantly monitors Big Tech “gatekeepers” and can levy fines of up to 20% of global revenue promptly if need be, rather than having to wade through years of investigations for those deemed to have done something wrong. And under the Foreign Subsidies Regulation, EU antitrust enforcers can clamp down on Chinese electric vehicle makers like SAIC Motor even if their cars are built in European factories, on the basis that they may still benefit from Beijing handouts.
Yet the political backdrop in 2024 is markedly different from 2014. Following the pandemic and Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine, which upended European energy markets, Brussels has waived key state aid rules. Richer countries like Germany have filled their boots. Berlin accounted for 52% of the overall 141 billion euros of corporate subsidies granted by member states between March 2022 and June 2023. It’s hard to argue to smaller countries like Ireland and Denmark that the single market currently represents a level playing field.
Click here for an interactive version of the graphic.
The risk, in fact, is that DG Comp’s emphasis on single market integrity starts to look quaint. Influential EU voices see a need to face down Chinese competition, and potentially that of the United States should Donald Trump win the November presidential election. Paradoxically, among the loudest of these is internal market commissioner Thierry Breton, with whom Vestager has been perpetually at odds. He is a relentless lobbyist for robust European industrial policy, arguing it would enable the bloc to be competitive in fields like green energy and tech. If this need to protect national champions becomes a priority in Brussels, a Franco-German heavyweight merger like Siemens-Alstom would be more likely to be approved.
For M&A bankers and acquisitive CEOs sitting in London or New York, there’s opportunity in all this. If Vestager’s replacement were to get shouted down by industrial policy champions, more of their deals might get waved through. Yet a more permissive DG Comp could be a double-edged sword for any company that wants to operate in the EU. It might be a good thing to prevent U.S. Big Tech giants from turning current modest investments in European artificial intelligence startups like France’s Mistral into controlling stakes, and thereby constructing new walled gardens. Yet as with electric vehicles and other green tech, a blanket ban on foreign deals might equally strangle AI innovation.
The Foreign Subsidies Regulation is a similarly difficult tool to wield. It has already been notably unleashed in Bulgaria, where it prompted a subsidiary of Chinese rail group CRRC to withdraw from a tender for train production and maintenance work, presumably because it might have fallen foul of the EU’s focus on subsidy-aided bids. But deploying the tool frequently could lead to Chinese countermeasures that would enrage German exporters to the People’s Republic.
The names currently being mentioned for Vestager’s replacement include Breton himself, which sounds like a mistake given his sympathies to industrial policy. Others, like Dutch climate commissioner Wopke Hoekstra and Belgian justice commissioner Didier Reynders, make more sense. According to Brussels insiders, previous antitrust experience is less important than a willingness to master complex briefs, to have astute political antennae, and most importantly to ally with smaller member states to stop Germany and France shoving everyone else around.
Mario Monti, the former Italian prime minister and competition commissioner between 1999 and 2004, makes for a decent role model. But whoever the EU’s new antitrust supremo is, they will have to show toughness – in a much less hospitable environment.
Follow @gfhay on X
CONTEXT NEWS
Margrethe Vestager will not return for a third term as the European Union’s most powerful antitrust official as the Danish government is set to nominate a different candidate as its European commissioner, the Financial Times reported on Aug. 16.
Officials in Copenhagen told the FT that the Danes would not be choosing Vestager, whose Social Liberal party did poorly in Denmark’s 2022 elections and is no longer part of the ruling coalition.
Graphic: German state aid dwarfs that of EU peers https://reut.rs/4dXgRgn
Graphic: EU antitrust chiefs over the last few decades https://reut.rs/3YVuLvb
Editing by Francesco Guerrera and Oliver Taslic
면책조항: XM Group 회사는 체결 전용 서비스와 온라인 거래 플랫폼에 대한 접근을 제공하여, 개인이 웹사이트에서 또는 웹사이트를 통해 이용 가능한 콘텐츠를 보거나 사용할 수 있도록 허용합니다. 이에 대해 변경하거나 확장할 의도는 없습니다. 이러한 접근 및 사용에는 다음 사항이 항상 적용됩니다: (i) 이용 약관, (ii) 위험 경고, (iii) 완전 면책조항. 따라서, 이러한 콘텐츠는 일반적인 정보에 불과합니다. 특히, 온라인 거래 플랫폼의 콘텐츠는 금융 시장에서의 거래에 대한 권유나 제안이 아닙니다. 금융 시장에서의 거래는 자본에 상당한 위험을 수반합니다.
온라인 거래 플랫폼에 공개된 모든 자료는 교육/정보 목적으로만 제공되며, 금융, 투자세 또는 거래 조언 및 권고, 거래 가격 기록, 금융 상품 또는 원치 않는 금융 프로모션의 거래 제안 또는 권유를 포함하지 않으며, 포함해서도 안됩니다.
이 웹사이트에 포함된 모든 의견, 뉴스, 리서치, 분석, 가격, 기타 정보 또는 제3자 사이트에 대한 링크와 같이 XM이 준비하는 콘텐츠 뿐만 아니라, 제3자 콘텐츠는 일반 시장 논평으로서 "현재" 기준으로 제공되며, 투자 조언으로 여겨지지 않습니다. 모든 콘텐츠가 투자 리서치로 해석되는 경우, 투자 리서치의 독립성을 촉진하기 위해 고안된 법적 요건에 따라 콘텐츠가 의도되지 않았으며, 준비되지 않았다는 점을 인지하고 동의해야 합니다. 따라서, 관련 법률 및 규정에 따른 마케팅 커뮤니케이션이라고 간주됩니다. 여기에서 접근할 수 있는 앞서 언급한 정보에 대한 비독립 투자 리서치 및 위험 경고 알림을 읽고, 이해하시기 바랍니다.
