NY sightseeing bus company’s federal lawsuit against rivals is tossed
By Mike Scarcella
Aug 27 (Reuters) -A U.S. judge on Tuesday threw out Go New York Tours' lawsuit accusing other sightseeing bus companies of conspiring to eliminate competition in the hop-on, hop-off city tourism market.
U.S. District Judge Edgardo Ramos in a ruling dismissed Go New York’s lawsuit against rivals Gray Line New York Tours, Big Bus Tours Group and others because it substantially resembled one that the company lost in 2020.
Both lawsuits alleged a conspiracy among dominant bus tour operators to stop Go New York from competing, allowing the rivals to charge tourists artificially higher prices for “attraction passes,” which give bus riders one-price admission to various popular tourist spots.
Maurice Ross, an attorney for Go New York, on Tuesday said his client planned to appeal and was "very confident" they would win reinstatement. He said a related action filed by Go New York was pending in state court.
Gray Line, Big Bus and lawyers for the two companies did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Both companies denied any wrongdoing.
Go New York owns and operates the TopView branded fleet of more than 40 double-decker, hop-on, hop-off tour buses in New York, a business line it launched in 2012.
Go New York’s antitrust claims in the prior 2019 federal lawsuit were dismissed with prejudice, Ramos said, barring the company from pursuing them for a second time.
Big Bus and Gray Line in a court filing called the latest lawsuit “recycled” and had urged Ramos to dismiss it.
Go New York disputed that its new case, filed in 2023, was barred by the ruling in the prior litigation. Ramos was not persuaded, saying the claims in the new lawsuit were “nearly identical factual allegations” to the prior one.
A new factual detail from Go New York’s 2023 lawsuit focused on a 2020 agreement between Gray Line and Big Bus, in which Gray Line — ending its bus business in New York — said it will sell tickets for Big Bus in exchange for a commission.
Ramos said the factual circumstances of the venture do not support Go New York’s claims that the two companies are monopolizing the tourism market or that the alleged merger violated antitrust law.
But he said Go New York could have another chance to try to persuade him that the arrangement was unlawful.
The case is Go New York Tours Inc v. Gray Line New York Tours Inc, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, No. 1:23-cv-04256.
For Go New York: Maurice Ross and Randall Rasey of Barton
For Gray Line: Ken Edelson of Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati
For Big Bus: Peter Sartorius of Olshan Frome Wolosky
Read more:
NY sightseeing bus company accuses rivals of US antitrust violations
면책조항: XM Group 회사는 체결 전용 서비스와 온라인 거래 플랫폼에 대한 접근을 제공하여, 개인이 웹사이트에서 또는 웹사이트를 통해 이용 가능한 콘텐츠를 보거나 사용할 수 있도록 허용합니다. 이에 대해 변경하거나 확장할 의도는 없습니다. 이러한 접근 및 사용에는 다음 사항이 항상 적용됩니다: (i) 이용 약관, (ii) 위험 경고, (iii) 완전 면책조항. 따라서, 이러한 콘텐츠는 일반적인 정보에 불과합니다. 특히, 온라인 거래 플랫폼의 콘텐츠는 금융 시장에서의 거래에 대한 권유나 제안이 아닙니다. 금융 시장에서의 거래는 자본에 상당한 위험을 수반합니다.
온라인 거래 플랫폼에 공개된 모든 자료는 교육/정보 목적으로만 제공되며, 금융, 투자세 또는 거래 조언 및 권고, 거래 가격 기록, 금융 상품 또는 원치 않는 금융 프로모션의 거래 제안 또는 권유를 포함하지 않으며, 포함해서도 안됩니다.
이 웹사이트에 포함된 모든 의견, 뉴스, 리서치, 분석, 가격, 기타 정보 또는 제3자 사이트에 대한 링크와 같이 XM이 준비하는 콘텐츠 뿐만 아니라, 제3자 콘텐츠는 일반 시장 논평으로서 "현재" 기준으로 제공되며, 투자 조언으로 여겨지지 않습니다. 모든 콘텐츠가 투자 리서치로 해석되는 경우, 투자 리서치의 독립성을 촉진하기 위해 고안된 법적 요건에 따라 콘텐츠가 의도되지 않았으며, 준비되지 않았다는 점을 인지하고 동의해야 합니다. 따라서, 관련 법률 및 규정에 따른 마케팅 커뮤니케이션이라고 간주됩니다. 여기에서 접근할 수 있는 앞서 언급한 정보에 대한 비독립 투자 리서치 및 위험 경고 알림을 읽고, 이해하시기 바랍니다.
