Vanguard bullish on proxy votes for the masses: Ross Kerber
The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters. This column is part of the weekly Reuters Sustainable Finance newsletter, which you can sign up for here
By Ross Kerber
Sept 17 (Reuters) -Only 2% of Vanguard investors opted in to a pilot program to influence their funds' proxy votes this year, the Pennsylvania-based asset manager said, a low rate I thought might suggest its clients don't care about corporate elections.
Not so, said John Galloway, Vanguard's global head of investment stewardship. The paltry rate reflected the challenges of reaching a vast customer base through intermediaries like brokerage firms, Galloway told me and a group of other business journalists on Monday.
"We're committed to bringing this to scale," Galloway said on a video call. He said to expect new pilot programs in 2025 as his team works out technical solutions to communications problems. Eventually Vanguard aims to offer proxy voting options to all its equity index products, which account for $6.6 trillion of its $9.7 trillion of assets under management.
Traditionally individual retail investors only vote about 30% of the shares they own. That should be the natural rate for Vanguard's own investors as well, Galloway said. "We're pretty bullish," he said.
Putting more proxy voting power in the hands of investors sounds great in theory. But so far experiments by Vanguard, BlackRock BLK.N and others have had little if any impact on corporate election outcomes, said Bruce Goldfarb, president of proxy solicitor Okapi Partners.
Investors, Goldfarb said, may be content to leave the process to their asset managers. While there was a lot of early interest, "I think some of that momentum has slowed as retail investors realize it's a lot of work to vote their shares," he said.
Corporate elections have drawn increased attention since the financial crisis as activistsused them to pressure companies on environmental, social and governance matters. Some executives say regulators have given shareholders too much power to shape the agenda of corporate annual meetings.
The rush of assets into low-fee passive funds like the famed Vanguard 500 Index Fund VOO.P has given their managers outsized influence as major owners of top U.S. corporations. Their size has raised concernsfrom many sides, and giving clients more voting power could reduce the heat.
Rather than allowing votes on individual companies, the funds' programs mostly let investors chose the flavor of how their money is voted. For instance last December Vanguard said under its "Investor Choice" programit would allow investors in five funds with a combined $100 billion to choose among four policies to direct how their assets would be voted.
Of the 2 million investors eligible to participate, only about 40,000 signed up, Vanguard now says. Moreover, of that group, 43% selected the option to vote as the Vanguard fund managers would havein any case. Another 30% chose an option to vote as company boards recommended - hardly a rock-the-boat message from the Main Street shareholders Vanguard services.
Galloway said the data was still valuable as an answer to lingering questions about what investors want.
He also noted how, not surprisingly, of the investors in the Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF ESGV.Z who participated in the pilot, 78% chose an ESG-friendly voting policy, more than three times the 24% rate at which all pilot participants went with ESG.
In a report in August Vanguard said it did not back any of 400 shareholder proposals on environmental and social matters. Galloway said that with more direct voting options, ESG-minded fund investors will be able to express their views better.
“Over time, as we bring the Investor Choice program to scale, it will be clear there is not a ‘Vanguard vote’, but rather votes based on choices made by individual investors,” Galloway told me in a followup e-mail.
Vanguard proxy pilot results https://reut.rs/47sevEc
Reporting by Ross Kerber; Editing by David Gregorio
면책조항: XM Group 회사는 체결 전용 서비스와 온라인 거래 플랫폼에 대한 접근을 제공하여, 개인이 웹사이트에서 또는 웹사이트를 통해 이용 가능한 콘텐츠를 보거나 사용할 수 있도록 허용합니다. 이에 대해 변경하거나 확장할 의도는 없습니다. 이러한 접근 및 사용에는 다음 사항이 항상 적용됩니다: (i) 이용 약관, (ii) 위험 경고, (iii) 완전 면책조항. 따라서, 이러한 콘텐츠는 일반적인 정보에 불과합니다. 특히, 온라인 거래 플랫폼의 콘텐츠는 금융 시장에서의 거래에 대한 권유나 제안이 아닙니다. 금융 시장에서의 거래는 자본에 상당한 위험을 수반합니다.
온라인 거래 플랫폼에 공개된 모든 자료는 교육/정보 목적으로만 제공되며, 금융, 투자세 또는 거래 조언 및 권고, 거래 가격 기록, 금융 상품 또는 원치 않는 금융 프로모션의 거래 제안 또는 권유를 포함하지 않으며, 포함해서도 안됩니다.
이 웹사이트에 포함된 모든 의견, 뉴스, 리서치, 분석, 가격, 기타 정보 또는 제3자 사이트에 대한 링크와 같이 XM이 준비하는 콘텐츠 뿐만 아니라, 제3자 콘텐츠는 일반 시장 논평으로서 "현재" 기준으로 제공되며, 투자 조언으로 여겨지지 않습니다. 모든 콘텐츠가 투자 리서치로 해석되는 경우, 투자 리서치의 독립성을 촉진하기 위해 고안된 법적 요건에 따라 콘텐츠가 의도되지 않았으며, 준비되지 않았다는 점을 인지하고 동의해야 합니다. 따라서, 관련 법률 및 규정에 따른 마케팅 커뮤니케이션이라고 간주됩니다. 여기에서 접근할 수 있는 앞서 언급한 정보에 대한 비독립 투자 리서치 및 위험 경고 알림을 읽고, 이해하시기 바랍니다.
