US Nippon Steel rebuff would be cruel and kind
The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.
By Antony Currie
MELBOURNE, Sept 10 (Reuters Breakingviews) -So much for an M&A shortcut. It looks increasingly likely that the Biden administration is about to block Nippon Steel's 5401.T $14.9 billion agreed takeover of United States Steel X.N, Reuters reported in an exclusive on Sept. 5 citing three people with knowledge of the situation. That would be both a cruel and kind blow to the Japanese company's plans to offset challenges at home and beyond.
U.S. presidential candidates Kamala Harris and Donald Trump had already voiced their opposition to the tie-up. Now the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) has, in a letter seen by Reuters, said the deal would damage American steel production, among other things.
Arguably the issues Nippon Steel is trying to tackle should give CFIUS some comfort. Japanese production dominates the $20 billion industrial giant's output, accounting for the vast majority of its 66 million tons a year of steelmaking capacity. But that market is shrinking, pushing Nippon boss Eiji Hashimoto to look abroad. Owning U.S. Steel would give it 20 million tons a year of capacity in a market where demand for high-grade steel is strong and where tariffs of 25% imposed on imports of the metalin 2018 have bolstered profits.
That protectionism would add a partial bulwark to Nippon's earnings against developments in China. The country's property slump has reduced demand but with little change in its 1 billion tons a year of supply. The resulting overcapacity has left the vast majority of mills unprofitable, per Macquarie, and led to a 24% increase in exports in the first half of the year to 54 million tons. Fear of cheap Chinese exportshas prompted Nippon and others to urge Tokyo to impose restrictions, Reuters reported last month.
Such concerns are good reasons for Hashimoto to leave the markets for U.S. Steel's output untouched. Last week Nippon publicly pledged to prioritise American-made metal for U.S. buyers, as well as to put a majority of U.S. citizens on his new subsidiary's board.
If the U.S. does forbid the deal, it'll leave Nippon more exposed to industry challenges and end Hashimoto's hope of quickly hitting his twin goals of 100 billion yen ($700 million)of annualunderlying profit and 100 million tons a year of capacity. But he has other options, not least to build up to 30 million tons of annualcapacity in India with joint venture partner ArcelorMittal MT.LU.
Granted, such projects will take longer. But they also won't come with the whopping 140% premium he's offering for U.S. Steel that would cap the return on investment at some 5%, Breakingviews calculates, or around Nippon's cost of capital, per LSEG. On that score at least, U.S. authorities may be doing Nippon shareholders a favour.
Follow @AntonyMCurrie on X
CONTEXT NEWS
The Biden administration told Nippon Steel in a letter on Aug. 31 that its $14.9 billion acquisition of United States Steel would pose a national security risk by harming the American steel industry, Reuters exclusively reported on Sept. 5. The three people who provided Reuters with the information added that the White House is poised to block the deal.
The two companies were given until Sept. 4 to respond.
Graphic: Nippon Steel-US Steel deal appears to be melting down https://reut.rs/4gk3o47
Editing by Robyn Mak and Aditya Srivastav
면책조항: XM Group 회사는 체결 전용 서비스와 온라인 거래 플랫폼에 대한 접근을 제공하여, 개인이 웹사이트에서 또는 웹사이트를 통해 이용 가능한 콘텐츠를 보거나 사용할 수 있도록 허용합니다. 이에 대해 변경하거나 확장할 의도는 없습니다. 이러한 접근 및 사용에는 다음 사항이 항상 적용됩니다: (i) 이용 약관, (ii) 위험 경고, (iii) 완전 면책조항. 따라서, 이러한 콘텐츠는 일반적인 정보에 불과합니다. 특히, 온라인 거래 플랫폼의 콘텐츠는 금융 시장에서의 거래에 대한 권유나 제안이 아닙니다. 금융 시장에서의 거래는 자본에 상당한 위험을 수반합니다.
온라인 거래 플랫폼에 공개된 모든 자료는 교육/정보 목적으로만 제공되며, 금융, 투자세 또는 거래 조언 및 권고, 거래 가격 기록, 금융 상품 또는 원치 않는 금융 프로모션의 거래 제안 또는 권유를 포함하지 않으며, 포함해서도 안됩니다.
이 웹사이트에 포함된 모든 의견, 뉴스, 리서치, 분석, 가격, 기타 정보 또는 제3자 사이트에 대한 링크와 같이 XM이 준비하는 콘텐츠 뿐만 아니라, 제3자 콘텐츠는 일반 시장 논평으로서 "현재" 기준으로 제공되며, 투자 조언으로 여겨지지 않습니다. 모든 콘텐츠가 투자 리서치로 해석되는 경우, 투자 리서치의 독립성을 촉진하기 위해 고안된 법적 요건에 따라 콘텐츠가 의도되지 않았으며, 준비되지 않았다는 점을 인지하고 동의해야 합니다. 따라서, 관련 법률 및 규정에 따른 마케팅 커뮤니케이션이라고 간주됩니다. 여기에서 접근할 수 있는 앞서 언급한 정보에 대한 비독립 투자 리서치 및 위험 경고 알림을 읽고, 이해하시기 바랍니다.
