XM은(는) 미국 국적의 시민에게 서비스를 제공하지 않습니다.

UK's under-fire water industry braced for regulatory showdown



<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head><title>UK's under-fire water industry braced for regulatory showdown</title></head><body>

Regulator to set out level of permitted bill increases

Companies say bill hikes needed to upgrade infrastructure

Critics argue companies have under-invested for decades

By Sarah Young and Marc Jones

LONDON, July 10 (Reuters) -Britain's under-fire water companies are braced for a reckoning when the industry's regulator on Thursday sets out the level of bill increases they will be permitted, amid public outrage over rising costs and worsening pollution.

The trade-off between price hikes, investment and the environment will test the country's new Labour government, and will illustrate the challenges of managing the privatised water industry, particularly as Thames Water - the biggest supplier - teeters on the brink of collapse.

Water companies have routinely released sewage into rivers and seas, which have made Britain's waters increasingly dirty in the last five years, putting the regulator, Ofwat, under intense pressure to act.

It will publish its initial decision on how much the dozen or so water companies can charge customers for the 2025-2030 period before a final decision in December.

Ofwat said Thames has asked for a 44% increase in bills over the period, excluding inflation, while other providers have sought varying amounts, from Southern Water's 73% hike to Severn Trent's 36% rise and United Utilities' UU.L 25% rise.

The companies say the bill hikes are needed to upgrade ageing pipe networks and help accommodate a growing UK population, and say more frequent droughts and storms have helped cause sewage spills.

But critics of the industry, privatised in 1989, argue that the companies have under-invested for decades while taking out billions of pounds in dividends for shareholders and paying large bonuses to executives.

"We want the water bill payer protected and for essential infrastructure funding to come from investors and lenders who have, until now, profited from pollution," James Wallace, CEO of environmental group River Action UK, said in an emailed response to a Reuters request for comment.

TOUGH LINE

While the government might publicly want the regulator to take a tough line on the water companies, it also needs investors onside as newly elected Prime Minister Keir Starmer seeks tens of billions of pounds of private investment to upgrade infrastructure and revive Britain's economic growth.

The new government is setting up a National Wealth Fund which wants to attract private investment, to the tune of three pounds of private money for every pound from public funds, for clean energy and other projects.

Thames Water, which supplies a quarter of Britain's population, has a 15 billion pound ($19 billion) debt pile and is at risk of collapse next year unless it can convince reluctant shareholders, bond investors plus new investors to stump up more cash.

"Thames is a high profile asset and if Thames isn't dealt with carefully then that could influence investor sentiment," said Nalaka De Silva, head of private market solutions at fund manager abrdn.

"What they need to do is basically convey a message that the policy and regulatory environment is stable."

A Thames collapse could spook investors in the water sector as well as further afield in regulated sectors like energy where Britain also needs investment.

In 2019, Ofwat agreed a plan for average water bills to fall by 12% before inflation over the five years.

But since then, both inflation and interest rates have jumped, making price rises in the next period all but inevitable to allow investors to make returns.

A number of major international funds have already sold out of Thames bonds in recent months, filings data shows, after its parent company Kemble Water defaulted in April amid a standoff with shareholders over providing more equity.

Some investors blame Ofwat for allowing the crisis at Thames to develop.

"It completely degrades the whole system of regulation," said one major investor who asked to remain anonymous having recently sold out of Thames. "It has left a very sour taste".


($1 = 0.7814 pounds)


thames water company circling the drain https://reut.rs/4eSq2je

Thames Water's assets are older than those of UK peers https://reut.rs/3TJb0mg


Reporting by Sarah Young and Marc Jones; Editing by David Holmes

</body></html>

면책조항: XM Group 회사는 체결 전용 서비스와 온라인 거래 플랫폼에 대한 접근을 제공하여, 개인이 웹사이트에서 또는 웹사이트를 통해 이용 가능한 콘텐츠를 보거나 사용할 수 있도록 허용합니다. 이에 대해 변경하거나 확장할 의도는 없습니다. 이러한 접근 및 사용에는 다음 사항이 항상 적용됩니다: (i) 이용 약관, (ii) 위험 경고, (iii) 완전 면책조항. 따라서, 이러한 콘텐츠는 일반적인 정보에 불과합니다. 특히, 온라인 거래 플랫폼의 콘텐츠는 금융 시장에서의 거래에 대한 권유나 제안이 아닙니다. 금융 시장에서의 거래는 자본에 상당한 위험을 수반합니다.

온라인 거래 플랫폼에 공개된 모든 자료는 교육/정보 목적으로만 제공되며, 금융, 투자세 또는 거래 조언 및 권고, 거래 가격 기록, 금융 상품 또는 원치 않는 금융 프로모션의 거래 제안 또는 권유를 포함하지 않으며, 포함해서도 안됩니다.

이 웹사이트에 포함된 모든 의견, 뉴스, 리서치, 분석, 가격, 기타 정보 또는 제3자 사이트에 대한 링크와 같이 XM이 준비하는 콘텐츠 뿐만 아니라, 제3자 콘텐츠는 일반 시장 논평으로서 "현재" 기준으로 제공되며, 투자 조언으로 여겨지지 않습니다. 모든 콘텐츠가 투자 리서치로 해석되는 경우, 투자 리서치의 독립성을 촉진하기 위해 고안된 법적 요건에 따라 콘텐츠가 의도되지 않았으며, 준비되지 않았다는 점을 인지하고 동의해야 합니다. 따라서, 관련 법률 및 규정에 따른 마케팅 커뮤니케이션이라고 간주됩니다. 여기에서 접근할 수 있는 앞서 언급한 정보에 대한 비독립 투자 리서치 및 위험 경고 알림을 읽고, 이해하시기 바랍니다.

리스크 경고: 고객님의 자본이 위험에 노출 될 수 있습니다. 레버리지 상품은 모든 분들에게 적합하지 않을수 있습니다. 당사의 리스크 공시를 참고하시기 바랍니다.