Tariffs offer poor airbag for Europe’s carmageddon
The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.
By Neil Unmack
LONDON, July 15 (Reuters Breakingviews) -The cavalry has arrived, but try telling that to European carmakers. Volkswagen VOWG_p.DE, Renault RENA.PA and others still have miserable valuations despite Brussels threatening China with electric-vehicle penalties. The duties may not be big enough, and could even hurt Western players.
At first glance, Brussels’ provisional tariffs look like a lifeline for the European automotive industry. Electric vehicles (EVs) made in the Middle Kingdom accounted for 25% of sales in the continent during the year to September 2023, the European Commission reckons, compared with just 3.9% in 2020. That figure includes Chinese groups BYD 002594.SZ and SAIC Motor but also Western brands with manufacturing operations in the country, like Tesla TSLA.O and BMW BMWG.DE. China’s sheer scale and quick EV adoption help its marques, but their success also reflects government subsidies and cheap financing.
The announcement of tariffs has done nothing to brighten European carmakers’ prospects, at least in investors’ eyes. On average, Renault, Porsche, Stellantis STLAM.MI, Volkswagen, BMW and Mercedes-Benz MBGn.DE are now worth just under 6 times forward earnings, per LSEG data, with Volkswagen worth less than 3 times. Those valuation multiples have barely budged since Europe first floated tariffs in September 2023. The sector’s total value has declined by around 6% since then, compared with a 13% increase in the STOXX Europe 600 Index.
One problem is that the tariffs may be too low, and poorly targeted. The provisional levies range from 17.4% to 37.6% on imports, depending on the level of perceived subsidy and how co-operative the European Commission deems individual carmakers to have been. Because the prevailing prices in Europe are substantially higher than in China, low-cost importers have a cushion to absorb tariffs. BYD, China’s and the world’s biggest EV maker, is only facing the low end of the tariff range. Analysts at Rhodium reckon it could sell key brands like the mass-market Dolphin range at a premium to Chinese prices, even after factoring in shipping costs and a 30% tariff.
The duties may also incentivise Chinese players to set up shop in Europe, or nearby. That might be welcome news for Hungary, Turkey and other low-cost economies, but not for European carmakers. Their Chinese competitors would be encroaching on their manufacturing turf, but with greater scale and access to cheap batteries. UBS analysts reckon BYD could still enjoy a 25% cost advantage over Western players by setting up in low-cost European economies.
The bigger problem, however, is that the tariffs may hurt the European groups as much as they help. Many carmakers manufacture vehicles in China and then bring them home, such as Renault’s Dacia brand and BMW’s iX3 – in fact, campaign group Transport & Environment reckons over half of China-made EVs sold in Europe emanate from Western carmakers. That means they will have to pay the bloc’s tariffs, but without the low-cost cushion enjoyed by BYD. The European importers could either pass on the costs to customers, which would hurt their market share, or cut imports from China, making it harder to meet European EV targets. Moreover, China is likely to retaliate. Reverse tariffs on European imports could hurt firms, like Porsche and BMW, that send high-end vehicles to China.
Brussels, and other governments, could go further. One option is to impose yet more tariffs to penalise Chinese players, such as targeting batteries imported from China. Yet that might stymie the EU’s drive to decarbonise transport, given the continent’s dependence on Chinese technology. Another is to introduce bigger and more explicit subsidies for European carmakers and battery supply chains. Yet that just risks a more aggressive Chinese response.
More radically still, Europe could row back on its green targets, such as its ambition to phase out combustion engine cars by 2035. Counterintuitively, that could help Western players weather competition in EVs by preserving their profitability. But it would leave a big dent in the continent’s plan to cut overall emissions by 55% from 1990 levels by 2030. Moreover, carmakers could delay investing in greening their fleets, and end up even further behind China. Europe may be reaching the limits of what it can do.
Follow @Unmack1 on X
CONTEXT NEWS
The European Commission on July 4 announced provisional tariffs for electric vehicles imported to Europe from China.
As part of its anti-subsidy investigation, the European Commission will impose countervailing duties ranging between 17.4% and 37.6% of the price of an electric vehicle imported from China. BYD, the Middle Kingdom’s largest EV exporter, will face the lowest tariff of 17.4%.
Graphic: European carmarkers forward price earnings ratio https://reut.rs/463Py0X
Graphic: Carmakers stock performance https://reut.rs/4cV0f8h
Editing by George Hay and Oliver Taslic
면책조항: XM Group 회사는 체결 전용 서비스와 온라인 거래 플랫폼에 대한 접근을 제공하여, 개인이 웹사이트에서 또는 웹사이트를 통해 이용 가능한 콘텐츠를 보거나 사용할 수 있도록 허용합니다. 이에 대해 변경하거나 확장할 의도는 없습니다. 이러한 접근 및 사용에는 다음 사항이 항상 적용됩니다: (i) 이용 약관, (ii) 위험 경고, (iii) 완전 면책조항. 따라서, 이러한 콘텐츠는 일반적인 정보에 불과합니다. 특히, 온라인 거래 플랫폼의 콘텐츠는 금융 시장에서의 거래에 대한 권유나 제안이 아닙니다. 금융 시장에서의 거래는 자본에 상당한 위험을 수반합니다.
온라인 거래 플랫폼에 공개된 모든 자료는 교육/정보 목적으로만 제공되며, 금융, 투자세 또는 거래 조언 및 권고, 거래 가격 기록, 금융 상품 또는 원치 않는 금융 프로모션의 거래 제안 또는 권유를 포함하지 않으며, 포함해서도 안됩니다.
이 웹사이트에 포함된 모든 의견, 뉴스, 리서치, 분석, 가격, 기타 정보 또는 제3자 사이트에 대한 링크와 같이 XM이 준비하는 콘텐츠 뿐만 아니라, 제3자 콘텐츠는 일반 시장 논평으로서 "현재" 기준으로 제공되며, 투자 조언으로 여겨지지 않습니다. 모든 콘텐츠가 투자 리서치로 해석되는 경우, 투자 리서치의 독립성을 촉진하기 위해 고안된 법적 요건에 따라 콘텐츠가 의도되지 않았으며, 준비되지 않았다는 점을 인지하고 동의해야 합니다. 따라서, 관련 법률 및 규정에 따른 마케팅 커뮤니케이션이라고 간주됩니다. 여기에서 접근할 수 있는 앞서 언급한 정보에 대한 비독립 투자 리서치 및 위험 경고 알림을 읽고, 이해하시기 바랍니다.
