Stripe would be an ugly pattern for Silicon Valley
The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.
By Robert Cyran
NEW YORK, July 16 (Reuters Breakingviews) -Stripe develops software to facilitate payments, but its financial backers are struggling to receive theirs. Started by John and Patrick Collison in 2009, the financial technology company has given no sign of going public soon, making it hard for venture capitalists to cash out. Enter Sequoia Capital with a plan that will buy some time, but one which if applied too often would distort the investment model.
Most successful 15-year-old startups already have been bought by a bigger rival or proceeded with an initial public offering. Stripe hasn’t. To appease limited partners itchy to exit funds from 2009 to 2012, Sequoia is offering to buy up to about $860 million of shares using newer funds.
There’s no obvious reason for an IPO. Although it raised $6.5 billion last year, Stripe says the business generates more cash than it spends. Outside investors enable employees to sell their stakes through tender offers, such as the nearly $700 million one in April. The company avoids regulatory and disclosure hassles while fetching a higher valuation than it probably could in public markets.
Total payment volume at Stripe increased 25% last year, exceeding $1 trillion. European rival Adyen ADYEN.AS processed a similar amount and is expanding just as quickly, but its market capitalization is less than $40 billion. Stripe, at $70 billion, may have more growth ahead of it and new services like automated billing also look promising. In today’s choppy IPO markets, however, it might be hard to persuade investors to pay for the prospects.
Sequoia’s plan indicates confidence. It has invested more than $500 million in Stripe, according to a letter to investors published by Axios this week. For now, though, it has no way to turn a $9 billion return on paper into reality.
New Sequoia funds, including an open-ended one, will buy out investors in older ones. If successful, it will plaster over an idiosyncratic problem. There’s liquidity for those who want it, a fresh opportunity to get behind the Collisons, and Stripe avoids the public spotlight for longer.
The problem would be too many Silicon Valley founders getting similar ideas. If companies like Elon Musk’s SpaceX decide they want to stay private, it would significantly alter the venture capital business. The idea has always been to get in early on up-and-comers and get paid out a few years later. Paying steep fees to own chunks of large, mature companies for an indeterminate period of time is something different altogether.
Follow @rob_cyran on X
CONTEXT NEWS
Venture capital firm Sequoia Capital is using newer funds in an offer to buy as much as $861 million of Stripe shares held by limited partners in its funds established between 2009 and 2012 for $27 apiece, imputing a $70 billion valuation, Axios reported on July 15.
Sequoia said in a letter to investors it had invested a total of $517 million in Stripe, now worth $9.8 billion at the latest valuation.
Number of US tech IPOs has slowed https://reut.rs/4f3iCdc
Editing by Jeffrey Goldfarb and Pranav Kiran
면책조항: XM Group 회사는 체결 전용 서비스와 온라인 거래 플랫폼에 대한 접근을 제공하여, 개인이 웹사이트에서 또는 웹사이트를 통해 이용 가능한 콘텐츠를 보거나 사용할 수 있도록 허용합니다. 이에 대해 변경하거나 확장할 의도는 없습니다. 이러한 접근 및 사용에는 다음 사항이 항상 적용됩니다: (i) 이용 약관, (ii) 위험 경고, (iii) 완전 면책조항. 따라서, 이러한 콘텐츠는 일반적인 정보에 불과합니다. 특히, 온라인 거래 플랫폼의 콘텐츠는 금융 시장에서의 거래에 대한 권유나 제안이 아닙니다. 금융 시장에서의 거래는 자본에 상당한 위험을 수반합니다.
온라인 거래 플랫폼에 공개된 모든 자료는 교육/정보 목적으로만 제공되며, 금융, 투자세 또는 거래 조언 및 권고, 거래 가격 기록, 금융 상품 또는 원치 않는 금융 프로모션의 거래 제안 또는 권유를 포함하지 않으며, 포함해서도 안됩니다.
이 웹사이트에 포함된 모든 의견, 뉴스, 리서치, 분석, 가격, 기타 정보 또는 제3자 사이트에 대한 링크와 같이 XM이 준비하는 콘텐츠 뿐만 아니라, 제3자 콘텐츠는 일반 시장 논평으로서 "현재" 기준으로 제공되며, 투자 조언으로 여겨지지 않습니다. 모든 콘텐츠가 투자 리서치로 해석되는 경우, 투자 리서치의 독립성을 촉진하기 위해 고안된 법적 요건에 따라 콘텐츠가 의도되지 않았으며, 준비되지 않았다는 점을 인지하고 동의해야 합니다. 따라서, 관련 법률 및 규정에 따른 마케팅 커뮤니케이션이라고 간주됩니다. 여기에서 접근할 수 있는 앞서 언급한 정보에 대한 비독립 투자 리서치 및 위험 경고 알림을 읽고, 이해하시기 바랍니다.
