XM은(는) 미국 국적의 시민에게 서비스를 제공하지 않습니다.

Pension funds rethink hedging tactics after UK crisis



<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head><title>Pension funds rethink hedging tactics after UK crisis</title></head><body>

'LDI' tools gain popularity two years after pensions blow-up

Providers say they are better able to absorb shocks

Value of leveraged hedging halves in two years - regulator

By Carolyn Cohn and Iain Withers

LONDON, Oct 4 (Reuters) -Two years after market chaos jeopardised Britain's 2 trillion pound ($2.7 trillion) pensions industry, the hedging strategy that exacerbated the crisis is increasing in popularity - although providers say with less of the risk.

In September 2022, Britain's then-prime minister Liz Truss' 'mini-budget' promising unfunded tax cuts spooked investors, triggering a massive sell-off in UK government bonds or 'gilts'.

That had a disastrous knock-on effect for many pension funds, who were not only heavily exposed to these assets but who had also used leveraged financial instruments to hedge against sharp rate moves and inflation, under a strategy known as 'Liability Driven Investment' (LDI).

The dramatic swings in gilt prices triggered collateral calls on pension funds' LDI positions, sparking a dash by operators to fire-sell the funds' most liquid assets to raise the necessary cash.

For most funds, this meant selling off UK government debt into a rapidly tumbling market. The Bank of England was forced to step in and buy gilts to stabilise prices.

Regulators have since then been pressing for more collateral and reduced leverage to avoid a repeat of the crisis whilst recognising the role that hedging plays in protecting assets.

"LDI is as important as ever to pension schemes, if not more important as many schemes are looking to manage potential surpluses and reach their desired end game," said Adam Baker, a manager in BlackRock's BLK.N LDI business.

LDI providers said they had taken various steps to make the strategy safer, including reducing leverage and setting aside more liquid assets such as corporate bonds as collateral that can be more easily cashed in.

However, executives acknowledged the new approach remains untested and no system is immune to every shock.


'LDI 2.0'

Four of the biggest LDI providers - Legal & General LGEN.L, Insight Investment, Schroders SDR.L and Columbia Threadneedle - told Reuters that pension funds have increased their use of hedging tools including LDI.

LGIM said its defined benefit pension scheme clients had increased their hedging ratios to 86-87% of their liabilities, up as much as seven percentage points in two years, with LDI the primary method of choice.

Partly in response to tougher regulation, LGIM's pooled funds have increased the collateral available to withstand rate moves of 3 percentage points or more, up from 1.5 to 2 points pre-crisis, giving them a bigger buffer in any crisis.

"Many people call it LDI 2.0", said Legal & General Investment Management's (LGIM) Anne-Marie Morris.

Insight Investment said its clients were increasing their use of hedging, while Schroders said LDI was being deployed more by both existing and new clients, without providing data.

XPS, a pensions consultancy, said the proportion of LDI assets held across its clients had increased by 8 percentage points in two years.

At the same time, pension funds have been able to deleverage their hedging positions, partly because higher interest rates have improved their funding positions by reducing their liabilities.

Data from The Pensions Regulator (TPR) shared with Reuters showed that the value of leveraged LDI positions currently stands at 600-700 billion pounds, around half the level in late 2021, representing a reduced, but still sizeable exposure.

The regulator said it holds data on traditional assets, but not unleveraged LDI positions specifically, which could include standard gilt funds and corporate bonds, without the need to post collateral.

"Defined benefit pension schemes are better funded than at any time in recent memory," said Neil Bull, TPR's executive director of market oversight, adding TPR would continue to monitor potential LDI risks.

($1 = 0.7530 pounds)



Reporting by Carolyn Cohn and Iain Withers
Editing by Tommy Reggiori Wilkes, Sinead Cruise and Elaine Hardcastle

</body></html>

면책조항: XM Group 회사는 체결 전용 서비스와 온라인 거래 플랫폼에 대한 접근을 제공하여, 개인이 웹사이트에서 또는 웹사이트를 통해 이용 가능한 콘텐츠를 보거나 사용할 수 있도록 허용합니다. 이에 대해 변경하거나 확장할 의도는 없습니다. 이러한 접근 및 사용에는 다음 사항이 항상 적용됩니다: (i) 이용 약관, (ii) 위험 경고, (iii) 완전 면책조항. 따라서, 이러한 콘텐츠는 일반적인 정보에 불과합니다. 특히, 온라인 거래 플랫폼의 콘텐츠는 금융 시장에서의 거래에 대한 권유나 제안이 아닙니다. 금융 시장에서의 거래는 자본에 상당한 위험을 수반합니다.

온라인 거래 플랫폼에 공개된 모든 자료는 교육/정보 목적으로만 제공되며, 금융, 투자세 또는 거래 조언 및 권고, 거래 가격 기록, 금융 상품 또는 원치 않는 금융 프로모션의 거래 제안 또는 권유를 포함하지 않으며, 포함해서도 안됩니다.

이 웹사이트에 포함된 모든 의견, 뉴스, 리서치, 분석, 가격, 기타 정보 또는 제3자 사이트에 대한 링크와 같이 XM이 준비하는 콘텐츠 뿐만 아니라, 제3자 콘텐츠는 일반 시장 논평으로서 "현재" 기준으로 제공되며, 투자 조언으로 여겨지지 않습니다. 모든 콘텐츠가 투자 리서치로 해석되는 경우, 투자 리서치의 독립성을 촉진하기 위해 고안된 법적 요건에 따라 콘텐츠가 의도되지 않았으며, 준비되지 않았다는 점을 인지하고 동의해야 합니다. 따라서, 관련 법률 및 규정에 따른 마케팅 커뮤니케이션이라고 간주됩니다. 여기에서 접근할 수 있는 앞서 언급한 정보에 대한 비독립 투자 리서치 및 위험 경고 알림을 읽고, 이해하시기 바랍니다.

리스크 경고: 고객님의 자본이 위험에 노출 될 수 있습니다. 레버리지 상품은 모든 분들에게 적합하지 않을수 있습니다. 당사의 리스크 공시를 참고하시기 바랍니다.