Massachusetts voters allow Uber, Lyft drivers to unionize
First U.S. state to give drivers path to unionizing
Could provide blueprint for drivers in other states
Uber, Lyft have expressed concerns about details
Adds SEIU comment in paragraphs 4-5; adds Uber and Lyft statements in paragraphs 13-15
By Nate Raymond
BOSTON, Nov 6 (Reuters) -Massachusetts voters on Tuesday approved a ballot measure that would allow ride-share drivers to unionize, becoming the first U.S. state to allow drivers for app-based companies like Uber UBER.N and Lyft LYFT.O to do so.
With 94% of precincts reporting, 53.9% of voters endorsed a novel framework that would allow ride-share drivers who are considered by the companies to be independent contractors to organize and bargain collectively over pay and benefits, according to the Associated Press, which called the vote mid-Wednesday.
Supporters have said the ballot measure known as Question 3 could provide a model for other states to let Uber and Lyft drivers unionize and inspire efforts to organize them around the United States.
Roxana Rivera, assistant to the president of 32BJ SEIU, an affiliate of the Service Employees International Union, that had spearheaded a campaign to pass the proposal, said its approval shows that Massachusetts voters want drivers to have a meaningful check against the growing power of app-based companies.
“Working people in Massachusetts have won a monumental victory with Question 3," Rivera said in a statement.
The Massachusetts vote was the latest front in a years-long battle in the United States over whether ride-share drivers should be considered to be independent contractors or employees entitled to benefits and wage protections. Studies have shown that using contractors can cost companies as much as 30% less than employees.
Drivers for Uber and Lyft, including approximately 70,000 in Massachusetts, do not have the right to organize under the National Labor Relations Act, a federal law that covers only actual employees.
Under the Massachusetts measure, drivers can form a union after collecting signatures from at least 25% of active drivers in Massachusetts, andcompanies can formassociations to allow them to jointly negotiate with the union during state-supervised talks.
The measure was backed by the SEIU and the International Association of Machinists and was endorsed by several top political leaders, including Andrea Campbell, the state's Democratic attorney general.
Campbell in June secured a settlement with Uber and Lyft requiring them to adopta $32.50 hourly minimum pay standard for Massachusetts drivers and pay $175 million to resolve claims they had improperly treated drivers as independent contractors, rather than employees.
The companies as part of the settlement abandoned their support of a since-dropped ballot measure that would have codified into law the drivers' status as contractors. But the settlement stopped short of declaring the drivers employees.
Uber and Lyft opted not to campaign against Question 3, though both said they had concerns with certain language in the measure that they hoped could be addressed by the state legislature.
In a statement on Wednesday, Uber noted that the proposal "just squeaked by" even though Massachusetts is a "deeply blue, pro-union state."
"It’s clear that voters have reservations and it’s now incumbent upon the legislature to address their concerns," the company said.
Lyft in a statement said: "With the passage of this ballot measure, we look forward to working collaboratively on its implementations and addressing some of the language concerns we have during the legislative session next year."
Question 3 had been put forward before the industry dropped its separate ballot proposal, and its supporters argued that it provided the best path forward for drivers to secure better working conditions post-settlement.
Question 3 divided the local labor movement, with some activists saying it did not go far enough. Some opponents also had argued it may conflict with federal law and be open to a legal challenge.
Reporting by Nate Raymond in Boston and Daniel Wiessner in Albany, New York, Editing by Will Dunham, Alexia Garamfalvi and Diane Craft
면책조항: XM Group 회사는 체결 전용 서비스와 온라인 거래 플랫폼에 대한 접근을 제공하여, 개인이 웹사이트에서 또는 웹사이트를 통해 이용 가능한 콘텐츠를 보거나 사용할 수 있도록 허용합니다. 이에 대해 변경하거나 확장할 의도는 없습니다. 이러한 접근 및 사용에는 다음 사항이 항상 적용됩니다: (i) 이용 약관, (ii) 위험 경고, (iii) 완전 면책조항. 따라서, 이러한 콘텐츠는 일반적인 정보에 불과합니다. 특히, 온라인 거래 플랫폼의 콘텐츠는 금융 시장에서의 거래에 대한 권유나 제안이 아닙니다. 금융 시장에서의 거래는 자본에 상당한 위험을 수반합니다.
온라인 거래 플랫폼에 공개된 모든 자료는 교육/정보 목적으로만 제공되며, 금융, 투자세 또는 거래 조언 및 권고, 거래 가격 기록, 금융 상품 또는 원치 않는 금융 프로모션의 거래 제안 또는 권유를 포함하지 않으며, 포함해서도 안됩니다.
이 웹사이트에 포함된 모든 의견, 뉴스, 리서치, 분석, 가격, 기타 정보 또는 제3자 사이트에 대한 링크와 같이 XM이 준비하는 콘텐츠 뿐만 아니라, 제3자 콘텐츠는 일반 시장 논평으로서 "현재" 기준으로 제공되며, 투자 조언으로 여겨지지 않습니다. 모든 콘텐츠가 투자 리서치로 해석되는 경우, 투자 리서치의 독립성을 촉진하기 위해 고안된 법적 요건에 따라 콘텐츠가 의도되지 않았으며, 준비되지 않았다는 점을 인지하고 동의해야 합니다. 따라서, 관련 법률 및 규정에 따른 마케팅 커뮤니케이션이라고 간주됩니다. 여기에서 접근할 수 있는 앞서 언급한 정보에 대한 비독립 투자 리서치 및 위험 경고 알림을 읽고, 이해하시기 바랍니다.
