Live Nation must face consumer lawsuit over ticket prices, US appeals court rules
Adds comment from New Era in paragraph 5
By Mike Scarcella
Oct 28 (Reuters) -Live Nation Entertainment and its subsidiary Ticketmaster have failed to persuade a U.S. appeals court to block a proposed class action accusing them of charging artificially high ticket prices.
The San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Monday upheld a lower judge’s 2023 ruling that said Live Nation could not enforce contract provisions that required ticket buyers to arbitrate their claims rather than sue in federal court.
The appeals panel said the arbitration rules were unfair to consumers and “overtly” beneficial to defendants. The rules, which placed the ticketholders' claims in the hands of a new arbitration body called New Era ADR, were “unconscionable and unenforceable,” the court said.
Beverly Hills-based Live Nation did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
New Era chief executive Rich Lee in a statement said the company, which is not a defendant, was disappointed by the court's decision. Lee said New Era's rules are "objective, easy to understand, and, most importantly, highly advantageous for any party with meritorious claims or defenses."
The closely watched appeal tested the scope of companies' power to compel buyers to arbitrate their disputes, including through "mass" arbitrations involving hundreds or thousands of claims.
Warren Postman, a lawyer for the consumers, welcomed the decision in a statement. He criticized what he called "corporate attempts to impose novel group procedures to gain tactical advantages over consumers and employees."
The appeals panel found a key 2005 California Supreme Court opinion protecting class actions applied to the antitrust case against Live Nation and was not preempted by the Federal Arbitration Act.
New Era’s arbitration rules were an “inadequate vehicle” for the plaintiffs to resolve their claims,the three-judge panel said, with rules “so dense, convoluted and internally contradictory to be borderline unintelligible.”
Live Nation has defended New Era, calling its rules "sensible, fair, and similar" to those at other platforms.
In May, the U.S. Justice Department and a group of states asked a U.S. judge in Manhattan to break up Live Nation for allegedly violating antitrust law, claiming the company “suffocates its competition” in its control over ticket sales and pricing.
Live Nation in a statement then said there was more competition than ever before in the live events market.
The case is Skot Heckman et al v. Live Nation et al, 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 23-55770.
For plaintiffs: Warren Postman and Albert Pak of Keller Postman; and Kevin Teruya and Adam Wolfson of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan
For defendants: Roman Martinez and Tim O’Mara of Latham & Watkins
Read more:
In Live Nation case, appeals court mulls mass arbitration breakthrough
Live Nation 'suffocates its competition,' US says in monopoly lawsuit
Live Nation in consumer ticket-price lawsuit loses bid for 'mass' arbitration
Reporting by Mike Scarcella
면책조항: XM Group 회사는 체결 전용 서비스와 온라인 거래 플랫폼에 대한 접근을 제공하여, 개인이 웹사이트에서 또는 웹사이트를 통해 이용 가능한 콘텐츠를 보거나 사용할 수 있도록 허용합니다. 이에 대해 변경하거나 확장할 의도는 없습니다. 이러한 접근 및 사용에는 다음 사항이 항상 적용됩니다: (i) 이용 약관, (ii) 위험 경고, (iii) 완전 면책조항. 따라서, 이러한 콘텐츠는 일반적인 정보에 불과합니다. 특히, 온라인 거래 플랫폼의 콘텐츠는 금융 시장에서의 거래에 대한 권유나 제안이 아닙니다. 금융 시장에서의 거래는 자본에 상당한 위험을 수반합니다.
온라인 거래 플랫폼에 공개된 모든 자료는 교육/정보 목적으로만 제공되며, 금융, 투자세 또는 거래 조언 및 권고, 거래 가격 기록, 금융 상품 또는 원치 않는 금융 프로모션의 거래 제안 또는 권유를 포함하지 않으며, 포함해서도 안됩니다.
이 웹사이트에 포함된 모든 의견, 뉴스, 리서치, 분석, 가격, 기타 정보 또는 제3자 사이트에 대한 링크와 같이 XM이 준비하는 콘텐츠 뿐만 아니라, 제3자 콘텐츠는 일반 시장 논평으로서 "현재" 기준으로 제공되며, 투자 조언으로 여겨지지 않습니다. 모든 콘텐츠가 투자 리서치로 해석되는 경우, 투자 리서치의 독립성을 촉진하기 위해 고안된 법적 요건에 따라 콘텐츠가 의도되지 않았으며, 준비되지 않았다는 점을 인지하고 동의해야 합니다. 따라서, 관련 법률 및 규정에 따른 마케팅 커뮤니케이션이라고 간주됩니다. 여기에서 접근할 수 있는 앞서 언급한 정보에 대한 비독립 투자 리서치 및 위험 경고 알림을 읽고, 이해하시기 바랍니다.
