XM은(는) 미국 국적의 시민에게 서비스를 제공하지 않습니다.

How India's Byju's went from startup star to facing insolvency



<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head><title>EXPLAINER-How India's Byju's went from startup star to facing insolvency</title></head><body>

Updates with latest developments

By Ashwin Manikandan and VarunVyas Hebbalalu

BENGALURU/MUMBAI, Aug. 14 (Reuters) -India's top court revived insolvency proceedings against edtech company Byju's on Wednesday following a lawsuit from U.S. lenders.

The latest court order deepens a crisis that has seen the one-time market darling's valuation plunge from about $22 billion to less than $2 billion.

Here is an overview of Byju's and its troubles:


WHAT TRIGGERED THE INSOLVENCY?

The Indian cricket board last year asked a tribunal to initiate insolvency proceedings against Byju's for defaulting on $19 million of dues. The dispute is over payments related to sponsorship rights for the Indian cricket team's jerseys.

The two sides had settled the matter, with Byju's agreeing to pay the full amount. Following that, an appeals tribunal quashed the insolvency proceedings against the company.


WHAT ARE THE U.S. LENDERS SAYING?

The settlement and the quashing of insolvency proceedings prompted U.S. lenders represented by Glas Trust to approach India's Supreme Court.

These lenders say they are owed $1 billion by the company.

Glas argues that Byju's is using the money owed to lenders to pay the cricket board.

India's Supreme Court stayed the tribunal's order and will re-start insolvency proceedings against Byju's.


WHAT'S THE TUSSLE WITH INVESTORS?

In February, a group of shareholders, including tech investor Prosus, alleged "financial mismanagement and compliance issues" at Byju's and called for the removal of founder and CEO Byju Raveendran, and a reconstitution of the board.

"We are deeply concerned about the future stability of the company under its current leadership and with the current constitution of the Board," the shareholders said.

Byju's, which has denied mismanagement, says the investors don't have the power to vote out its CEO.

In June, Prosus wrote off the value of its 9.6% stake in Byju's, making the Dutch firm the first to fully write-off its investment in the troubled startup.


WHY DID DELOITTE, BOARD MEMBERS RESIGN?

Last year, Deloitte said it was resigning as auditor because Byju's had delayed financial statements for the year ending March 31, 2022. Deloitte said it did not receive necessary documents even after writing several letters to the board.

Three board members of Byju's - representing investors Peak XV Partners (previously Sequoia Capital India), Prosus and Chan Zuckerberg Initiative - also stepped down.


WHAT DOES BYJU'S DO?

Byju's says it is the "world's largest education technology company". It offers online tutorials on subjects such as maths, physics and chemistry for school students.

The online business boomed during the COVID-19 pandemic. Byju's valuation shot up from $5 billion before the pandemic to $22 billion in 2022, and it acquired several companies on the way.

WHO ARE BYJU'S FOUNDERS?

Byju's is run by its founder, Byju Raveendran, and his wife, Divya Gokulnath. Raveendran, an engineer by training whose parents were teachers, started teaching mathematics to friends, and built the business as its popularity grew.

He launched Byju's in 2011 and its app in 2015.



Reporting by Ashwin Manikandan and Varun Hebbalalu in Bengaluru; Editing by Aditya Kalra and Mark Potter, Kirsten Donovan

</body></html>

면책조항: XM Group 회사는 체결 전용 서비스와 온라인 거래 플랫폼에 대한 접근을 제공하여, 개인이 웹사이트에서 또는 웹사이트를 통해 이용 가능한 콘텐츠를 보거나 사용할 수 있도록 허용합니다. 이에 대해 변경하거나 확장할 의도는 없습니다. 이러한 접근 및 사용에는 다음 사항이 항상 적용됩니다: (i) 이용 약관, (ii) 위험 경고, (iii) 완전 면책조항. 따라서, 이러한 콘텐츠는 일반적인 정보에 불과합니다. 특히, 온라인 거래 플랫폼의 콘텐츠는 금융 시장에서의 거래에 대한 권유나 제안이 아닙니다. 금융 시장에서의 거래는 자본에 상당한 위험을 수반합니다.

온라인 거래 플랫폼에 공개된 모든 자료는 교육/정보 목적으로만 제공되며, 금융, 투자세 또는 거래 조언 및 권고, 거래 가격 기록, 금융 상품 또는 원치 않는 금융 프로모션의 거래 제안 또는 권유를 포함하지 않으며, 포함해서도 안됩니다.

이 웹사이트에 포함된 모든 의견, 뉴스, 리서치, 분석, 가격, 기타 정보 또는 제3자 사이트에 대한 링크와 같이 XM이 준비하는 콘텐츠 뿐만 아니라, 제3자 콘텐츠는 일반 시장 논평으로서 "현재" 기준으로 제공되며, 투자 조언으로 여겨지지 않습니다. 모든 콘텐츠가 투자 리서치로 해석되는 경우, 투자 리서치의 독립성을 촉진하기 위해 고안된 법적 요건에 따라 콘텐츠가 의도되지 않았으며, 준비되지 않았다는 점을 인지하고 동의해야 합니다. 따라서, 관련 법률 및 규정에 따른 마케팅 커뮤니케이션이라고 간주됩니다. 여기에서 접근할 수 있는 앞서 언급한 정보에 대한 비독립 투자 리서치 및 위험 경고 알림을 읽고, 이해하시기 바랍니다.

리스크 경고: 고객님의 자본이 위험에 노출 될 수 있습니다. 레버리지 상품은 모든 분들에게 적합하지 않을수 있습니다. 당사의 리스크 공시를 참고하시기 바랍니다.