Health Rounds: Deaths linked to hurricanes still occur years after storm hits
Health Rounds is published on Tuesdays and Thursdays. Think your friend or colleague should know about us? Forward this newsletter to them. They can also subscribe here.
By Nancy Lapid
Oct 3 (Reuters) -Hello Health Rounds Readers! In the aftermath of immensely destructive Hurricane Helene, which left more than 160 people dead, we have a troubling study that found deaths related to such storms can occur for many years afterward. We also cover a potentially important discovery about the nature of RSV, and a debunking of a sleep disorder treatment being touted on social media.
Hurricane death tolls extend for 15 years
Hurricanes and tropical storms in the United States cause a surge of deaths for nearly 15 years after the initial weather event strikes, new research suggests.
Governments only record the number of people killed during these tropical cyclones, usually due to drowning or injury. A new analysis, published in Nature, estimates that an average U.S. tropical cyclone indirectly causes 7,000 to 11,000 excess deaths during ensuing years.
Since 1930, these storms have contributed to between 3.6 million and 5.2 million U.S. deaths, whereas official government tallies put the total at about 10,000 deaths, according to the report.
“A big storm will hit, and there’s all these cascades of effects where cities are rebuilding or households are displaced or social networks are broken," with serious consequences for public health, study leader Solomon Hsiang of the Stanford Doerr School of Sustainability said in a statement.
“In any given month, people are dying earlier than they would have if the storm hadn’t hit their community,” Hsiang said.
The study’s estimates are based on data from the 501 tropical cyclones that hit the Atlantic and Gulf coasts from 1930 to 2015, and mortality rates for various populations within each state before and afterward.
While the study finds that more than 3 in 100 deaths nationwide are related to tropical cyclones, the burden is far higher for certain groups, with Black individuals three times more likely to die after a hurricane.
The many ways in which storms affect death rates over time aren't clear yet. Public spending may shift away from promoting long-run health to focus on immediate recovery needs, the researchers suggest.
Individuals might use retirement savings to repair property damage, reducing their ability to pay for future healthcare, they speculated. Family members might move away, weakening support networks that could be critical for good health down the line.
“These events can be so separated from the initial hazard that even affected individuals and their families may not see the connection,” the researchers said.
Clues to RSV structure may help prevent infections
Discoveries about the complex structure of the respiratory syncytial virus may eventually help prevent or slow infections from the virus, researchers said.
RSV causes critical illness for hundreds of thousands of children, older adults, and other high-risk groups in the United States each year, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
The precise structure of the virus has eluded researchers, making it difficult to identify targets for drugs.
Using an imaging technique called cryo-electron tomography, researchers have now discovered details of molecules and structures essential to RSV’s form and function.
Their report, published in Nature Communications, includes high-resolution images detailing the structure of two RSV proteins, RSV M and RSV F, that are crucial to interactions between the virus and the host cell membrane.
RSV F proteins sit on the viral surface, where they can engage with proteins on host cell surfaces and regulate the virus’ fusion and entry. The scientists believe F proteins may be a key to destabilizing the virus before it can infect its next host, making them a possible target for future drug development.
“Our primary findings reveal structural details that allow us to better understand not only how the protein regulates assembly of viral particles, but also the coordination of proteins that enable the virus to be infectious,” study leader Elizabeth Wright of the University of Wisconsin–Madison said in a statement.
Social media mouth-taping advice isn’t for everyone
Taping the mouth shut is no panacea for improving sleep or easing obstructive sleep apnea and in some cases can actually worsen a person’s airflow, contrary to social media posts touting the practice.
There is little objective data to back up these claims, and data from a study published in JAMA Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery found the practice to be marginally effective for some patients but also potentially dangerous.
“A deluge of coverage regarding the benefits of mouth taping on sleep quality has recently flooded social media,” with more than 7,000 posts garnering 7 million views available on TikTok with the hashtag #mouthtape, an accompanying editorial said.
In sleep studies performed in 54 middle-aged adults with sleep apnea, they found that forced mouth closure does sometimes improve airflow, but the effect varies depending on the extent to which people breathe through their mouth.
With moderate levels of mouth-breathing, airflow improves with mouth-taping. With no mouth-breathing, mouth-taping has no effect.
In those with high levels of mouth breathing, or who breathe through their mouth and have severe obstruction at the soft palate, airflow worsens with mouth closure.
It’s also possible that mouth closure would have adverse effects in patients who breathe through the mouth because of nasal obstruction, the authors said.
“These findings should temper the general belief that preventing mouth breathing during sleep will be universally beneficial,” they concluded.
Reporting by Nancy Lapid; editing by Bill Berkrot
면책조항: XM Group 회사는 체결 전용 서비스와 온라인 거래 플랫폼에 대한 접근을 제공하여, 개인이 웹사이트에서 또는 웹사이트를 통해 이용 가능한 콘텐츠를 보거나 사용할 수 있도록 허용합니다. 이에 대해 변경하거나 확장할 의도는 없습니다. 이러한 접근 및 사용에는 다음 사항이 항상 적용됩니다: (i) 이용 약관, (ii) 위험 경고, (iii) 완전 면책조항. 따라서, 이러한 콘텐츠는 일반적인 정보에 불과합니다. 특히, 온라인 거래 플랫폼의 콘텐츠는 금융 시장에서의 거래에 대한 권유나 제안이 아닙니다. 금융 시장에서의 거래는 자본에 상당한 위험을 수반합니다.
온라인 거래 플랫폼에 공개된 모든 자료는 교육/정보 목적으로만 제공되며, 금융, 투자세 또는 거래 조언 및 권고, 거래 가격 기록, 금융 상품 또는 원치 않는 금융 프로모션의 거래 제안 또는 권유를 포함하지 않으며, 포함해서도 안됩니다.
이 웹사이트에 포함된 모든 의견, 뉴스, 리서치, 분석, 가격, 기타 정보 또는 제3자 사이트에 대한 링크와 같이 XM이 준비하는 콘텐츠 뿐만 아니라, 제3자 콘텐츠는 일반 시장 논평으로서 "현재" 기준으로 제공되며, 투자 조언으로 여겨지지 않습니다. 모든 콘텐츠가 투자 리서치로 해석되는 경우, 투자 리서치의 독립성을 촉진하기 위해 고안된 법적 요건에 따라 콘텐츠가 의도되지 않았으며, 준비되지 않았다는 점을 인지하고 동의해야 합니다. 따라서, 관련 법률 및 규정에 따른 마케팅 커뮤니케이션이라고 간주됩니다. 여기에서 접근할 수 있는 앞서 언급한 정보에 대한 비독립 투자 리서치 및 위험 경고 알림을 읽고, 이해하시기 바랍니다.
