Fed Bowman's dissent is first from Fed governor since 2005
WASHINGTON, Sept 18 (Reuters) -Federal Reserve Governor Michelle Bowman on Wednesday became the first Fed governor to vote against an interest-rate decision by the U.S. central bank since 2005, denying Fed Chair Jerome Powell a clear consensus at a pivotal moment.
The Fed's other 11 voting members all cast their ballots in support of reducing the Fed's policy rate by half apercentage point. Bowman, the Fed said, preferred a quarter-point rate cut.
Of the Fed's 19 policymakers who take part in each two-day rate-setting meeting, only 12 cast a vote on the decision. Those include eight permanent voters, including all seven members of the Fed Board and the president of the New York Fed, with the remaining 11 Fed presidents trading off one-year turns at the ballot box in groups of four.
Before 1995 dissents from Fed governors were not infrequent, but since then it has been Fed presidents who have cast the overwhelming majority of the 90-plus dissents in that time period. Fed chairs typically seek consensus on decisions, sometimes reaching compromises to avert open disagreement that could be seen as undercutting their credibility.
"I do think that we’re a consensus-driven organization," Fed Chair Jerome Powell said after the July rate-setting meeting, at which the group reached its 17th straight unanimous rate-setting decision. During the pandemic dissents were infrequent. "We felt more united because we felt under a lot of pressure to get things right," Powell said then, "but before the pandemic, we had plenty of dissents. And dissents happen. It’s part of the process. There’s nothing wrong with dissents, and if it happens, it happens."
Watershed moments in Fed decision-making are, in fact, sometimes marked by dissents.
In June 2022, Kansas City Fed President Esther George cast what until Wednesday had been the most recent dissent. She had argued for a smaller rate hike, but her colleagues opted for a 75-basis-point increase to battle accelerating inflation. It was the first of a string a four such super-sized moves, the rest of which George ended up backing.
Dissents "clearly suggest that they are not suffering from 'group think,'" said ING economist James Knightley before the meeting. "There are lots of risks to balance and (dissent) would suggest tough discussions are being had."
Ahead of the Fed's decision, financial market bets were running in favor of a half-of-a-percentage-point rate cut; analysts at Wall Street firms for the most part expected a quarter-point cut.
Bowman has made a practice of publicly diverging from the majority at the Fed Board over regulatory matters, with frequent and repeated calls for a lighter touch on banks.
Over the past year she also emerged as one of the Fed's most hawkish voices on monetary policy, supporting a higher Fed policy rate for longer than most of her fellow central bankers in order to be sure to fully vanquish inflation. Bowman's dissent on Wednesday was the first by a Fed governor in the hawkish direction - that is, in favor of tighter monetary policy, rather than looser - in nearly 30 years.
Below is a sampling of some notable dissents in recent Fed history.
MOST RECENT | OCCURRED IN | CAST BY |
|---|---|---|
Dovish dissent | June 2022 | Kansas City Fed's Esther George |
Hawkish dissent | March 2022 | St Louis Fed's James Bullard |
Two dissents | Sept 2020 | Dallas Fed's Robert Kaplan, Minneapolis Fed's Neel Kashkari |
Three dissents | Sept 2019 | Bullard, George, Boston Fed's Eric Rosengren |
Fed Governor dissent | Sept 2005 | Marc Olson, who wanted easier policy |
Fed Governor hawkish dissent | Dec 1994 | John LaWare, who wanted tighter policy |
Four dissents | Oct 1992 | Two governors, two presidents |
Five dissents | May 1983 | Two governors, three presidents |
Reporting by Ann Saphir; Editing by Andrea Ricci
면책조항: XM Group 회사는 체결 전용 서비스와 온라인 거래 플랫폼에 대한 접근을 제공하여, 개인이 웹사이트에서 또는 웹사이트를 통해 이용 가능한 콘텐츠를 보거나 사용할 수 있도록 허용합니다. 이에 대해 변경하거나 확장할 의도는 없습니다. 이러한 접근 및 사용에는 다음 사항이 항상 적용됩니다: (i) 이용 약관, (ii) 위험 경고, (iii) 완전 면책조항. 따라서, 이러한 콘텐츠는 일반적인 정보에 불과합니다. 특히, 온라인 거래 플랫폼의 콘텐츠는 금융 시장에서의 거래에 대한 권유나 제안이 아닙니다. 금융 시장에서의 거래는 자본에 상당한 위험을 수반합니다.
온라인 거래 플랫폼에 공개된 모든 자료는 교육/정보 목적으로만 제공되며, 금융, 투자세 또는 거래 조언 및 권고, 거래 가격 기록, 금융 상품 또는 원치 않는 금융 프로모션의 거래 제안 또는 권유를 포함하지 않으며, 포함해서도 안됩니다.
이 웹사이트에 포함된 모든 의견, 뉴스, 리서치, 분석, 가격, 기타 정보 또는 제3자 사이트에 대한 링크와 같이 XM이 준비하는 콘텐츠 뿐만 아니라, 제3자 콘텐츠는 일반 시장 논평으로서 "현재" 기준으로 제공되며, 투자 조언으로 여겨지지 않습니다. 모든 콘텐츠가 투자 리서치로 해석되는 경우, 투자 리서치의 독립성을 촉진하기 위해 고안된 법적 요건에 따라 콘텐츠가 의도되지 않았으며, 준비되지 않았다는 점을 인지하고 동의해야 합니다. 따라서, 관련 법률 및 규정에 따른 마케팅 커뮤니케이션이라고 간주됩니다. 여기에서 접근할 수 있는 앞서 언급한 정보에 대한 비독립 투자 리서치 및 위험 경고 알림을 읽고, 이해하시기 바랍니다.
