XM은(는) 미국 국적의 시민에게 서비스를 제공하지 않습니다.

Ex-bankruptcy judge worried about prosecution, embarrassment



<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head><title>Ex-bankruptcy judge worried about prosecution, embarrassment</title></head><body>

By Dietrich Knauth

NEW YORK, Aug 22 (Reuters) -Former U.S. bankruptcy judge David Jones confirmed he was under criminal investigation at a recent court hearing in which he tried to ward off public questions about his once-secret romantic relationship with a Houston bankruptcy lawyer.

He also really, really wanted to explain that he has never gone water-skiing while dressed as a Christmas elf, according to a transcript of an Aug. 7 hearing in Houston bankruptcy court. The transcript, initially sealed so the court could redact sensitive information, was unsealed on Wednesday.

Jones was summoned to the hearing to explain why he volunteered for an "off the record" July 18 meeting with Jackson Walker, his romantic partner Liz Freeman's former law firm, related to a legal battle over fees that the law firm earned from cases filed in Jones' Houston court.

U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Eduardo Rodriguez ultimately sanctioned Jones for offering testimony outside of the court's supervision. Rodriguez is overseeing litigation initiated by the office of the U.S. Trustee, the U.S. Department of Justice's bankruptcy watchdog, which has argued that Jackson Walker knew about the relationship and chose to keep quiet so that it could continue collecting legal fees from the cases.

According to the transcript of the Aug. 7 hearing, Jones said he wanted to discuss his relationship with Freeman in private so that he could avoid public embarrassment and legal expenses over questions that had little to do with the fee dispute.

One of the things he wanted to explain was a blurry photo that had been presented as potential evidence that Jackson Walker was aware of his relationship with Freeman.

Jones said the photo actually showed Freeman's brother on the water-skis, and he wanted to save other lawyers from going down an expensive rabbit hole to investigate.

"I can't imagine how much money's been spent on the fact that, hey, Jones is water skiing the day after Christmas and this was sent to Jackson Walker," Jones told Rodriguez. "Look, I can't water ski. And it wasn't me."

Jones and his attorney did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Jones was once the busiest bankruptcy judge in the U.S. and had recently presided over the bankruptcies of JCPenney, Neiman Marcus, Party City and Chesapeake Energy, among many others. He resigned from the bench last October after admitting to sharing a home with Freeman.

Jones said at the August 7 hearing that he was concerned that the U.S. Trustee would ask him questions that would expose him to federal criminal charges without helping the investigation into Jackson Walker's legal fees.

"I'm under criminal investigation," Jones said. "And then the other arm of the Justice Department wants to depose me about a whole series of topics that have nothing to do with what Jackson Walker knew. ... That puts me in a horrible position."

Rodriguez expressed concern at the hearing that the legal battle could undermine judicial authority by opening up former judges and their clerks to questions about the inner workings of the courts. Rodriguez has yet to rule on what types of questions the U.S. Trustee and Jackson Walker can ask during proposed depositions of Jones and other former court employees.

Jones said he was open to discussing his divorce and marital infidelity with Jackson Walker, with the understanding that the information would not be used in any court proceeding and that no one would attribute it to him.

Jones said he worried that his answers in a formal deposition could be used to embarrass him or be taken out of context on social media.

"My relationship has been the subject of misinformation everywhere," Jones said. "It has caused, and I'm not asking for sympathy, it has caused an immense amount of embarrassment. It's affected my relationship. It's done a lot of very negative things. And most of it's simply wrong."

In addition to the criminal investigation, Jones has faced private lawsuits and a 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ethics inquiry over his failure to disclose his relationship. Other judges have chastised Jones in those cases, including one who recently wrote that Jones "ran roughshod" over legal and ethical requirements while overseeing cases where he was "obviously disqualified."



Reporting by Dietrich Knauth

</body></html>

면책조항: XM Group 회사는 체결 전용 서비스와 온라인 거래 플랫폼에 대한 접근을 제공하여, 개인이 웹사이트에서 또는 웹사이트를 통해 이용 가능한 콘텐츠를 보거나 사용할 수 있도록 허용합니다. 이에 대해 변경하거나 확장할 의도는 없습니다. 이러한 접근 및 사용에는 다음 사항이 항상 적용됩니다: (i) 이용 약관, (ii) 위험 경고, (iii) 완전 면책조항. 따라서, 이러한 콘텐츠는 일반적인 정보에 불과합니다. 특히, 온라인 거래 플랫폼의 콘텐츠는 금융 시장에서의 거래에 대한 권유나 제안이 아닙니다. 금융 시장에서의 거래는 자본에 상당한 위험을 수반합니다.

온라인 거래 플랫폼에 공개된 모든 자료는 교육/정보 목적으로만 제공되며, 금융, 투자세 또는 거래 조언 및 권고, 거래 가격 기록, 금융 상품 또는 원치 않는 금융 프로모션의 거래 제안 또는 권유를 포함하지 않으며, 포함해서도 안됩니다.

이 웹사이트에 포함된 모든 의견, 뉴스, 리서치, 분석, 가격, 기타 정보 또는 제3자 사이트에 대한 링크와 같이 XM이 준비하는 콘텐츠 뿐만 아니라, 제3자 콘텐츠는 일반 시장 논평으로서 "현재" 기준으로 제공되며, 투자 조언으로 여겨지지 않습니다. 모든 콘텐츠가 투자 리서치로 해석되는 경우, 투자 리서치의 독립성을 촉진하기 위해 고안된 법적 요건에 따라 콘텐츠가 의도되지 않았으며, 준비되지 않았다는 점을 인지하고 동의해야 합니다. 따라서, 관련 법률 및 규정에 따른 마케팅 커뮤니케이션이라고 간주됩니다. 여기에서 접근할 수 있는 앞서 언급한 정보에 대한 비독립 투자 리서치 및 위험 경고 알림을 읽고, 이해하시기 바랍니다.

리스크 경고: 고객님의 자본이 위험에 노출 될 수 있습니다. 레버리지 상품은 모든 분들에게 적합하지 않을수 있습니다. 당사의 리스크 공시를 참고하시기 바랍니다.