Legal Fee Tracker: Lawyer's 4,000 hours help Sullivan & Cromwell reach $200 mln mark in FTX case
By David Thomas
June 27 (Reuters) -Even for a busy lawyer at a big corporate law firm, billing close to 11 hours a day on a single case, five days a week for 18 months straight is no easy feat.
That's the average pace Brian Glueckstein has kept up as one of the lead lawyers in the FTX bankruptcy since it began in November 2022, according to court records though April. All those hours — including 342 in December 2022 alone — have helped his law firm Sullivan & Cromwell amass close to $200 million in billings as debtor's counsel in the sprawling case so far.
Sullivan & Cromwell's fee filings illustrate the massive, lucrative task of managing the bankruptcy of a cryptocurrency exchange whose founder Sam Bankman-Fried was sentenced to 25 years in prison for committing one of the biggest financial frauds in U.S. history.
A Delaware bankruptcy judge has approved more than $171.8 million in fees for the New York-founded law firm, with another $26.8 million request pending.
Glueckstein, with a current hourly rate of $2,375, has billed more than 4,000 hours in the bankruptcy, the most of any partner at his firm, according to a Reuters analysis of monthly fee statements. He is one of hundreds of lawyers and staffers from 890-lawyer Sullivan & Cromwell who have billed more than 168,000 hours in the case altogether.
Glueckstein, who joined Sullivan & Cromwell out of New York University School of Law in 2003, did not respond to requests for comment.
A Sullivan & Cromwell spokesperson referred Reuters to its public filings in the case and said that there have been no objections lodged against its fee requests.
As its bankruptcy counsel, Sullivan & Cromwell is advising FTX as it sells assets and pursues legal claims against others in an effort to repay creditors, including its customers.
An FTX spokesperson said the law firm's fees represent "a fraction of the amounts [FTX CEO] John Ray and his team have recovered through their investigation and prosecution of recovery actions."
FTX said this week that it has recovered up to $16 billion to repay customers, including over $12 billion in cash, and it says it will repay all customer claims in full.
Since May 2023, Glueckstein has also been part of a Sullivan & Cromwell team representing fire-protection company Kidde-Fenwal Inc, a Carrier Global subsidiary that filed for bankruptcy last year, billing at least 732 hours in the case. That's an average of about 12 hours a day on the two cases together, five days a week for 11 months.
A spokesperson for Carrier Global did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Fee experts said such a workload for a single lawyer was extreme, but far from unheard of when juggling one or more high-stakes assignments. The intensity required from bankruptcy practitioners depends on the case, and FTX is a "bet-the-company engagement," said Nancy Rapoport, a fee examiner and law professor at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas.
Other experts noted that lawyers at large U.S. law firms often work eye-popping hours, with extreme workloads sometimes considered a badge of success.
"It brings to mind the adage that making partner is a pie-eating contest and the prize for winning is more pie," Georgetown Law professor Adam Levitin said in an email.
Before FTX's collapse, Sullivan & Cromwell had served as an outside law firm for the company and Bankman-Fried. The firm has faced scrutiny and at least one lawsuit over its pre-bankruptcy work from investors who accused it of failing to stop Bankman-Fried's $8 billion fraud.
Sullivan & Cromwell has denied any wrongdoing, and a court-appointed examiner concluded last month that the firm was not complicit in the fraud that caused the cryptocurrency exchange to collapse.
- In other legal fee news, the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday declined to hear a challenge to a $667 million fee award for lawyers at Boies Schiller Flexner, Hausfeld and other law firms that secured a $2.7 billion antitrust settlement with Blue Cross Blue Shield in 2020.
The fee award is among the largest ever in a class action.
- U.S. law firm Motley Rice on Monday appealed its award of $396 million for its work on litigation against the drug industry over the opioid crisis that resulted in $46 billion in nationwide settlements.
The firm did not say how much it was seeking or on what basis it was challenging the award.
(Legal Fee Tracker is a weekly feature exploring attorney compensation awards and disputes in class actions, bankruptcies and other matters. Please send tips or suggestions to D.Thomas@thomsonreuters.com .)
Reporting by David Thomas
Asset collegati
Ultime news
Disclaimer: le entità di XM Group forniscono servizi di sola esecuzione e accesso al nostro servizio di trading online, che permette all'individuo di visualizzare e/o utilizzare i contenuti disponibili sul sito o attraverso di esso; non ha il proposito di modificare o espandere le proprie funzioni, né le modifica o espande. L'accesso e l'utilizzo sono sempre soggetti a: (i) Termini e condizioni; (ii) Avvertenza sui rischi e (iii) Disclaimer completo. Tali contenuti sono perciò forniti a scopo puramente informativo. Nello specifico, ti preghiamo di considerare che i contenuti del nostro servizio di trading online non rappresentano un sollecito né un'offerta ad operare sui mercati finanziari. Il trading su qualsiasi mercato finanziario comporta un notevole livello di rischio per il tuo capitale.
Tutto il materiale pubblicato sul nostro servizio di trading online è unicamente a scopo educativo e informativo, e non contiene (e non dovrebbe essere considerato come contenente) consigli e raccomandazioni di carattere finanziario, di trading o fiscale, né informazioni riguardanti i nostri prezzi di trading, offerte o solleciti riguardanti transazioni che possano coinvolgere strumenti finanziari, oppure promozioni finanziarie da te non richieste.
Tutti i contenuti di terze parti, oltre ai contenuti offerti da XM, siano essi opinioni, news, ricerca, analisi, prezzi, altre informazioni o link a siti di terzi presenti su questo sito, sono forniti "così com'è", e vanno considerati come commenti generali sui mercati; per questo motivo, non possono essere visti come consigli di investimento. Dato che tutti i contenuti sono intesi come ricerche di investimento, devi considerare e accettare che non sono stati preparati né creati seguendo i requisiti normativi pensati per promuovere l'indipendenza delle ricerche di investimento; per questo motivo, questi contenuti devono essere considerati come comunicazioni di marketing in base alle leggi e normative vigenti. Assicurati di avere letto e compreso pienamente la nostra Notifica sulla ricerca di investimento non indipendente e la nostra Informativa sul rischio riguardante le informazioni sopra citate; tali documenti sono consultabili qui.
