LME open-outcry trade lives on as SocGen quit sparks no rush for exits
By Eric Onstad
LONDON, Aug 28 (Reuters) -The future of ring trading on the London Metal Exchange looks assured for now after almost all the firms involved told Reuters they remained committed to open-outcry trading at one of the last venues to still support it.
But with critical mass dropping towards the level at which LME management has said it would suspend the process after Societe Generale said last week it would no longer take part, its longer term outlook is less sure.
The ring has its roots in the early 19th century when the Royal Exchange, the world’s first commodities market, became so crowded that metal merchants gathered at the Jerusalem coffee house on Cornhill in the City to conduct business.
In the 1980s, about 30 firms dealt in the LME ring, which features a circle of padded red leather seats for traders who use arcane hand signals during five-minute bursts of intense trading in copper, aluminium and other metals.
Now, just seven participants remain, and the LME has said the floor will close if the number of ring members falls below six, or if their trading in the second ring falls to less than 75% of last year's level.
The LME, owned by Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Ltd 0388.HK, said on Friday that trading volumes remain above the 75% threshold, but did not say by how much. It declined to comment further.
Several sources said high costs for ring-dealing firms and a global trend towards electronic trade threaten to undermine the minimum number of participants required to keep the age-old trading method afloat.
The loss of the ring, which involves four sessions of trading a day, would be a blow for miners and industrial firms that value floor trading.
They regard open-outcry dealing, used to crystalise official prices for physical deals using a complex structure of multiple forward dates, as absent of speculative influences.
For years, there has been tension between traditional physical users and the financial community that includes hedge funds, speculators and Commodity Trade Advisor investment funds and funds driven by algorithmic programmes.
Many long-standing users see a risk too that an excess of computer-driven speculative flows can distort prices that are key to deals in physical metal.
"It's that second ring close, the official price, that's void of algos, void of CTAs, void of specs, that still has an appeal," said Marc Bailey, CEO of ring-trader Sucden Financial.
QUESTIONS OVER VIABILITY
An outcry from physical LME users saved the ring three years ago when the 147-year-old LME proposed to close the trading floor and join the bulk of other financial exchanges that have moved to pure electronic trading.
The exchange argued that a temporary switch to full digital trading during COVID-19 proved that the ring was not essential.
But the LME eventually compromised and now operates on a hybrid basis, using open-outcry trading for official prices used by physical users as benchmarks for their deals and an electronic system for closing prices.
Longstanding questions about the viability of the ring resurfaced on Aug. 23 when Societe Generale SOGN.PA said it would drop the top-tier membership that allows floor trading.
A Reuters survey showed there is still a commitment to the ring for now by the bulk of existing ring members, backed by miners and companies that use physical metal.
"There are enough people that still want an independent price for physical trading," said Sucden's Bailey.
Marex Group MRX.O also said it would continue ring trading, while StoneX Financial SNEX.O said it had no current plans to change its approach to the ring.
Sources with direct knowledge said Amalgamated Metal Trading, CCBI Global Markets and GF Financial also planned to continue on the LME floor, while Sigma Broking declined to comment.
Ring members must bear the extra cost of having traders both in the office and on the LME floor, which can cost $1 million a year, one industry source estimated.
"It's expensive to maintain, but we're still making money from the ring," said an executive of a ring dealer who declined to be named.
SMALL PLAYER
SocGen was a relatively small player in the ring, and one LME executive estimated the company accounted for only 6% of open-outcry trading. An executive at an LME ring dealer said they expected its ring business to be redistributed to one or more of the remaining brokers.
Some LME members argue that electronic trading worked during COVID-19 and a full shift is inevitable.
"The writing is in the wall," said an industry source. "The ring is actually irrelevant, as those prices were compiled electronically during COVID and no one noticed any difference."
But the ring still has support. One executive at a European company that buys LME metals to make its products said the exchange should create a more viable ring by coming up with more cost-efficient solution.
"Without the ring, the LME is just another raw materials exchange," he said.
Reporting by Eric Onstad; Editing by Veronica Brown and Jan Harvey
Asset collegati
Ultime news
Disclaimer: le entità di XM Group forniscono servizi di sola esecuzione e accesso al nostro servizio di trading online, che permette all'individuo di visualizzare e/o utilizzare i contenuti disponibili sul sito o attraverso di esso; non ha il proposito di modificare o espandere le proprie funzioni, né le modifica o espande. L'accesso e l'utilizzo sono sempre soggetti a: (i) Termini e condizioni; (ii) Avvertenza sui rischi e (iii) Disclaimer completo. Tali contenuti sono perciò forniti a scopo puramente informativo. Nello specifico, ti preghiamo di considerare che i contenuti del nostro servizio di trading online non rappresentano un sollecito né un'offerta ad operare sui mercati finanziari. Il trading su qualsiasi mercato finanziario comporta un notevole livello di rischio per il tuo capitale.
Tutto il materiale pubblicato sul nostro servizio di trading online è unicamente a scopo educativo e informativo, e non contiene (e non dovrebbe essere considerato come contenente) consigli e raccomandazioni di carattere finanziario, di trading o fiscale, né informazioni riguardanti i nostri prezzi di trading, offerte o solleciti riguardanti transazioni che possano coinvolgere strumenti finanziari, oppure promozioni finanziarie da te non richieste.
Tutti i contenuti di terze parti, oltre ai contenuti offerti da XM, siano essi opinioni, news, ricerca, analisi, prezzi, altre informazioni o link a siti di terzi presenti su questo sito, sono forniti "così com'è", e vanno considerati come commenti generali sui mercati; per questo motivo, non possono essere visti come consigli di investimento. Dato che tutti i contenuti sono intesi come ricerche di investimento, devi considerare e accettare che non sono stati preparati né creati seguendo i requisiti normativi pensati per promuovere l'indipendenza delle ricerche di investimento; per questo motivo, questi contenuti devono essere considerati come comunicazioni di marketing in base alle leggi e normative vigenti. Assicurati di avere letto e compreso pienamente la nostra Notifica sulla ricerca di investimento non indipendente e la nostra Informativa sul rischio riguardante le informazioni sopra citate; tali documenti sono consultabili qui.
