US court questions legal basis for net neutrality reinstatement
Adds details of arguments, background in paragraphs 3-11
Internet service providers oppose FCC's action
Three-judge panel hears arguments in case
By David Shepardson
Oct 31 (Reuters) -Federal appellate judges signaled skepticism on Thursday over whether the U.S. Federal Communications Commission has the authority to reinstate landmark net neutrality rules, a move that was challenged by groups representing internet service providers.
A three-judge panel of the Cincinnati-based 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals heard arguments in an industry lawsuit that accused the agency of exceeding its powers in bringing back the net neutrality rules.
The FCC, encouraged by Democratic President Joe Biden, this year revived the rules, which initially were implemented in 2015 by the FCC under Democratic former President Barack Obama but then repealed by the agency in 2017 under Republican former President Donald Trump.
The 6th Circuit in August blocked the FCC from enforcing the rules while the industry's legal challenge plays out.
Net neutrality rules require internet service providers to treat internet data and users equally rather than restricting access, slowing speeds or blocking content for certain users. The rules also forbid special arrangements in which internet service providers give improved network speeds or access to favored users.
The case turns on whether the FCC has the power to reclassify broadband internet as a telecommunications service that would give it sweeping regulatory authority. The FCC voted in April to resume regulatory oversight of broadband internet.
Judge Richard Allen Griffin wondered whether the FCC's changing positions during the past three administrations posed a problem for the commission's legal case.
"If it's a close call, should we not defer to the policy of Congress, which is to not provide for extensive regulation?" Griffin asked FCC Associate General Counsel Jacob Lewis.
Lewis said federal law provides the agency authority to implement net neutrality rules.
"Congress clearly understood that the commission would have to make these calls," Lewis told the judges.
The U.S. telecom industry opposes the net neutrality rules. Major tech companies like Amazon.com AMZN.O, Apple AAPL.O, Alphabet GOOGL.O and Meta Platforms META.O support the rules.
A different 6th Circuit panel put a hold on the FCC's action. In doing so, those judges invoked what is called the "major questions" doctrine, a judicial approach that gives courts broad discretion to invalidate executive agency actions of "vast economic and political significance" unless Congress clearly authorized them in legislation.
"Net neutrality is likely a major question requiring clear congressional authorization," the court wrote in blocking enforcement of the rules.
The net neutrality rules bar internet service providers from blocking or slowing down traffic to certain websites, or engaging in paid prioritization of lawful content, as well as give the FCC new tools to crack down on Chinese telecom companies and the ability to monitor internet service outages.
Jeff Wall, a lawyer for the telecom industry groups, told the judges that the FCC "claims authority that for decades no one thought it had and that Congress has consistently refused to give it." Wall said under the "major questions" doctrine Congress should decide the matter, not a regulatory agency acting on its own.
Judge Raymond Kethledge questioned the FCC's argument about how it classified broadband service.
Kethledge said the case should focus on the statutory text, not the major questions doctrine. "After 16 years as a judge, let’s just talk about the words," Kethledge said.
Reinstating net neutrality has been a priority for Biden, who signed a 2021 executive order encouraging the FCC to reinstate the rules. Under Trump, the FCC had argued that net neutrality rules were unnecessary, blocked innovation and resulted in a decline in network investment by internet service providers.
Reporting by David Shepardson; editing by Jonathan Oatis and Will Dunham
Asset collegati
Ultime news
Disclaimer: le entità di XM Group forniscono servizi di sola esecuzione e accesso al nostro servizio di trading online, che permette all'individuo di visualizzare e/o utilizzare i contenuti disponibili sul sito o attraverso di esso; non ha il proposito di modificare o espandere le proprie funzioni, né le modifica o espande. L'accesso e l'utilizzo sono sempre soggetti a: (i) Termini e condizioni; (ii) Avvertenza sui rischi e (iii) Disclaimer completo. Tali contenuti sono perciò forniti a scopo puramente informativo. Nello specifico, ti preghiamo di considerare che i contenuti del nostro servizio di trading online non rappresentano un sollecito né un'offerta ad operare sui mercati finanziari. Il trading su qualsiasi mercato finanziario comporta un notevole livello di rischio per il tuo capitale.
Tutto il materiale pubblicato sul nostro servizio di trading online è unicamente a scopo educativo e informativo, e non contiene (e non dovrebbe essere considerato come contenente) consigli e raccomandazioni di carattere finanziario, di trading o fiscale, né informazioni riguardanti i nostri prezzi di trading, offerte o solleciti riguardanti transazioni che possano coinvolgere strumenti finanziari, oppure promozioni finanziarie da te non richieste.
Tutti i contenuti di terze parti, oltre ai contenuti offerti da XM, siano essi opinioni, news, ricerca, analisi, prezzi, altre informazioni o link a siti di terzi presenti su questo sito, sono forniti "così com'è", e vanno considerati come commenti generali sui mercati; per questo motivo, non possono essere visti come consigli di investimento. Dato che tutti i contenuti sono intesi come ricerche di investimento, devi considerare e accettare che non sono stati preparati né creati seguendo i requisiti normativi pensati per promuovere l'indipendenza delle ricerche di investimento; per questo motivo, questi contenuti devono essere considerati come comunicazioni di marketing in base alle leggi e normative vigenti. Assicurati di avere letto e compreso pienamente la nostra Notifica sulla ricerca di investimento non indipendente e la nostra Informativa sul rischio riguardante le informazioni sopra citate; tali documenti sono consultabili qui.
