Stripe would be an ugly pattern for Silicon Valley
The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.
By Robert Cyran
NEW YORK, July 16 (Reuters Breakingviews) -Stripe develops software to facilitate payments, but its financial backers are struggling to receive theirs. Started by John and Patrick Collison in 2009, the financial technology company has given no sign of going public soon, making it hard for venture capitalists to cash out. Enter Sequoia Capital with a plan that will buy some time, but one which if applied too often would distort the investment model.
Most successful 15-year-old startups already have been bought by a bigger rival or proceeded with an initial public offering. Stripe hasn’t. To appease limited partners itchy to exit funds from 2009 to 2012, Sequoia is offering to buy up to about $860 million of shares using newer funds.
There’s no obvious reason for an IPO. Although it raised $6.5 billion last year, Stripe says the business generates more cash than it spends. Outside investors enable employees to sell their stakes through tender offers, such as the nearly $700 million one in April. The company avoids regulatory and disclosure hassles while fetching a higher valuation than it probably could in public markets.
Total payment volume at Stripe increased 25% last year, exceeding $1 trillion. European rival Adyen ADYEN.AS processed a similar amount and is expanding just as quickly, but its market capitalization is less than $40 billion. Stripe, at $70 billion, may have more growth ahead of it and new services like automated billing also look promising. In today’s choppy IPO markets, however, it might be hard to persuade investors to pay for the prospects.
Sequoia’s plan indicates confidence. It has invested more than $500 million in Stripe, according to a letter to investors published by Axios this week. For now, though, it has no way to turn a $9 billion return on paper into reality.
New Sequoia funds, including an open-ended one, will buy out investors in older ones. If successful, it will plaster over an idiosyncratic problem. There’s liquidity for those who want it, a fresh opportunity to get behind the Collisons, and Stripe avoids the public spotlight for longer.
The problem would be too many Silicon Valley founders getting similar ideas. If companies like Elon Musk’s SpaceX decide they want to stay private, it would significantly alter the venture capital business. The idea has always been to get in early on up-and-comers and get paid out a few years later. Paying steep fees to own chunks of large, mature companies for an indeterminate period of time is something different altogether.
Follow @rob_cyran on X
CONTEXT NEWS
Venture capital firm Sequoia Capital is using newer funds in an offer to buy as much as $861 million of Stripe shares held by limited partners in its funds established between 2009 and 2012 for $27 apiece, imputing a $70 billion valuation, Axios reported on July 15.
Sequoia said in a letter to investors it had invested a total of $517 million in Stripe, now worth $9.8 billion at the latest valuation.
Number of US tech IPOs has slowed https://reut.rs/4f3iCdc
Editing by Jeffrey Goldfarb and Pranav Kiran
Ultime news
Disclaimer: le entità di XM Group forniscono servizi di sola esecuzione e accesso al nostro servizio di trading online, che permette all'individuo di visualizzare e/o utilizzare i contenuti disponibili sul sito o attraverso di esso; non ha il proposito di modificare o espandere le proprie funzioni, né le modifica o espande. L'accesso e l'utilizzo sono sempre soggetti a: (i) Termini e condizioni; (ii) Avvertenza sui rischi e (iii) Disclaimer completo. Tali contenuti sono perciò forniti a scopo puramente informativo. Nello specifico, ti preghiamo di considerare che i contenuti del nostro servizio di trading online non rappresentano un sollecito né un'offerta ad operare sui mercati finanziari. Il trading su qualsiasi mercato finanziario comporta un notevole livello di rischio per il tuo capitale.
Tutto il materiale pubblicato sul nostro servizio di trading online è unicamente a scopo educativo e informativo, e non contiene (e non dovrebbe essere considerato come contenente) consigli e raccomandazioni di carattere finanziario, di trading o fiscale, né informazioni riguardanti i nostri prezzi di trading, offerte o solleciti riguardanti transazioni che possano coinvolgere strumenti finanziari, oppure promozioni finanziarie da te non richieste.
Tutti i contenuti di terze parti, oltre ai contenuti offerti da XM, siano essi opinioni, news, ricerca, analisi, prezzi, altre informazioni o link a siti di terzi presenti su questo sito, sono forniti "così com'è", e vanno considerati come commenti generali sui mercati; per questo motivo, non possono essere visti come consigli di investimento. Dato che tutti i contenuti sono intesi come ricerche di investimento, devi considerare e accettare che non sono stati preparati né creati seguendo i requisiti normativi pensati per promuovere l'indipendenza delle ricerche di investimento; per questo motivo, questi contenuti devono essere considerati come comunicazioni di marketing in base alle leggi e normative vigenti. Assicurati di avere letto e compreso pienamente la nostra Notifica sulla ricerca di investimento non indipendente e la nostra Informativa sul rischio riguardante le informazioni sopra citate; tali documenti sono consultabili qui.
