Purdue Pharma nears new bankruptcy deal with Sacklers, mediator says
Adds judge's ruling in paragraph 4
Mediator Shelley Chapman reports progress in settlement talks
Judge Sean Lane extends freeze on opioid lawsuits against Sacklers until Dec. 2
Supreme Court ruling prevents Sacklers from being shielded by Purdue's bankruptcy
By Dietrich Knauth
NEW YORK, Oct 31 (Reuters) -Purdue Pharma is close to a new bankruptcy settlement with its owners, members of the wealthy Sackler family, and state and local governments that have filed lawsuits alleging that its painkiller OxyContin spurred a deadly opioid-addiction crisis in the U.S., a court-appointed mediator said on Thursday.
Mediator Shelley Chapman said at a court hearing in White Plains, New York that Purdue has made progress in recent days on a comprehensive deal that would resolve the lawsuits, adding that she would soon file a written report on the results of mediation.
"The parties are getting closer and closer by the day and the remaining issues, in our view, are resolvable," Chapman said.
Based in part on Chapman's comments, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Sean Lane ruled on Thursday that opioid lawsuits against the Sacklers should remain frozen until Dec. 2.
Chapman told the judge that allowing lawsuits to resume would undermine settlement talks and deplete resources that should be reserved for paying opioid creditors.
"You can't make war and peace at the same time," Chapman said. "In order for the mediation to succeed, we need the full, undistracted attention of all the parties."
Purdue was sent back to the drawing board after a landmark U.S. Supreme Court ruling upended its previous bankruptcy plan, which would have granted sweeping legal protections to the Sacklers in exchange for up to $6 billion that would have been spent addressing the harms caused by the opioid epidemic in the U.S.
Chapman did not discuss any terms of the deal. Attorneys representing state and local governments also declined to address the terms under discussion, while saying they were optimistic that a new deal could be reached before Dec. 2, the date when the current litigation stay is scheduled to expire.
The Supreme Court ruled on June 27 that Purdue Pharma's bankruptcy settlement cannot shield the Sacklers, who did not file for bankruptcy themselves, from lawsuits over their role in the opioid epidemic.
Opioid lawsuits against Purdue and the Sacklers have been on hold since 2019, when the Stamford, Connecticut-based drugmaker filed for bankruptcy.
The lawsuits against Purdue and Sackler family members by state and local governments, as well as by individual plaintiffs, have accused them of fueling the crisis through deceptive marketing of its pain medication. The company pleaded guilty to misbranding and fraud charges related to its marketing of OxyContin in 2007 and 2020.
If mediation fails, a court-appointed committee representing Purdue’s creditors has been allowed to sue the Sacklers over claims that the family drained over $11 billion from the company and that their conduct made Purdue liable for other lawsuits.
Reporting by Dietrich Knauth, Editing by Alexia Garamfalvi, William Maclean and Rod Nickel
Ultime news
Disclaimer: le entità di XM Group forniscono servizi di sola esecuzione e accesso al nostro servizio di trading online, che permette all'individuo di visualizzare e/o utilizzare i contenuti disponibili sul sito o attraverso di esso; non ha il proposito di modificare o espandere le proprie funzioni, né le modifica o espande. L'accesso e l'utilizzo sono sempre soggetti a: (i) Termini e condizioni; (ii) Avvertenza sui rischi e (iii) Disclaimer completo. Tali contenuti sono perciò forniti a scopo puramente informativo. Nello specifico, ti preghiamo di considerare che i contenuti del nostro servizio di trading online non rappresentano un sollecito né un'offerta ad operare sui mercati finanziari. Il trading su qualsiasi mercato finanziario comporta un notevole livello di rischio per il tuo capitale.
Tutto il materiale pubblicato sul nostro servizio di trading online è unicamente a scopo educativo e informativo, e non contiene (e non dovrebbe essere considerato come contenente) consigli e raccomandazioni di carattere finanziario, di trading o fiscale, né informazioni riguardanti i nostri prezzi di trading, offerte o solleciti riguardanti transazioni che possano coinvolgere strumenti finanziari, oppure promozioni finanziarie da te non richieste.
Tutti i contenuti di terze parti, oltre ai contenuti offerti da XM, siano essi opinioni, news, ricerca, analisi, prezzi, altre informazioni o link a siti di terzi presenti su questo sito, sono forniti "così com'è", e vanno considerati come commenti generali sui mercati; per questo motivo, non possono essere visti come consigli di investimento. Dato che tutti i contenuti sono intesi come ricerche di investimento, devi considerare e accettare che non sono stati preparati né creati seguendo i requisiti normativi pensati per promuovere l'indipendenza delle ricerche di investimento; per questo motivo, questi contenuti devono essere considerati come comunicazioni di marketing in base alle leggi e normative vigenti. Assicurati di avere letto e compreso pienamente la nostra Notifica sulla ricerca di investimento non indipendente e la nostra Informativa sul rischio riguardante le informazioni sopra citate; tali documenti sono consultabili qui.
