NYSE seeks to end closed-end fund meeting rule, opening divide with investors: Ross Kerber
The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters.
By Ross Kerber
Aug 7 (Reuters) -Corporate annual meetings provideone of the great rituals of business reporting, a rare chance to watch executives and directors speak directly with investors.
But mutual fund shareholder meetings are much more obscure. Most top funds only stage them every few years such as when they need a bylaw tweak. Few investors bother to show up.
So initially I wasn't so excited when a colleague pointed out a rule change the New York Stock Exchange put forward to eliminate required annual meetings for closed-end funds. I changed my mind when I saw the proposal generated pushback from academics and investors who understandit as a bid to prop up underperformers.
Unlike many well-known mutual funds like Fidelity's Magellan FMAGX.N or the Vanguard 500, VOO.P closed-end funds issue a fixed number of shares that can then be bought or sold on exchanges. A funds' trading price can vary above or below its net asset value (NAV).
A recent U.S. trade group report found closed-endfunds generally trade below their NAV due to factors like investors' concerns for tax exposure. As of the end of last year traditional closed-end funds held $249 billion, compared to $33 trillion in open-end mutual funds and ETFs.
NYSE, owned by Intercontinental Exchange,ICE.N says it has the largest share of closed-end fund listings. The discounted share prices have led to challenges from activists looking to put their own directors in place to improve performance, notably the efforts of hedge fund manager Boaz Weinstein's Saba Capital Management against closed-end funds of BlackRock.BLK.N
Now the NYSE's efforts could change both sides' calculations. In a July 3 notice the NYSE proposed to include closed-end funds "among the categories of issuers that are exempt" from the requirement to hold a shareholder meeting each year. Trade group the Investment Company Institute supports the idea, calling the meeting requirement superfluous and expensive.
Yet whatcould be seen as a routine and obscure rule change proposal has Saba and others up in arms. The idea "represents a destruction ... of the very rights shareholders were told they had when they bought these funds" Saba wrote in a comment letter.
The key issue for Saba is that doing away with the regular meetings means investors would have to call a special meeting to replace directors, leaving shareholders "powerless to effect change," Saba's letter states.
Other groups including theSecurities Industry and Financial Markets Association alsosupported the rule change in a comment letter, saying the current system gives a minority investor too much power as the annual meetings "frequently have limited retail investor participation" - a polite way of saying mom-and-pop shareholders don't vote.
But that sort of activism is good for investors, said a group of academic economists, by creating opportunities to sell shares close to a fund's NAV and not at a discount.
The proposal "can be viewed as akin to a request by NYSE to grant all listed CEFs (closed-end funds)a takeover defense" that would be harmful to investors, wrote the group led by Wharton School Professor Daniel Taylor.
NYSE's proposal needs approval from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, as does a similar proposal from Cboe BZX Exchange.CBOE.Z An SEC representative declined to comment.
(This column is part of the Reuters Sustainable Finance newsletter. To receive the newsletter every Wednesday you can sign up here.)
NYSE dominates closed-end fund market https://reut.rs/3WCyA5v
Reporting by Ross Kerber; Editing by David Gregorio
Asset collegati
Ultime news
Disclaimer: le entità di XM Group forniscono servizi di sola esecuzione e accesso al nostro servizio di trading online, che permette all'individuo di visualizzare e/o utilizzare i contenuti disponibili sul sito o attraverso di esso; non ha il proposito di modificare o espandere le proprie funzioni, né le modifica o espande. L'accesso e l'utilizzo sono sempre soggetti a: (i) Termini e condizioni; (ii) Avvertenza sui rischi e (iii) Disclaimer completo. Tali contenuti sono perciò forniti a scopo puramente informativo. Nello specifico, ti preghiamo di considerare che i contenuti del nostro servizio di trading online non rappresentano un sollecito né un'offerta ad operare sui mercati finanziari. Il trading su qualsiasi mercato finanziario comporta un notevole livello di rischio per il tuo capitale.
Tutto il materiale pubblicato sul nostro servizio di trading online è unicamente a scopo educativo e informativo, e non contiene (e non dovrebbe essere considerato come contenente) consigli e raccomandazioni di carattere finanziario, di trading o fiscale, né informazioni riguardanti i nostri prezzi di trading, offerte o solleciti riguardanti transazioni che possano coinvolgere strumenti finanziari, oppure promozioni finanziarie da te non richieste.
Tutti i contenuti di terze parti, oltre ai contenuti offerti da XM, siano essi opinioni, news, ricerca, analisi, prezzi, altre informazioni o link a siti di terzi presenti su questo sito, sono forniti "così com'è", e vanno considerati come commenti generali sui mercati; per questo motivo, non possono essere visti come consigli di investimento. Dato che tutti i contenuti sono intesi come ricerche di investimento, devi considerare e accettare che non sono stati preparati né creati seguendo i requisiti normativi pensati per promuovere l'indipendenza delle ricerche di investimento; per questo motivo, questi contenuti devono essere considerati come comunicazioni di marketing in base alle leggi e normative vigenti. Assicurati di avere letto e compreso pienamente la nostra Notifica sulla ricerca di investimento non indipendente e la nostra Informativa sul rischio riguardante le informazioni sopra citate; tali documenti sono consultabili qui.
