Nvidia has nothing to fear but a lack of fear
The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.
By Robert Cyran
NEW YORK, Sept 4 (Reuters Breakingviews) -Almost $300 billion worth of Nvidia NVDA.O got vaporized on Tuesday. It was the third sell-off in the $2.6 trillion U.S. chipmaker’s shares this year, and like the previous two, it has little basis in industrial reality. The chances are that market volatility and changeable economic data will continue to buffet Nvidia’s stock, but the biggest risk to its valuation could come later, and come from within.
Nvidia is one of the biggest beneficiaries of the race to develop artificial intelligence, as its semiconductors and networking equipment are deployed in data centers used to train and run AI systems. Revenue is expected to double this year to around $125 billion, according to analyst estimates gathered by LSEG. The outlook there hasn’t changed. Giant customers still plan to spend billions on its chips. Meta Platforms META.O, for example, intends to roughly increase its overall capital expenditure this year by around 50%, to $40 billion.
There can still be room for disappointment. The large internet and software firms that form part of its customer base may fail to monetize their AI initiatives enough to justify their $300 billion investment. At Meta, Mark Zuckerberg’s plans for open AI may turn it into a commodity. But there too, nothing has changed.
There are newer threats: the U.S. Department of Justice has accelerated a probe into whether the company unfairly gave preferential pricing and chips to companies that exclusively use Nvidia and shun its rivals, according to Bloomberg. Rival chipmaker Intel INTC.O settled with U.S. regulators over similar issues over a decade ago. But such levies are rarely very damaging. Europe slapped a fine on Intel 15 years ago, yet that case is still ongoing.
If there’s something that should worry investors, it lurks further out – and Intel offers some foreshadowing. That former giant was once the chipmaker to beat. Its peak market capitalization in 2000 of roughly $500 billion is equivalent to nearly $1 trillion in today’s money. But Intel lost its manufacturing edge to specialized manufacturer TSMC 2330.TW and missed out on the shift to chips that power cellphones. Its U.S. settlement played a role, making it easier for upstarts like Nvidia. But that was at root a problem of complacency. Intel stuck to what it knew, longer than it should have.
That kind of risk is hard to price in to a company’s shares, which probably means most investors aren’t pricing it in at all. Andy Grove, Intel’s chief executive just prior to the company’s zenith, said that “only the paranoid survive”. Intel didn’t take him at his word, but Nvidia boss Jensen Huang still can.
Follow @rob_cyran on X
CONTEXT NEWS
Nvida’s stock fell 9.5% on Sept. 3, wiping around $380 billion off the U.S. chipmaker’s market capitalization.
The U.S. Department of Justice sent subpoenas to Nvidia and other companies to investigate whether the chipmaker violated antitrust laws, according to a Bloomberg story on Sept. 3, released after the market closed.
The DOJ is investigating whether Nvidia’s purchase of Run: ai, a software maker, will make it more difficult for customers to use other firm’s chips, and whether Nvidia gives preferential pricing and supply of chips to customers that use Nvidia technology exclusively, according to Bloomberg.
Nvidia's shares have been a wobbly rocket ride https://reut.rs/3XchBav
Editing by John Foley and Pranav Kiran
Asset collegati
Ultime news
Disclaimer: le entità di XM Group forniscono servizi di sola esecuzione e accesso al nostro servizio di trading online, che permette all'individuo di visualizzare e/o utilizzare i contenuti disponibili sul sito o attraverso di esso; non ha il proposito di modificare o espandere le proprie funzioni, né le modifica o espande. L'accesso e l'utilizzo sono sempre soggetti a: (i) Termini e condizioni; (ii) Avvertenza sui rischi e (iii) Disclaimer completo. Tali contenuti sono perciò forniti a scopo puramente informativo. Nello specifico, ti preghiamo di considerare che i contenuti del nostro servizio di trading online non rappresentano un sollecito né un'offerta ad operare sui mercati finanziari. Il trading su qualsiasi mercato finanziario comporta un notevole livello di rischio per il tuo capitale.
Tutto il materiale pubblicato sul nostro servizio di trading online è unicamente a scopo educativo e informativo, e non contiene (e non dovrebbe essere considerato come contenente) consigli e raccomandazioni di carattere finanziario, di trading o fiscale, né informazioni riguardanti i nostri prezzi di trading, offerte o solleciti riguardanti transazioni che possano coinvolgere strumenti finanziari, oppure promozioni finanziarie da te non richieste.
Tutti i contenuti di terze parti, oltre ai contenuti offerti da XM, siano essi opinioni, news, ricerca, analisi, prezzi, altre informazioni o link a siti di terzi presenti su questo sito, sono forniti "così com'è", e vanno considerati come commenti generali sui mercati; per questo motivo, non possono essere visti come consigli di investimento. Dato che tutti i contenuti sono intesi come ricerche di investimento, devi considerare e accettare che non sono stati preparati né creati seguendo i requisiti normativi pensati per promuovere l'indipendenza delle ricerche di investimento; per questo motivo, questi contenuti devono essere considerati come comunicazioni di marketing in base alle leggi e normative vigenti. Assicurati di avere letto e compreso pienamente la nostra Notifica sulla ricerca di investimento non indipendente e la nostra Informativa sul rischio riguardante le informazioni sopra citate; tali documenti sono consultabili qui.