EBay seeks judge's guidance to settle with victims of harassment campaign
By Nate Raymond
July 18 (Reuters) -EBay EBAY.O on Thursday sought court guidance to help it settle a lawsuit by a Massachusetts couple who were the victims of a bizarre stalking and harassment campaign carried out by several of its now-former employees after an online newsletter they published drew the ire of top executives.
The request, made by a lawyer for the e-commerce company during a hearing in Boston, came shortly before a different judge sentenced the last of the seven former eBay workers who had pleaded guilty to participating in the cyberstalking scheme.
Brian Gilbert, who served as senior manager of special operations for eBay's global security team and has been diagnosed with terminal cancer, was sentenced to no prison time and a $20,000 fine by U.S. District Judge William Young.
He was one of the seven ex-eBay workers who were charged in 2020 and who all pleaded guilty to participating in a campaign that prosecutors said aimed to silence David and Ina Steiner, whose newsletter EcommerceBytes had been deemed by top executives to be critical of their company.
Other employees have received sentences of as high as 57 months in prison for their roles in an extensive campaign in 2019 that involved sending the Steiners cockroaches, fly larvae and a bloody Halloween pig mask and surveiling their home in Natick, Massachusetts.
San Jose, California-based eBay agreed in January to pay $3 million under a criminal deferred prosecution agreement. But the company and some ex-eBay executives and employees remain defendants in a separate civil lawsuit by the Steiners.
During a hearing before U.S. District Judge Patti Saris, eBay counsel Jack Pirozzolo of Sidley Austin said the company was seeking to settle the lawsuit.
But he said it became clear during a mediation last month that the parties needed guidance from Saris on a key issue if they were to resolve the case: Whether the Steiners are entitled to seek punitive damages.
Under Massachusetts law, the Steiners would not be entitled to seek punitive damages against eBay, but the Steiners' lawyers, led by Andrew Finkelstein of Finkelstein & Partners, contend California law would govern that damages claim.
"Is this the barrier to settlement?” Saris asked.
"I would not say it's the only barrier but I would say that it became a significant issue in settlement discussions,” Pirozzolo said.
The judge asked the parties to propose a schedule to brief the issue so she could address it before an expected trial next year.
The case is Steiner v. eBay Inc, U.S. District Court, District of Massachusetts, No. 21-cv-11181.
For the Steiners: Andrew Finkelstein of Finkelstein & Partners
For eBay: Jack Pirozzolo of Sidley Austin
Reporting by Nate Raymond in Boston
Asset collegati
Ultime news
Disclaimer: le entità di XM Group forniscono servizi di sola esecuzione e accesso al nostro servizio di trading online, che permette all'individuo di visualizzare e/o utilizzare i contenuti disponibili sul sito o attraverso di esso; non ha il proposito di modificare o espandere le proprie funzioni, né le modifica o espande. L'accesso e l'utilizzo sono sempre soggetti a: (i) Termini e condizioni; (ii) Avvertenza sui rischi e (iii) Disclaimer completo. Tali contenuti sono perciò forniti a scopo puramente informativo. Nello specifico, ti preghiamo di considerare che i contenuti del nostro servizio di trading online non rappresentano un sollecito né un'offerta ad operare sui mercati finanziari. Il trading su qualsiasi mercato finanziario comporta un notevole livello di rischio per il tuo capitale.
Tutto il materiale pubblicato sul nostro servizio di trading online è unicamente a scopo educativo e informativo, e non contiene (e non dovrebbe essere considerato come contenente) consigli e raccomandazioni di carattere finanziario, di trading o fiscale, né informazioni riguardanti i nostri prezzi di trading, offerte o solleciti riguardanti transazioni che possano coinvolgere strumenti finanziari, oppure promozioni finanziarie da te non richieste.
Tutti i contenuti di terze parti, oltre ai contenuti offerti da XM, siano essi opinioni, news, ricerca, analisi, prezzi, altre informazioni o link a siti di terzi presenti su questo sito, sono forniti "così com'è", e vanno considerati come commenti generali sui mercati; per questo motivo, non possono essere visti come consigli di investimento. Dato che tutti i contenuti sono intesi come ricerche di investimento, devi considerare e accettare che non sono stati preparati né creati seguendo i requisiti normativi pensati per promuovere l'indipendenza delle ricerche di investimento; per questo motivo, questi contenuti devono essere considerati come comunicazioni di marketing in base alle leggi e normative vigenti. Assicurati di avere letto e compreso pienamente la nostra Notifica sulla ricerca di investimento non indipendente e la nostra Informativa sul rischio riguardante le informazioni sopra citate; tali documenti sono consultabili qui.
