CVS surgery would provide little if any relief
The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.
By Robert Cyran
NEW YORK, Oct 1 (Reuters Breakingviews) -It’s easier to diagnose what ails CVS Health CVS.N than it is to prescribe a cure. Multiple profit warnings from the $78 billion healthcare conglomerate have raised doubts about its strategy. It may now be considering a breakup, but such radical surgery probably would bring little if any relief.
The company’s flagship drugstore chain is one painful problem. Insurance providers have been squeezing pharmacists as online marketplaces such as Amazon.com AMZN.O, mail-order rivals and big retailers including Walmart WMT.N muscle into the business. This competition is a big reason why CVS has generated a dismal 2% total shareholder return, including reinvested dividends, since 2015. It’s only slightly comforting that peer Rite Aid went bankrupt and Walgreen Boots Alliance WBA.O shareholders lost 80% of their investment over the same 10-year span.
CVS avoided an equally disastrous fate by diversifying. It paid $70 billion for insurer Aetna in 2018, following up with the $11 billion acquisition of primary care provider Oak Street and an $8 billion deal for Signify Health, which tends to patients at home. The M&A binge has been of dubious value, however. The combined purchase prices exceed the company’s current market capitalization, and it is now larded with $50 billion of net debt, twice as much as before the acquisitions, at nearly 5 times expected 2025 EBITDA, according to estimates gathered by LSEG.
Moreover, the latest struggles at CVS have centered around insurance. Boss Karen Lynch expanded the Medicare Advantage business, under which private insurers are paid by the U.S. government to manage healthcare benefits for retirees, at just the wrong time. Customers started using it more than expected while federal officials cracked down on reimbursements.
Carving up the company is now under consideration as part of a possible strategic shakeup, according to Reuters, amid pressure from at least one investor, per the Wall Street Journal. Its insurance business and ancillary services would generate $10 billion of adjusted operating profit this year, assuming second-half results match the first half. Rival Cigna CI.N trades at 10 times, implying Aetna-plus would be worth $100 billion.
Double the retail arm’s $2.4 billion of operating profit through June and put it on the same 9 times multiple commanded by Walgreens, and it would be worth nearly $45 billion. Together, the implied uplift for the enterprise would only be about 10%, including debt, which hardly justifies the risky operation. A better prescription for Lynch would be to stop doing overpriced deals and instead find ways to nurse the wounded units back to health.
Follow @rob_cyran on X
CONTEXT NEWS
CVS Health is exploring strategic options including breaking up the company by separating its pharmacy and insurance units, Reuters reported on Sept. 30, citing unnamed sources.
Hedge fund Glenview Capital has built a 1% stake in the company, according to an article published on the same day by the Wall Street Journal.
CVS shares have gone nowhere for a decade https://reut.rs/3Y54DNq
Editing by Jeffrey Goldfarb and Pranav Kiran
Asset collegati
Ultime news
Disclaimer: le entità di XM Group forniscono servizi di sola esecuzione e accesso al nostro servizio di trading online, che permette all'individuo di visualizzare e/o utilizzare i contenuti disponibili sul sito o attraverso di esso; non ha il proposito di modificare o espandere le proprie funzioni, né le modifica o espande. L'accesso e l'utilizzo sono sempre soggetti a: (i) Termini e condizioni; (ii) Avvertenza sui rischi e (iii) Disclaimer completo. Tali contenuti sono perciò forniti a scopo puramente informativo. Nello specifico, ti preghiamo di considerare che i contenuti del nostro servizio di trading online non rappresentano un sollecito né un'offerta ad operare sui mercati finanziari. Il trading su qualsiasi mercato finanziario comporta un notevole livello di rischio per il tuo capitale.
Tutto il materiale pubblicato sul nostro servizio di trading online è unicamente a scopo educativo e informativo, e non contiene (e non dovrebbe essere considerato come contenente) consigli e raccomandazioni di carattere finanziario, di trading o fiscale, né informazioni riguardanti i nostri prezzi di trading, offerte o solleciti riguardanti transazioni che possano coinvolgere strumenti finanziari, oppure promozioni finanziarie da te non richieste.
Tutti i contenuti di terze parti, oltre ai contenuti offerti da XM, siano essi opinioni, news, ricerca, analisi, prezzi, altre informazioni o link a siti di terzi presenti su questo sito, sono forniti "così com'è", e vanno considerati come commenti generali sui mercati; per questo motivo, non possono essere visti come consigli di investimento. Dato che tutti i contenuti sono intesi come ricerche di investimento, devi considerare e accettare che non sono stati preparati né creati seguendo i requisiti normativi pensati per promuovere l'indipendenza delle ricerche di investimento; per questo motivo, questi contenuti devono essere considerati come comunicazioni di marketing in base alle leggi e normative vigenti. Assicurati di avere letto e compreso pienamente la nostra Notifica sulla ricerca di investimento non indipendente e la nostra Informativa sul rischio riguardante le informazioni sopra citate; tali documenti sono consultabili qui.
