Companies ask US judiciary group to force lawsuit funding disclosures
Adds comment in paragraphs 11, 12 from funding advocate
By Mike Scarcella
Oct 3 (Reuters) -More than 100 major companies from the technology, pharmaceutical, automotive and other sectors have urged the U.S. judiciary to adopt a nationwide rule requiring disclosure of third-party litigation funding in lawsuits.
Companies including Amazon.com, Google, Cisco, Meta, Comcast, Exxon, Zurich, Eli Lilly, Bayer, Ford, Pfizer and Novartis submitted the letter on Wednesday to the federal courts’ Advisory Committee on Civil Rules, in advance of a hearing by the committee next week.
Litigation funding, where a financier backs clients' cases in exchange for a cut of an eventual settlement or judgment, has become a multibillion-dollar industry in recent years.
Some U.S. courts require disclosure of outside funding, but there is no uniformity across the judiciary.
The companies either had no immediate comment or did not immediately respond to a request for comment about the letter, which was organized by defense-focused Lawyers for Civil Justice.
Some of the signatories have previously expressed concern about litigation funding and the need for greater oversight. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce and other business groups have for years called on standardizing funding disclosure rules.
The Chamber's Institute for Legal Reform submitted a letter on Wednesday to the advisory committee urging greater oversight, and Republican U.S. Senators John Cornyn and Thom Tillis expressed a similar view.
The companies’ letter said disclosures about financial backers in cases are necessary to allow defendants to make informed decisions about the course of litigation. They said outside funding “fundamentally alters the dynamics and has a major impact on whether the dispute can be resolved through settlement.”
Christopher Bogart, chief executive of litigation funder Burford Capital, in a statement on Thursday questioned the motives of the companies that signed onto the letter and rejected their call for mandatory disclosures.
"What they want is to keep their unfair advantage in the justice system and to drive up costs for anyone who sues them – which is exactly what they do whenever they find out about the identity of a litigation funder,” Bogart said.
The International Legal Finance Association, a Washington, D.C. group that advocates for the funding industry, in a statement on Thursday criticized the drive for a nationwide disclosure rule.
"These companies yet again are attempting to further tilt the justice system in their own favor by forcing their challengers to disclose privileged information about their legal strategies," Shannon Campagna, the group's acting executive director, said.
The judiciary's civil rules advisory committee is meeting on Oct. 10 in Washington, D.C. The panel said its agenda includes a discussion of amending court rules to require disclosure of litigation funding. No formal proposal is up for a vote.
A representative for the committee declined to comment.
The committee last discussed litigation funding in late 2021.
Read more:
Louisiana law places new rules on litigation funders
Litigation funder Burford fights order denying bid to take over Sysco cases
US litigation funding in 'state of flux' as deal commitments dip, says report
Litigation funders deployed $3.2 bln in U.S. investments last year - report
Reporting by Mike Scarcella
Asset collegati
Ultime news
Disclaimer: le entità di XM Group forniscono servizi di sola esecuzione e accesso al nostro servizio di trading online, che permette all'individuo di visualizzare e/o utilizzare i contenuti disponibili sul sito o attraverso di esso; non ha il proposito di modificare o espandere le proprie funzioni, né le modifica o espande. L'accesso e l'utilizzo sono sempre soggetti a: (i) Termini e condizioni; (ii) Avvertenza sui rischi e (iii) Disclaimer completo. Tali contenuti sono perciò forniti a scopo puramente informativo. Nello specifico, ti preghiamo di considerare che i contenuti del nostro servizio di trading online non rappresentano un sollecito né un'offerta ad operare sui mercati finanziari. Il trading su qualsiasi mercato finanziario comporta un notevole livello di rischio per il tuo capitale.
Tutto il materiale pubblicato sul nostro servizio di trading online è unicamente a scopo educativo e informativo, e non contiene (e non dovrebbe essere considerato come contenente) consigli e raccomandazioni di carattere finanziario, di trading o fiscale, né informazioni riguardanti i nostri prezzi di trading, offerte o solleciti riguardanti transazioni che possano coinvolgere strumenti finanziari, oppure promozioni finanziarie da te non richieste.
Tutti i contenuti di terze parti, oltre ai contenuti offerti da XM, siano essi opinioni, news, ricerca, analisi, prezzi, altre informazioni o link a siti di terzi presenti su questo sito, sono forniti "così com'è", e vanno considerati come commenti generali sui mercati; per questo motivo, non possono essere visti come consigli di investimento. Dato che tutti i contenuti sono intesi come ricerche di investimento, devi considerare e accettare che non sono stati preparati né creati seguendo i requisiti normativi pensati per promuovere l'indipendenza delle ricerche di investimento; per questo motivo, questi contenuti devono essere considerati come comunicazioni di marketing in base alle leggi e normative vigenti. Assicurati di avere letto e compreso pienamente la nostra Notifica sulla ricerca di investimento non indipendente e la nostra Informativa sul rischio riguardante le informazioni sopra citate; tali documenti sono consultabili qui.
