Becton Dickinson agrees to settle about 38,000 hernia mesh suits
By Brendan Pierson
Oct 3 (Reuters) -Becton Dickinson BDX.N has agreed to resolve nearly all U.S. lawsuits by people who say they were injured by its hernia repair mesh, about 38,000 cases, in an unusual settlement overseen jointly by state and federal courts, promising an end to litigation stretching back almost two decades.
Terms of the settlement, which the company announced on Wednesday, were not disclosed. BD said the amount was a "large majority" of what it had already set aside for product liability litigation, which was $1.7 billion according to its last quarterly report.
The company said the payouts would take place over several years, with the first before the end of this year.
Almost 25,000 of the cases are centralized in federal court in Columbus, Ohio, with the remainder centralized in state court in Providence, Rhode Island. Plaintiffs will be able to opt out of the settlement, though plaintiffs' lawyers said they expected a very high rate of participation.
BD said it did not admit wrongdoing and would defend itself against any cases by plaintiffs who do not take part in the settlement.
Tim O'Brien of Levin Papantonio and Kelsey Stokes of Fleming Nolen & Jez, lead lawyers for the federal court plaintiffs, said in a joint statement that they were "pleased that the global resolution and resulting process will afford so many individuals a measure of justice."
Don Migliori of Motley Rice, a lead attorney for the plaintiffs in Rhode Island, said that while there have been combined state and federal settlements in mass tort litigation before, the degree of coordination between federal and state courts and attorneys in the mesh cases was unique.
Special masters appointed by both courts will work together to administer claims, and the claims process will be substantially the same for plaintiffs no matter where their case is pending, according to Migliori.
"I think this is the first truly comprehensive effort to have the two judges work together," he said.
The first hernia mesh cases were filed in 2006 in state court in Rhode Island, where hernia mesh maker Davol was headquartered. BD bought Davol's parent company, C.R. Bard, in 2017.
The products at issue are flexible mesh made of polypropylene that are implanted to repair hernias. Plaintiffs say their mesh implants degraded in their bodies and caused a variety of injuries, including infection, chronic pain and organ damage.
Of four cases that went to trial, three resulted in verdicts for the plaintiffs - for $255,000 and $500,000 in federal court, and $4.8 million in state court. The company won another trial, which was in federal court.
The federal MDL is In re: Davol Inc/C.R. Bard Inc Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, No. 18-md-02846.
The Rhode Island litigation is In re: Davol/C.R. Bard hernia mesh multi-case management, Rhode Island Superior Court, No. PC-2018-9999.
For the plaintiffs: Tim O'Brien of Levin Papantonio and Kelsey Stokes, Fleming Nolen & Jez in Ohio; Don Migliori and Jonathan Orent of Motley Rice in Rhode Island
For BD: Michael Brown of Reed Smith
Read more:
R.I. jury orders Becton Dickinson to pay $4.8 mln in hernia mesh trial
Becton Dickinson ordered to pay $255k in hernia mesh trial
(Reporting By Brendan Pierson in New York)
</body></html>Asset collegati
Ultime news
Disclaimer: le entità di XM Group forniscono servizi di sola esecuzione e accesso al nostro servizio di trading online, che permette all'individuo di visualizzare e/o utilizzare i contenuti disponibili sul sito o attraverso di esso; non ha il proposito di modificare o espandere le proprie funzioni, né le modifica o espande. L'accesso e l'utilizzo sono sempre soggetti a: (i) Termini e condizioni; (ii) Avvertenza sui rischi e (iii) Disclaimer completo. Tali contenuti sono perciò forniti a scopo puramente informativo. Nello specifico, ti preghiamo di considerare che i contenuti del nostro servizio di trading online non rappresentano un sollecito né un'offerta ad operare sui mercati finanziari. Il trading su qualsiasi mercato finanziario comporta un notevole livello di rischio per il tuo capitale.
Tutto il materiale pubblicato sul nostro servizio di trading online è unicamente a scopo educativo e informativo, e non contiene (e non dovrebbe essere considerato come contenente) consigli e raccomandazioni di carattere finanziario, di trading o fiscale, né informazioni riguardanti i nostri prezzi di trading, offerte o solleciti riguardanti transazioni che possano coinvolgere strumenti finanziari, oppure promozioni finanziarie da te non richieste.
Tutti i contenuti di terze parti, oltre ai contenuti offerti da XM, siano essi opinioni, news, ricerca, analisi, prezzi, altre informazioni o link a siti di terzi presenti su questo sito, sono forniti "così com'è", e vanno considerati come commenti generali sui mercati; per questo motivo, non possono essere visti come consigli di investimento. Dato che tutti i contenuti sono intesi come ricerche di investimento, devi considerare e accettare che non sono stati preparati né creati seguendo i requisiti normativi pensati per promuovere l'indipendenza delle ricerche di investimento; per questo motivo, questi contenuti devono essere considerati come comunicazioni di marketing in base alle leggi e normative vigenti. Assicurati di avere letto e compreso pienamente la nostra Notifica sulla ricerca di investimento non indipendente e la nostra Informativa sul rischio riguardante le informazioni sopra citate; tali documenti sono consultabili qui.
