Another US law firm reaches data breach settlement as cyber risks mount
Updated to include approval of Orrick settlement in paragraph 6.
By Sara Merken
Nov 8 (Reuters) -Florida business law firm Gunster has agreed to pay $8.5 million to resolve a proposed class action over a 2022 data breach that allegedly exposed the personal and health information of thousands of people.
Lawyers for the plaintiffs submitted the proposed settlement in Florida federal court on Thursday. It would resolve one of two cases filed this year against West Palm Beach-founded Gunster over a data security incident that allegedly compromised the personal data of nearly 10,000 people, including former and current clients and employees.
The agreement is subject to approval by U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon. Gunster has denied the allegations and did not admit wrongdoing.
A Gunster representative on Friday said the firm will not comment on pending litigation. The firm's outside lawyers and a lawyer for the plaintiffs did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
The legal industry has been the target of growing cybersecurity attacks, including against law firms that often possess valuable confidential client information.
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe in April reached an $8 million deal to settle a lawsuit over abreach that allegedly compromised personal data held by the firm on more than 600,000 people. A federal judge approved that settlement on Friday, according to an attorney for the plaintiffs.
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner and snack food giant Mondelez reached a tentative $750,000 settlement in another data breach case last month.
The U.S. federal judiciary on Wednesday issued warnings about emails mimicking notifications of electronic court filings that seek to lure attorney recipients to a malicious website with computer viruses.
Plaintiff Mary Jane Whalen, a New York resident and former Gunster client, and plaintiff Christine Rona, a New York resident who was employed by Gunster to give healthcare services to the firm's high net worth clients, alleged in a complaint that Gunster failed to take adequate measures to protect personal information, among other claims.
Personal and sensitive information such as names, dates of birth, Social Security and banking information was "exfiltrated by cybercriminals" from the firm, the complaint said. Gunster in April issued data breach notifications that said there was unauthorized access to its document management file system.
The complaint alleged Gunster was likely a target because it is a large law firm that collects personal information and creates and maintains entities for wealthy clients.
Judge Cannon on Tuesday paused the other case against Gunster pending approval of the settlement.
The case is Whalen et al v. Gunster, Yoakley & Steward, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, No. 9:24-CV-80612.
For the plaintiffs: John Yanchunis of Morgan & Morgan and Brian Murray of Glancy Prongay & Murray
For Gunster: Kristine Brown of Alston & Bird and Jacqueline Arango of Akerman
Reporting by Sara Merken
Asset collegati
Ultime news
Disclaimer: le entità di XM Group forniscono servizi di sola esecuzione e accesso al nostro servizio di trading online, che permette all'individuo di visualizzare e/o utilizzare i contenuti disponibili sul sito o attraverso di esso; non ha il proposito di modificare o espandere le proprie funzioni, né le modifica o espande. L'accesso e l'utilizzo sono sempre soggetti a: (i) Termini e condizioni; (ii) Avvertenza sui rischi e (iii) Disclaimer completo. Tali contenuti sono perciò forniti a scopo puramente informativo. Nello specifico, ti preghiamo di considerare che i contenuti del nostro servizio di trading online non rappresentano un sollecito né un'offerta ad operare sui mercati finanziari. Il trading su qualsiasi mercato finanziario comporta un notevole livello di rischio per il tuo capitale.
Tutto il materiale pubblicato sul nostro servizio di trading online è unicamente a scopo educativo e informativo, e non contiene (e non dovrebbe essere considerato come contenente) consigli e raccomandazioni di carattere finanziario, di trading o fiscale, né informazioni riguardanti i nostri prezzi di trading, offerte o solleciti riguardanti transazioni che possano coinvolgere strumenti finanziari, oppure promozioni finanziarie da te non richieste.
Tutti i contenuti di terze parti, oltre ai contenuti offerti da XM, siano essi opinioni, news, ricerca, analisi, prezzi, altre informazioni o link a siti di terzi presenti su questo sito, sono forniti "così com'è", e vanno considerati come commenti generali sui mercati; per questo motivo, non possono essere visti come consigli di investimento. Dato che tutti i contenuti sono intesi come ricerche di investimento, devi considerare e accettare che non sono stati preparati né creati seguendo i requisiti normativi pensati per promuovere l'indipendenza delle ricerche di investimento; per questo motivo, questi contenuti devono essere considerati come comunicazioni di marketing in base alle leggi e normative vigenti. Assicurati di avere letto e compreso pienamente la nostra Notifica sulla ricerca di investimento non indipendente e la nostra Informativa sul rischio riguardante le informazioni sopra citate; tali documenti sono consultabili qui.
