XM n’offre pas ses services aux résidents des États-Unis d’Amérique.

Politically toxic inflation may curb Trump agenda: Mike Dolan



<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head><title>COLUMN-Politically toxic inflation may curb Trump agenda: Mike Dolan</title></head><body>

By Mike Dolan

LONDON, Nov 6 (Reuters) -If inflation is as politically toxic as this week's resounding U.S. election result suggests, the presumed impact of his economic policy proposals should make President Donald Trump hesitate on his return to the White House.

The scale of the Republican candidate's comprehensive victory laid waste to pre-election polling and predictions of a tight state-by-state battle. And it left many wondering why a still-booming economy near full employment counted for so little in appraising the incumbent Democrats.

After all, the state of the economy was cited as the most or second-most important issue for the majority of voters in exit polls released on Tuesday.

But when voters said "economy", it masked the emphasis on "inflation". Many Americans still appear to blame the Democrats for the years of high inflation that squeezed household budgets following the pandemic, even though that inflation rate was clearly exaggerated by global events and has fallen back sharply this year.

But as is always the case with inflation, containment doesn't reverse prior price gains. It merely slows the pace of their onward march. The broad consumer price index is up more than 20% over the past four years. And there is also research showing that consumption baskets adjusted for households in the lowest two income deciles are up almost twice that, substantially outpacing their wage gains.

That's not to say inflation, or even the economy at large, was the only reason for Trump's win. But Edison's exit polling data showed 45% of voters across the country said their family's financial situation was worse today than four years ago, compared with just 20% in 2020.

And the economy was also the most routinely cited explanation for President Joe Biden's persistently low approval ratings for much of his tenure.

So as successful as the disinflation process has been over the last year and as strong as the economy appears otherwise, the political damage to the Vice President Kamala Harris' bid appears to have been done long before she entered the race.


UNFORGIVING

Considering the public's unforgiving inflation aversion, it seems odd then that voters opted so strongly for a proposed agenda that many economists assume will spur inflation once again.

Trump's sweeping global tariff proposals and looser fiscal policy - if implemented - are widely expected to rekindle consumer price rises.

"A blanket 10-20% implementation of tariffs on all trading partners by a Trump administration and a minimum of 60% import tariffs on China would likely be inflationary, both on producer prices and on consumer prices," said Zehrid Osmani, portfolio manager at Franklin Templeton's Martin Currie unit.

What's more, Trump's draconian anti-immigration stance could add more fuel to prices by tightening labor markets once more and spurring wages.

"The most inflationary aspect of Trump's program is his desire to withdraw millions of immigrant workers from the job market, which is already under pressure," said Edmond de Rothschild AM's Michael Nizard.

And financial markets reflect these concerns. U.S. Treasury bond yields surged following the election result on Wednesday, and one-year inflation swaps USIL1YF1Y=R rose more than 10 basis points to top 2.6% for the first time in more than a year.

In response, futures markets started pricing in one fewer Federal Reserve rate cut next year, and the dollar soared - likely to the chagrin of soft dollar advocates like many on Trump's team.


COOL THE ENGINES

But given the potentially dire political consequences of aggravating inflation, might Trump's re-flationary agenda be tempered once reality sets in for the new administration?

Some think that may just be what will happen and are cautioning financial markets to cool their engines for now.

"There is the potential for Trump to not walk the talk," said Martin Currie's Osmani.

And Eurizon SLJ's Stephen Jen also doubts we'll see much of the Trump tariff plans, given the impact on "the single-biggest complaint the voters have".

"If inflation has proven to be so politically poisonous, why would Trump knowingly repeat the exact same mistakes he is accusing the Biden administration of having committed?" Jen wrote on election eve. "It makes zero sense to me."

Trump 1.0 has a track record on that, however, even if the broader economic backdrop in 2016-2020 was very different from what we're seeing today.

Whatever eventually happens, inflation has proven itself to be an uncomfortable political bedfellow - and politicians home and abroad may now be far more cautious about re-awakening it.

The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters


Trump wins White House https://tmsnrt.rs/4feZo46

US House vote still undecided https://tmsnrt.rs/40A00ws

U.S. federal deficit grew in 2024 https://reut.rs/4eNQwSN

Barclays chart on Trump tariff plans in historical context https://tmsnrt.rs/4fzDOaj

Markets react to Trump U.S. election win https://reut.rs/3CfrDB3

U.S. yields hit multi-month highs on likely Trump win https://reut.rs/3AjB2ah

US inflation expectations creep higher after election https://tmsnrt.rs/3UA4qQ7

A weaker yuan could mitigate the impact of tariffs https://reut.rs/4feyycn


by Mike Dolan; editing by David Evans

</body></html>

Avertissement : Les entités de XM Group proposent à notre plateforme de trading en ligne un service d'exécution uniquement, autorisant une personne à consulter et/ou à utiliser le contenu disponible sur ou via le site internet, qui n'a pas pour but de modifier ou d'élargir cette situation. De tels accès et utilisation sont toujours soumis aux : (i) Conditions générales ; (ii) Avertissements sur les risques et (iii) Avertissement complet. Un tel contenu n'est par conséquent fourni que pour information générale. En particulier, sachez que les contenus de notre plateforme de trading en ligne ne sont ni une sollicitation ni une offre de participation à toute transaction sur les marchés financiers. Le trading sur les marchés financiers implique un niveau significatif de risques pour votre capital.

Tout le matériel publié dans notre Centre de trading en ligne est destiné à des fins de formation / d'information uniquement et ne contient pas – et ne doit pas être considéré comme contenant – des conseils et recommandations en matière de finance, de fiscalité des investissements ou de trading, ou un enregistrement de nos prix de trading ou une offre, une sollicitation, une transaction à propos de tout instrument financier ou bien des promotions financières non sollicitées à votre égard.

Tout contenu tiers, de même que le contenu préparé par XM, tels que les opinions, actualités, études, analyses, prix, autres informations ou liens vers des sites tiers contenus sur ce site internet sont fournis "tels quels", comme commentaires généraux sur le marché et ne constituent pas des conseils en investissement. Dans la mesure où tout contenu est considéré comme de la recherche en investissement, vous devez noter et accepter que le contenu n'a pas été conçu ni préparé conformément aux exigences légales visant à promouvoir l'indépendance de la recherche en investissement et, en tant que tel, il serait considéré comme une communication marketing selon les lois et réglementations applicables. Veuillez vous assurer que vous avez lu et compris notre Avis sur la recherche en investissement non indépendante et notre avertissement sur les risques concernant les informations susdites, qui peuvent consultés ici.

Avertissement sur les risques : votre capital est à risque. Les produits à effet de levier ne sont pas recommandés pour tous. Veuillez consulter notre Divulgation des risques