Victims of eBay harassment campaign can seek punitive damages, US judge rules
By Nate Raymond
Nov 1 (Reuters) -A Massachusetts couple subjected by eBay employees to a bizarre harassment campaign after an online newsletter they published drew the ire of executives can seek punitive damages on some of their claims against the company, though not some of the "most distressing" ones, a federal judge ruled on Friday.
The ruling by U.S. District Judge Patti Saris in Boston sought to clear up a legal question that the e-commerce company's lawyers said had been a sticking point in talks to settle the lawsuit by David and Ina Steiner, who it said were already seeking more than $12 million in economic damages.
Lawyers for the Steiners and eBay did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Seven former eBay workers have pleaded guilty and received sentences of as high as 57 months in prison for their roles in an extensive campaign that took place in 2019 that involved sending the Steiners cockroaches, fly larvae and a bloody Halloween pig mask, and surveilling their home in Natick, Massachusetts.
Prosecutors say the employees did so in order to silence them after senior executives deemed the Steiners' newsletter, EcommerceBytes, critical of eBay.
The San Jose, California-based company agreed in January to pay $3 million under a deferred prosecution agreement. But the company and some ex-eBay executives and employees remain defendants in a separate civil lawsuit by the Steiners.
During a hearing in July, a lawyer for eBay, Jack Pirozzolo of Sidley Austin, had told Saris that the company was seeking to settle the case but that it had become clear during discussions that they needed guidance from the judge on whether Steiners were entitled to seek punitive damages.
Under Massachusetts law, the Steiners would not be entitled to seek punitive damages against eBay. But the Steiners' lawyers, led by Andrew Finkelstein of Finkelstein & Partners, argued California law should apply to their damages claim.
Saris on Friday concluded the "most distressing conduct" underlying the Steiners' claims of trespass, false imprisonment, and Massachusetts Civil Rights Act violations occurred in Massachusetts, foreclosing the availability of punitive damages.
Those claims concerned actions by eBay employees who traveled to Natick to engage in surveillance of the couple and vandalism of their property, which the Steiners said exacerbated their fear for personal safety.
But Saris said the couple's other claims of intentional infliction of emotional distress and civil conspiracy covered not just the stalking and surveillance but also a broader range of conduct that was carried out online from eBay's California headquarters.
"California’s countervailing interest in deterring such malicious and extreme conduct by its corporate domiciles prevails since the most significant of the unlawful conduct took place within its borders," Saris wrote.
The case is Steiner v. eBay Inc, U.S. District Court, District of Massachusetts, No. 21-cv-11181.
For the Steiners: Andrew Finkelstein of Finkelstein & Partners
For eBay: Jack Pirozzolo of Sidley Austin
Reporting by Nate Raymond in Boston
Actifs liés
Dernières actualités
Avertissement : Les entités de XM Group proposent à notre plateforme de trading en ligne un service d'exécution uniquement, autorisant une personne à consulter et/ou à utiliser le contenu disponible sur ou via le site internet, qui n'a pas pour but de modifier ou d'élargir cette situation. De tels accès et utilisation sont toujours soumis aux : (i) Conditions générales ; (ii) Avertissements sur les risques et (iii) Avertissement complet. Un tel contenu n'est par conséquent fourni que pour information générale. En particulier, sachez que les contenus de notre plateforme de trading en ligne ne sont ni une sollicitation ni une offre de participation à toute transaction sur les marchés financiers. Le trading sur les marchés financiers implique un niveau significatif de risques pour votre capital.
Tout le matériel publié dans notre Centre de trading en ligne est destiné à des fins de formation / d'information uniquement et ne contient pas – et ne doit pas être considéré comme contenant – des conseils et recommandations en matière de finance, de fiscalité des investissements ou de trading, ou un enregistrement de nos prix de trading ou une offre, une sollicitation, une transaction à propos de tout instrument financier ou bien des promotions financières non sollicitées à votre égard.
Tout contenu tiers, de même que le contenu préparé par XM, tels que les opinions, actualités, études, analyses, prix, autres informations ou liens vers des sites tiers contenus sur ce site internet sont fournis "tels quels", comme commentaires généraux sur le marché et ne constituent pas des conseils en investissement. Dans la mesure où tout contenu est considéré comme de la recherche en investissement, vous devez noter et accepter que le contenu n'a pas été conçu ni préparé conformément aux exigences légales visant à promouvoir l'indépendance de la recherche en investissement et, en tant que tel, il serait considéré comme une communication marketing selon les lois et réglementations applicables. Veuillez vous assurer que vous avez lu et compris notre Avis sur la recherche en investissement non indépendante et notre avertissement sur les risques concernant les informations susdites, qui peuvent consultés ici.
