US court blocks transfer of SpaceX lawsuit against NLRB, for now
By Daniel Wiessner
Aug 12 (Reuters) -SpaceX's challenge to the structure of the National Labor Relations Board will remain in Texas federal court for now, after a U.S. appeals court overturned a decision that would have transferred the rocket maker's lawsuit to California.
A 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel in a two-sentence order on Friday vacated a July decision by U.S. District Judge Rolando Olvera refusing to reconsider an earlier ruling transferring the case from his Brownsville, Texas, court to Los Angeles.
The appeals court issued its decision without prejudice, however, citing a related appeal that is still pending. That means the NLRB can again move to transfer the lawsuit to California, where SpaceX is based and the company is facing an administrative board case claiming it illegally fired engineers critical of CEO Elon Musk.
The 5th Circuit is considering SpaceX's separate claims that Olvera improperly failed to rule on the company's request to pause the NLRB case pending the outcome of the lawsuit. The court in May temporarily blocked the board case from proceeding while it considers SpaceX's appeal.
An NLRB spokeswoman declined to comment. SpaceX did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The lawsuit filed in January was among the first in a growing number of challenges to the NLRB's in-house enforcement proceedings, in which administrative law judges and then the five-member board appointed by the president hear unfair labor practice claims brought by the board's general counsel, who acts as a prosecutor.
SpaceX says that administrative judges and board members are improperly insulated from at-will removal by the U.S. president and that NLRB proceedings violate the separation of powers and the company's right to a jury trial under the U.S. Constitution.
The board is facing similar claims in cases involving Amazon.com, Starbucks, Trader Joe's, pipeline operator Energy Transfer, a Michigan hospital operator, a small Missouri bank, and a film producer, among others.
SpaceX filed a second lawsuit in Texas federal court in April stemming from a separate NLRB complaint accusing the company of forcing laid-off workers to sign severance agreements that include illegal provisions. U.S. District Judge Alan Albright in Waco in July blocked the board case from moving forward pending the outcome of the lawsuit.
The NLRB has said the claims about its structure lack merit and that the companies bringing the challenges are attempting to distract from their violations of federal labor law.
The 5th Circuit panel includes Circuit Judges Jerry Smith and Andrew Oldham, who were appointed by Republican presidents, and Circuit Judge Carl Stewart, an appointee of Democratic former President Bill Clinton.
The case is SpaceX v. NLRB, 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 24-40315.
For SpaceX: Catherine Eschbach, Harry Johnson and Michael Kenneally of Morgan Lewis & Bockius
For the NLRB: David Boehm
Read more:
SpaceX wins block on US labor board case over severance agreements
SpaceX seeks new Texas venue for challenge to NLRB after 5th Circuit ruling
SpaceX wins temporary block on NLRB case over fired engineers
SpaceX loses bid to keep challenge to NLRB structure in Texas court
NLRB defends 'zealous advocacy' of SpaceX case transfer
SpaceX faces hearing on engineers fired after criticizing Elon Musk over sexism
US judge blocks NLRB case against energy firm challenging agency's structure
US Supreme Court ruling curbing agency powers could hobble labor board
NLRB's Abruzzo hits back at 'low-road' companies challenging agency's structure
Reporting by Daniel Wiessner in Albany, New York
Actifs liés
Dernières actualités
Avertissement : Les entités de XM Group proposent à notre plateforme de trading en ligne un service d'exécution uniquement, autorisant une personne à consulter et/ou à utiliser le contenu disponible sur ou via le site internet, qui n'a pas pour but de modifier ou d'élargir cette situation. De tels accès et utilisation sont toujours soumis aux : (i) Conditions générales ; (ii) Avertissements sur les risques et (iii) Avertissement complet. Un tel contenu n'est par conséquent fourni que pour information générale. En particulier, sachez que les contenus de notre plateforme de trading en ligne ne sont ni une sollicitation ni une offre de participation à toute transaction sur les marchés financiers. Le trading sur les marchés financiers implique un niveau significatif de risques pour votre capital.
Tout le matériel publié dans notre Centre de trading en ligne est destiné à des fins de formation / d'information uniquement et ne contient pas – et ne doit pas être considéré comme contenant – des conseils et recommandations en matière de finance, de fiscalité des investissements ou de trading, ou un enregistrement de nos prix de trading ou une offre, une sollicitation, une transaction à propos de tout instrument financier ou bien des promotions financières non sollicitées à votre égard.
Tout contenu tiers, de même que le contenu préparé par XM, tels que les opinions, actualités, études, analyses, prix, autres informations ou liens vers des sites tiers contenus sur ce site internet sont fournis "tels quels", comme commentaires généraux sur le marché et ne constituent pas des conseils en investissement. Dans la mesure où tout contenu est considéré comme de la recherche en investissement, vous devez noter et accepter que le contenu n'a pas été conçu ni préparé conformément aux exigences légales visant à promouvoir l'indépendance de la recherche en investissement et, en tant que tel, il serait considéré comme une communication marketing selon les lois et réglementations applicables. Veuillez vous assurer que vous avez lu et compris notre Avis sur la recherche en investissement non indépendante et notre avertissement sur les risques concernant les informations susdites, qui peuvent consultés ici.
