Tesla faces sanctions bid in California wrongful death lawsuit
Adds comment from plaintiff's lawyer in paragraphs 6, 7
By Mike Scarcella
Oct 28 (Reuters) -The estate of a man who was killed in 2021 after his Tesla crashed and caught fire has asked a federal judge in San Francisco to sanction the electric vehicle maker over stalled efforts to settle a wrongful death lawsuit.
Lawyers for the estate of Charles Leach said in a court filing on Friday night that Tesla violated a court order by failing to send a company official with settlement authority to a mediation hearing last month.
The estate's lawyers said they reached a deal to resolve the wrongful death lawsuit for a confidential amount, but they learned hours into the September hearing that Tesla’s designee, a products liability lawyer, could not approve a settlement agreement on his own.
Tesla's actions caused the parties to breach the settlement agreement, the lawyers said. The estate asked the court to award $9,600 in legal fees as a sanction against the Elon Musk-owned carmarker.
Tesla and its attorneys did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
An attorney for the estate, Todd Walburg, on Monday said to his knowledge the settlement was no longer on the table after a deadline passed.
"This is a just case, and a grieving widow who lost her husband in a Tesla crash deserves some closure rather than having the rug pulled out from under her after a mediation," Walburg said.
Tesla has denied any wrongdoing in the case, blaming the driver for the fatal crash. A jury trial is scheduled for July 2025.
The estate's lawsuit said Leach’s Tesla Model Y “suddenly” accelerated, went off the road and slammed into a pillar at an Ohio gas station. Leach, 72, died from blunt force trauma, burns and other injuries.
“Tesla was aware that its vehicles — including the Model Y — have reportedly on hundreds of occasions accelerated suddenly and without explanation,” the lawsuit said.
Tesla has responded that Leach was solely to blame for “improper and unsafe” operation of his 2021 vehicle. The company said Leach’s model “was state-of-the-art and was not defective in design or manufacture.”
Tesla has faced other lawsuits over crashes blamed on alleged defects in its electric vehicles. Tesla last year won the first trial over claims that its Autopilot driver assistant feature led to a death.
Tesla separately faces U.S. legal and regulatory scrutiny over its driver assistance systems. In December, Tesla recalled millions of vehicles to install new safeguards.
The case is Donna Leach v Tesla, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, No. 3:23-cv-03378-SI.
For plaintiff: Todd Walburg and Scott Baez of McCune Law Group
For defendant: Sandra Ezell of Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough
Read more:
US probes Tesla's Full Self-Driving software in 2.4 mln cars after fatal crash
Exclusive - Tesla Autopilot probe, US prosecutors focus on securities, wire fraud
Tesla settles case over fatal Autopilot crash of Apple engineer
Elon Musk defeats bid to be questioned in Tesla fatal crash lawsuit
Reporting by Mike Scarcella
Actifs liés
Dernières actualités
Avertissement : Les entités de XM Group proposent à notre plateforme de trading en ligne un service d'exécution uniquement, autorisant une personne à consulter et/ou à utiliser le contenu disponible sur ou via le site internet, qui n'a pas pour but de modifier ou d'élargir cette situation. De tels accès et utilisation sont toujours soumis aux : (i) Conditions générales ; (ii) Avertissements sur les risques et (iii) Avertissement complet. Un tel contenu n'est par conséquent fourni que pour information générale. En particulier, sachez que les contenus de notre plateforme de trading en ligne ne sont ni une sollicitation ni une offre de participation à toute transaction sur les marchés financiers. Le trading sur les marchés financiers implique un niveau significatif de risques pour votre capital.
Tout le matériel publié dans notre Centre de trading en ligne est destiné à des fins de formation / d'information uniquement et ne contient pas – et ne doit pas être considéré comme contenant – des conseils et recommandations en matière de finance, de fiscalité des investissements ou de trading, ou un enregistrement de nos prix de trading ou une offre, une sollicitation, une transaction à propos de tout instrument financier ou bien des promotions financières non sollicitées à votre égard.
Tout contenu tiers, de même que le contenu préparé par XM, tels que les opinions, actualités, études, analyses, prix, autres informations ou liens vers des sites tiers contenus sur ce site internet sont fournis "tels quels", comme commentaires généraux sur le marché et ne constituent pas des conseils en investissement. Dans la mesure où tout contenu est considéré comme de la recherche en investissement, vous devez noter et accepter que le contenu n'a pas été conçu ni préparé conformément aux exigences légales visant à promouvoir l'indépendance de la recherche en investissement et, en tant que tel, il serait considéré comme une communication marketing selon les lois et réglementations applicables. Veuillez vous assurer que vous avez lu et compris notre Avis sur la recherche en investissement non indépendante et notre avertissement sur les risques concernant les informations susdites, qui peuvent consultés ici.
