XM n’offre pas ses services aux résidents des États-Unis d’Amérique.

NLRB issues first order requiring bargaining despite union election loss



<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head><title>NLRB issues first order requiring bargaining despite union election loss</title></head><body>

By Daniel Wiessner

June 18 (Reuters) -The National Labor Relations Board has ordered a Las Vegas casino operator to recognize and bargain with a union, in the first ruling of its kind by the agency since it created a path for unions to organize workers even after losing elections.

The board in a decision issued on Monday said NP Red Rock, which owns the Red Rock Casino and two others, had engaged in "egregious and pervasive unlawful conduct" that tainted a 2019 election and warranted a bargaining order even though workers voted 627-534 against joining a union.

It was the first time the five-member board applied its 2023 decision involving building supply company Cemex Construction Materials that resurrected key elements of a policy it eliminated more than 50 years ago requiring businesses that commit labor law violations to bargain with unions without holding formal elections, one of the most reviled board rulings among business groups and Republicans in recent years.

Red Rock illegally promised certain benefits if workers rejected the union and threatened to withhold them if the union won the election, the board said.

Two days before the election, the company gave out more than 500 free steaks branded with the words "Vote No," an apparent response to workers' complaints about the quality of food they were served at a buffet, according to the decision.

"[NP Red Rock's] extensive coercive and unlawful misconduct stemmed from a carefully crafted corporate strategy intentionally designed at every step to interfere with employees’ free choice," the board said.

Lawyers for NP Red Rock and Unite Here, the union that represents its workers, did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

For decades, unions had been required to petition for and win secret ballot elections before employers had to recognize and bargain with them.

The board in Cemex said that when a union provides evidence of majority support in a workplace, such as signed authorization cards, an employer must voluntarily recognize the union or file a petition for an election. If the employer commits severe unfair labor practices, which is common in union campaigns, it can be made to bargain without a vote ever being held or after a union loses.

In NP Red Rock's case, about 60% of the 1,300 workers in the bargaining unit had signed cards authorizing the union as their bargaining representative prior to the election.

Cemex has appealed the board's ruling to the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

The 1st Circuit in Boston is considering a cannabis company's appeal of a judge's decision that applied Cemex and required it to bargain with a union that lost an election at a retail store. The judge was ruling on the board's request for a temporary injunction pending the outcome of a related administrative case against the company.

The board and supporters of the Cemex standard have said the change was necessary to counter the prevalence of illegal union-busting tactics by many employers, and they say that nothing in federal labor law requires formal elections.

Critics of the ruling have said it deprives workers of free choice and conflicts with a 1974 U.S. Supreme Court ruling that said unions, and not employers, bear the burden of filing election petitions.

The case is NP Red Rock LLC, National Labor Relations Board, No. 28-CA-244484.

For Red Rock: David Dornak of Fisher Phillips

For the union: Eric Myers of McCracken Stemerman & Holsberry

For the NLRB general counsel: Sara Demirok and Kyler Scheid


Read more:

NLRB paves way for workers to unionize without formal elections

Unions poised to capitalize on U.S. labor board rulings that bolstered organizing

Cannabis company is first forced to bargain with union under new NLRB test

Cannabis company must bargain with union that lost election, US judge rules



Reporting by Daniel Wiessner in Albany, New York

</body></html>

Avertissement : Les entités de XM Group proposent à notre plateforme de trading en ligne un service d'exécution uniquement, autorisant une personne à consulter et/ou à utiliser le contenu disponible sur ou via le site internet, qui n'a pas pour but de modifier ou d'élargir cette situation. De tels accès et utilisation sont toujours soumis aux : (i) Conditions générales ; (ii) Avertissements sur les risques et (iii) Avertissement complet. Un tel contenu n'est par conséquent fourni que pour information générale. En particulier, sachez que les contenus de notre plateforme de trading en ligne ne sont ni une sollicitation ni une offre de participation à toute transaction sur les marchés financiers. Le trading sur les marchés financiers implique un niveau significatif de risques pour votre capital.

Tout le matériel publié dans notre Centre de trading en ligne est destiné à des fins de formation / d'information uniquement et ne contient pas – et ne doit pas être considéré comme contenant – des conseils et recommandations en matière de finance, de fiscalité des investissements ou de trading, ou un enregistrement de nos prix de trading ou une offre, une sollicitation, une transaction à propos de tout instrument financier ou bien des promotions financières non sollicitées à votre égard.

Tout contenu tiers, de même que le contenu préparé par XM, tels que les opinions, actualités, études, analyses, prix, autres informations ou liens vers des sites tiers contenus sur ce site internet sont fournis "tels quels", comme commentaires généraux sur le marché et ne constituent pas des conseils en investissement. Dans la mesure où tout contenu est considéré comme de la recherche en investissement, vous devez noter et accepter que le contenu n'a pas été conçu ni préparé conformément aux exigences légales visant à promouvoir l'indépendance de la recherche en investissement et, en tant que tel, il serait considéré comme une communication marketing selon les lois et réglementations applicables. Veuillez vous assurer que vous avez lu et compris notre Avis sur la recherche en investissement non indépendante et notre avertissement sur les risques concernant les informations susdites, qui peuvent consultés ici.

Avertissement sur les risques : votre capital est à risque. Les produits à effet de levier ne sont pas recommandés pour tous. Veuillez consulter notre Divulgation des risques