New Pharma will crowd out Big Pharma
The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are her own.
By Aimee Donnellan
LONDON, June 11 (Reuters Breakingviews) -Big Pharma is under threat from tech-driven upstart rivals. The values of large, established players like $159 billion Pfizer PFE.N, $230 billion Novartis NOVN.S and $216 billion Roche ROG.S are converging with newer players like $121 billion Vertex Pharmaceuticals VRTX.O. As drugmakers wrestle with the need to constantly replenish their stocks of remedies via deals, big names may struggle to remain relevant.
Big Pharma companies have taken over a century to become market leaders. Swiss giant Roche was founded in 1896, while U.S. drugmaker Pfizer has been around since 1849, when typhoid and scarlet fever were among the biggest killers. Both giants came to dominate the industry by making savvy calls on common diseases, like cancer and infectious ailments. M&A is also a critical part of their growth story – witness Roche’s $47 billion takeover of Genentech in 2009, and Pfizer’s $43 billion purchase of cancer specialist Seagen in 2023.
But now a new breed of tech-savvy drugmakers, once the obvious prey of their established rivals, are threatening their dominance. Over the past five years, Amgen AMGN.O, Regeneron REGN.O, Genmab GMAB.CO and Vertex have added $270 billion to their combined market values. That compares to Big Pharma firms like Pfizer, Novartis, GSK GSK.L, Sanofi SASY.PA and Roche, whose aggregate market value has declined by nearly $80 billion in the same period.
The growth of the once bite-sized drugmakers is already creating a hotter climate for takeovers. Last year, the value of biopharma M&A increased by 79% to $152 billion. In 2022, $164 billion Amgen, which is now roughly the same size as Pfizer after increasing fivefold since 2010, splurged $28 billion on Horizon Therapeutics. Analysts reckon Horizon had been on a list of deal targets for more established players for some time.
This increased competition comes at a particularly inopportune moment for executives from traditional drugmakers like Pfizer, Merck MRK.N and GSK, all of which will gradually lose patent exclusivity on some of their top-selling drugs. Merck’s patent on its cancer drug Keytruda, which delivered over $25 billion in sales in 2023, expires in four years. The United States’ Inflation Reduction Act also gives biologic drugs, which are created by using living cells and were historically made by smaller technology-driven drugmakers, longer patents than more established drugs like insulin and antihistamines. That puts an even greater value on the companies that make those newer products.
Deals are often the quickest way of replenishing a drug cupboard. But if there is increased competition, the price of smaller drugmakers will spike. AbbVie’s ABBV.N $10 billion purchase of ImmunoGen earlier this year included an eye-watering 95% premium, suggesting the trend is already in full swing. There are also fewer obvious targets to choose from. In 2022 new drug approvals in the U.S. were down by a quarter, to the lowest level since 2016. Eventually, today’s Big Pharma and their biotech challengers may swap places.
Follow @aimeedonnellan on X
Graphic: Tech-driven drugmakers’ market values are closing in on Big Pharma https://reut.rs/3x2Hy3x
Editing by George Hay and Oliver Taslic
Actifs liés
Dernières actualités
Avertissement : Les entités de XM Group proposent à notre plateforme de trading en ligne un service d'exécution uniquement, autorisant une personne à consulter et/ou à utiliser le contenu disponible sur ou via le site internet, qui n'a pas pour but de modifier ou d'élargir cette situation. De tels accès et utilisation sont toujours soumis aux : (i) Conditions générales ; (ii) Avertissements sur les risques et (iii) Avertissement complet. Un tel contenu n'est par conséquent fourni que pour information générale. En particulier, sachez que les contenus de notre plateforme de trading en ligne ne sont ni une sollicitation ni une offre de participation à toute transaction sur les marchés financiers. Le trading sur les marchés financiers implique un niveau significatif de risques pour votre capital.
Tout le matériel publié dans notre Centre de trading en ligne est destiné à des fins de formation / d'information uniquement et ne contient pas – et ne doit pas être considéré comme contenant – des conseils et recommandations en matière de finance, de fiscalité des investissements ou de trading, ou un enregistrement de nos prix de trading ou une offre, une sollicitation, une transaction à propos de tout instrument financier ou bien des promotions financières non sollicitées à votre égard.
Tout contenu tiers, de même que le contenu préparé par XM, tels que les opinions, actualités, études, analyses, prix, autres informations ou liens vers des sites tiers contenus sur ce site internet sont fournis "tels quels", comme commentaires généraux sur le marché et ne constituent pas des conseils en investissement. Dans la mesure où tout contenu est considéré comme de la recherche en investissement, vous devez noter et accepter que le contenu n'a pas été conçu ni préparé conformément aux exigences légales visant à promouvoir l'indépendance de la recherche en investissement et, en tant que tel, il serait considéré comme une communication marketing selon les lois et réglementations applicables. Veuillez vous assurer que vous avez lu et compris notre Avis sur la recherche en investissement non indépendante et notre avertissement sur les risques concernant les informations susdites, qui peuvent consultés ici.
