McKinsey wins dismissal of Jay Alix's lawsuit over bankruptcy conflicts
Recasts; expands comment from Jay Alix's lawyer; adds McKinsey comment, details from decision, discussion of federal anti-racketeering law
Judge says Jay Alix lacked standing to sue under RICO
Alix says McKinsey hid tie to lenders, clients' rivals
McKinsey denies accusations, calls them meritless
By Jonathan Stempel
NEW YORK, July 3 (Reuters) -A U.S. judge dismissed turnaround specialist Jay Alix's lawsuit accusing consulting giant McKinsey & Co of misleading bankruptcy courts about conflicts of interest when seeking permission to perform lucrative work on corporate restructurings.
U.S. District Judge Jesse Furman in Manhattan said Alix lacked standing to sue under the federal Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act ("RICO") because AlixPartners, the consulting firm he founded and partially owns, never assigned him that right.
"Alix has no one to blame but himself - or perhaps AlixPartners," Furman wrote in a 34-page decision on Wednesday.
The decision follows six years of often bitter litigation between Alix and one of his most powerful rivals, including a successful appeal by Alix in 2022 of an earlier dismissal.
"We're disappointed in Judge Furman's decision, and respectfully disagree with it," Jay Alix's lawyer, Sean O'Shea, said. "This is a nonsubstantive ruling on the case, and we fully expect the (appeals court) to see our way again."
'CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE' ALLEGED
Alix accused McKinsey of running a "criminal enterprise" by hiding its ties to lenders and competitors of its clients.
He said these conflicts should have disqualified McKinsey from 13 bankruptcies including American Airlines AAL.O, food retailer Harry & David and coal producer Alpha Natural Resources, and potentially cost AlixPartners some assignments.
Alix also accused McKinsey of running a "pay-to-play" scheme in which McKinsey would arrange meetings between its consulting clients and bankruptcy lawyers, if those lawyers would refer their bankruptcy clients to McKinsey for restructuring work.
RICO lets people sue if they believe criminal enterprises caused them harm. Alix had sought triple damages.
McKinsey said in a statement: "We have said for years that Jay Alix's accusations are entirely meritless and we are glad the case has once again been dismissed."
AlixPartners was not a party to the case. The New York-based firm and its lawyers did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
'NO MERE TECHNICALITY'
Alix's assignment let him pursue claims against McKinsey over "illegal competitive activity in the crisis management and consulting business involving major bankruptcy cases."
But the judge said "illegal competitive activity" refers naturally to antitrust claims, and said the assignment did not mention RICO or terms such as racketeering and organized crime.
Furman said it was unclear whether the drafting was simply careless, or whether Alix and AlixPartners "tried to play fast and loose" by shielding AlixPartners from the burdens of litigation while preserving its ability to sue later.
The result "may smack of a technicality - especially in light of the lengthy history of this litigation," the judge wrote. "But it is no mere technicality."
Furman said the assignment did not surface in the litigation until January of this year, which explains why he did not rule on its validity sooner.
Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York
Editing by Matthew Lewis
Actifs liés
Dernières actualités
Avertissement : Les entités de XM Group proposent à notre plateforme de trading en ligne un service d'exécution uniquement, autorisant une personne à consulter et/ou à utiliser le contenu disponible sur ou via le site internet, qui n'a pas pour but de modifier ou d'élargir cette situation. De tels accès et utilisation sont toujours soumis aux : (i) Conditions générales ; (ii) Avertissements sur les risques et (iii) Avertissement complet. Un tel contenu n'est par conséquent fourni que pour information générale. En particulier, sachez que les contenus de notre plateforme de trading en ligne ne sont ni une sollicitation ni une offre de participation à toute transaction sur les marchés financiers. Le trading sur les marchés financiers implique un niveau significatif de risques pour votre capital.
Tout le matériel publié dans notre Centre de trading en ligne est destiné à des fins de formation / d'information uniquement et ne contient pas – et ne doit pas être considéré comme contenant – des conseils et recommandations en matière de finance, de fiscalité des investissements ou de trading, ou un enregistrement de nos prix de trading ou une offre, une sollicitation, une transaction à propos de tout instrument financier ou bien des promotions financières non sollicitées à votre égard.
Tout contenu tiers, de même que le contenu préparé par XM, tels que les opinions, actualités, études, analyses, prix, autres informations ou liens vers des sites tiers contenus sur ce site internet sont fournis "tels quels", comme commentaires généraux sur le marché et ne constituent pas des conseils en investissement. Dans la mesure où tout contenu est considéré comme de la recherche en investissement, vous devez noter et accepter que le contenu n'a pas été conçu ni préparé conformément aux exigences légales visant à promouvoir l'indépendance de la recherche en investissement et, en tant que tel, il serait considéré comme une communication marketing selon les lois et réglementations applicables. Veuillez vous assurer que vous avez lu et compris notre Avis sur la recherche en investissement non indépendante et notre avertissement sur les risques concernant les informations susdites, qui peuvent consultés ici.
