Lawyer who tipped SEC can't claim whistleblower award, US appeals court rules
By Mike Scarcella
Aug 16 (Reuters) -A corporate attorney who tipped off the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to possible fraud involving his company was properly denied eligibility to collect a whistleblower award, an appeals court said in a ruling unsealed on Friday.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit said the attorney, who was not named, failed to meet SEC requirements for whistleblower information to be "original" and not derived from legal representation of a client.
There is a limited exception to the requirements under which lawyers could claim an SEC award if their disclosure was made in accordance with state professional attorney conduct rules and in a client's interest. The D.C. Circuit found the exception did not apply.
The three-judge panel upheld a commission order denying a cut of the unspecified award.
In a statement, attorneys for the unnamed lawyer said their client “did the right thing in blowing the whistle” and said he “put a stop to a massive securities fraud.”
The SEC declined to comment.
Much of the litigation was conducted under seal, shielding the names of the attorney and his company.
The D.C. Circuit said the underlying tip was related to a 2018 enforcement action in Florida against two individuals, the lawyer’s company and other entities. Sanctions levied by the SEC in the case totaled tens of millions of dollars.
Whistleblower awards for attorneys are available only in limited circumstances, the SEC told the appeals court.
The lawyer argued that he acted in his company's interest and provided information to the SEC to prevent it from committing a crime.
The D.C. Circuit disagreed.
“In reporting on the suspected wrongdoing, then, Doe was reporting on his own client,” the court said. “Common sense therefore dictates that Doe could not have reasonably believed that he was acting in his client’s best interest.”
The SEC’s whistleblower program as of last year had doled out nearly $2 billion in awards to about 400 whistleblowers since its creation in 2010, according to the agency.
The largest awards have been worth hundreds of millions of dollars.
The case is John Doe v. Securities and Exchange Commission, U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, No. 23-1044.
For Doe: Tom Cummins and Max Maccoby of Washington Global Law Group
For SEC: William Shirey of SEC
Read more:
Comcast sues US Labor Department to shut down whistleblower case, citing US Supreme Court
US Justice Dept. launches whistleblower program aimed at corporate crime
Why foreign workers are not shielded by federal whistleblower laws
Wall Street criminal enforcer urges whistleblowers to come forward
Reporting by Mike Scarcella
Actifs liés
Dernières actualités
Avertissement : Les entités de XM Group proposent à notre plateforme de trading en ligne un service d'exécution uniquement, autorisant une personne à consulter et/ou à utiliser le contenu disponible sur ou via le site internet, qui n'a pas pour but de modifier ou d'élargir cette situation. De tels accès et utilisation sont toujours soumis aux : (i) Conditions générales ; (ii) Avertissements sur les risques et (iii) Avertissement complet. Un tel contenu n'est par conséquent fourni que pour information générale. En particulier, sachez que les contenus de notre plateforme de trading en ligne ne sont ni une sollicitation ni une offre de participation à toute transaction sur les marchés financiers. Le trading sur les marchés financiers implique un niveau significatif de risques pour votre capital.
Tout le matériel publié dans notre Centre de trading en ligne est destiné à des fins de formation / d'information uniquement et ne contient pas – et ne doit pas être considéré comme contenant – des conseils et recommandations en matière de finance, de fiscalité des investissements ou de trading, ou un enregistrement de nos prix de trading ou une offre, une sollicitation, une transaction à propos de tout instrument financier ou bien des promotions financières non sollicitées à votre égard.
Tout contenu tiers, de même que le contenu préparé par XM, tels que les opinions, actualités, études, analyses, prix, autres informations ou liens vers des sites tiers contenus sur ce site internet sont fournis "tels quels", comme commentaires généraux sur le marché et ne constituent pas des conseils en investissement. Dans la mesure où tout contenu est considéré comme de la recherche en investissement, vous devez noter et accepter que le contenu n'a pas été conçu ni préparé conformément aux exigences légales visant à promouvoir l'indépendance de la recherche en investissement et, en tant que tel, il serait considéré comme une communication marketing selon les lois et réglementations applicables. Veuillez vous assurer que vous avez lu et compris notre Avis sur la recherche en investissement non indépendante et notre avertissement sur les risques concernant les informations susdites, qui peuvent consultés ici.
