XM n’offre pas ses services aux résidents des États-Unis d’Amérique.

J&J's proposed talc settlement sparks lawsuit between plaintiffs' firms



<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head><title>J&J's proposed talc settlement sparks lawsuit between plaintiffs' firms</title></head><body>

By Dietrich Knauth

Sept 11 (Reuters) -Johnson & Johnson's latest effort to end tens of thousands of talc lawsuits has sparked a new legal battle between plaintiffs' law firms, with one firm accusing its former partner of selling out to the healthcare behemoth to cover its own debts.

Beasley, Allen, Crow, Methvin, Portis & Miles, which is leading the opposition to J&J's settlement strategy, filed a lawsuit Tuesday in Alabama federal court accusing The Smith Law Firm of breaking a joint venture agreement to represent 11,000 people who have alleged that J&J's Baby Powder and other talc products caused their cancer.

J&J, which denies the claims and says that its talc is safe, has announced plans to finalize a multibillion-dollar settlement of the lawsuits through the bankruptcy of a subsidiary company. It recently announced a new deal with the Smith Law Firm, which the company described as a leading holdout to the settlement.

J&J had previously committed to paying $8 billion over 25 years, and two sources familiar with the new agreement said that the company had kicked in approximately $1.1 billion more to win support from Smith's clients.

In its Tuesday lawsuit, Beasley Allen said that Smith, the sole member of the Smith Law Firm, reneged on a joint venture agreement in order to get a faster payment from J&J and escape from debts he owes to litigation funders.

Smith and Beasley Allen did not immediately respond to requests for comment. J&J declined to comment on the lawsuit or settlement talks.

Smith has sought to persuade the firms’ mutual clients to vote in favor of J&J’s proposed bankruptcy settlement, according to the lawsuit. J&J initially had set a July 26 voting deadline for the deal, but it extended that timeline to allow Smith to drum up more support.

J&J is preparing to have a subsidiary declare bankruptcy for a third time by the end of this month to finalize the proposed settlement, according to people familiar with the matter. Courts have rebuffed J&J's two previous efforts to end the talc lawsuits through a subsidiary's bankruptcy.

Beasley Allen has opposed the latest settlement proposal, saying that it abuses U.S. bankruptcy law and does not pay enough to compensate people who have developed cancer.

Smith’s efforts to drum up votes for J&J’s settlement violate the joint venture agreement, which provided that Beasley Allen would “be responsible for all client contact,” the lawsuit alleged.

Beasley Allen said that Smith, an attorney who won the first talc trial against J&J in 2013, sought to partner with Beasley Allen and Porter Malouf in order to bring more cases against J&J. The agreement requires Beasley Allen to shoulder 50% of the workload and costs of litigation, with Smith and Porter Malouf taking care of the other half.

But Smith failed to live up to his end of the bargain, and found himself deep in debt to litigation funders after buying out Porter Malouf's responsibilities without telling Beasley Allen, according to the lawsuit. Smith also secretly kept some talc clients for himself, instead of bringing them to the joint venture, according to Beasley Allen.

Beasley Allen also named Porter Malouf as a defendant in its lawsuit, saying it failed to live up to responsibilities under the joint venture agreement.

Porter Malouf did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

J&J has alleged that Smith Law Firm owes as much $240 million to its funders, according to Beasley Allen’s complaint.

Beasley Allen said that Smith also owes $1.1 million for litigation expenses fronted by Beasley Allen in the joint venture.

The case is Beasley Allen v. The Smith Law Firm et al, U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Alabama, No. 24-cv-00582

For Beasley Allen: Robert Segall and David Martin of Copeland, Franco, Screws & Gill

For The Smith firm: Not yet available


Read more:

Johnson & Johnson adds $1.1 billion to proposed talc settlement

The battle over J&J’s bankruptcy plan to end talc lawsuits

With J&J pushing a 3rd talc bankruptcy, court affirms earlier loss



</body></html>

Avertissement : Les entités de XM Group proposent à notre plateforme de trading en ligne un service d'exécution uniquement, autorisant une personne à consulter et/ou à utiliser le contenu disponible sur ou via le site internet, qui n'a pas pour but de modifier ou d'élargir cette situation. De tels accès et utilisation sont toujours soumis aux : (i) Conditions générales ; (ii) Avertissements sur les risques et (iii) Avertissement complet. Un tel contenu n'est par conséquent fourni que pour information générale. En particulier, sachez que les contenus de notre plateforme de trading en ligne ne sont ni une sollicitation ni une offre de participation à toute transaction sur les marchés financiers. Le trading sur les marchés financiers implique un niveau significatif de risques pour votre capital.

Tout le matériel publié dans notre Centre de trading en ligne est destiné à des fins de formation / d'information uniquement et ne contient pas – et ne doit pas être considéré comme contenant – des conseils et recommandations en matière de finance, de fiscalité des investissements ou de trading, ou un enregistrement de nos prix de trading ou une offre, une sollicitation, une transaction à propos de tout instrument financier ou bien des promotions financières non sollicitées à votre égard.

Tout contenu tiers, de même que le contenu préparé par XM, tels que les opinions, actualités, études, analyses, prix, autres informations ou liens vers des sites tiers contenus sur ce site internet sont fournis "tels quels", comme commentaires généraux sur le marché et ne constituent pas des conseils en investissement. Dans la mesure où tout contenu est considéré comme de la recherche en investissement, vous devez noter et accepter que le contenu n'a pas été conçu ni préparé conformément aux exigences légales visant à promouvoir l'indépendance de la recherche en investissement et, en tant que tel, il serait considéré comme une communication marketing selon les lois et réglementations applicables. Veuillez vous assurer que vous avez lu et compris notre Avis sur la recherche en investissement non indépendante et notre avertissement sur les risques concernant les informations susdites, qui peuvent consultés ici.

Avertissement sur les risques : votre capital est à risque. Les produits à effet de levier ne sont pas recommandés pour tous. Veuillez consulter notre Divulgation des risques