Green hydrogen fever gets needed doses of reality
The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are his own. Refiles to fix advisory formatting.
By Antony Currie
MELBOURNE, Aug 1 (Reuters Breakingviews) -Hot air is seeping out of the green hydrogen bubble. Over the past five years fans of the low-carbon gas have argued it can replace fossil fuel in everything from industrial processes to heating homes to transport. Yet cost and science make many of its applications fanciful. Developments in July at two big proponents of the technology suggest the industry may be about to get more practical and smaller.
European Union auditors, for instance, have called the bloc's target of producing 10 million tons of green hydrogen and importing as much again by 2030 as "overly optimistic" and lacking "robust analyses". Fortescue FMG.AX, meanwhile, has just ditched its goal of producing 15 million tons a year by 2030. Andrew Forrest, the $38 billion Australian iron ore miner's founder and a climate campaigner, has been one of the gas' most vocal backers, calling sceptics "muppets".
Forrest blames high energy costs for the pullback from the gas extracted from water using renewable energy. That's just one of many factors though. The scale of power needed is daunting: using green hydrogen in all steelmaking, aviation and shipping would require almost five times the solar and wind capacity installed globally in 2022, says Michael Liebreich, co-managing partner at EcoPragma Capital. The storage and shipping capacity required is also higher than for the conventional hydrogen made from fossil fuels.
All in, producing green hydrogen, for most companies, would currently cost at least $6 a kilogramme, four times the expense of producing the dirtier version of the gas, per Liebreich. He notes, using International Energy Agency data, that just 1% of some 1600 green hydrogen projects by production volume have progressed much beyond the exploratory stage.
And as a fuel it is incredibly wasteful. At least 70% of the energy is lost to making and moving it by the time it lands in, say, a hydrogen-powered car, like the 500 Mirai models Toyota Motor 7203.T supplied to the Paris Olympics; for pure electric vehicles, the loss is just 20%, according to White House climate adviser Saul Griffith.
The concept still has some clear uses. It could replace the natural, or fossil, gas that currently creates around 100 million tons a year of hydrogen for manufacturing fertiliser, petrochemicals and other products. It could replace coal in at least some steelmaking, which is where Forrest is now focusing Fortescue's efforts. And it could play a small role in other applications, say as emergency long-term backup in some electricity grids.
But electric batteries, heatpumps and biogas are usually better alternatives to green hydrogen for power, heating and transport - from cars to jet fuel. Trying to compete with them will just burn money.
Follow @AntonyMCurrie on X
CONTEXT NEWS
Fortescue Energy CEO Mark Hutchinson on July 25 said the company is "steadfast in its commitment to green hydgrogen".
He was speaking to investors and analysts a week after parent company Fortescue said it was putting on hold its target of producing 15 million tons of green hydrogen by 2030.
On July 17 the European Court of Auditors published a report saying that the European Union is unlikely to meet its "overly ambitious" goals of producing 10 million tons of green hydrogen and importing a further 10 million tons by 2030.
Editing by Una Galani and Katrina Hamlin
Actifs liés
Dernières actualités
Avertissement : Les entités de XM Group proposent à notre plateforme de trading en ligne un service d'exécution uniquement, autorisant une personne à consulter et/ou à utiliser le contenu disponible sur ou via le site internet, qui n'a pas pour but de modifier ou d'élargir cette situation. De tels accès et utilisation sont toujours soumis aux : (i) Conditions générales ; (ii) Avertissements sur les risques et (iii) Avertissement complet. Un tel contenu n'est par conséquent fourni que pour information générale. En particulier, sachez que les contenus de notre plateforme de trading en ligne ne sont ni une sollicitation ni une offre de participation à toute transaction sur les marchés financiers. Le trading sur les marchés financiers implique un niveau significatif de risques pour votre capital.
Tout le matériel publié dans notre Centre de trading en ligne est destiné à des fins de formation / d'information uniquement et ne contient pas – et ne doit pas être considéré comme contenant – des conseils et recommandations en matière de finance, de fiscalité des investissements ou de trading, ou un enregistrement de nos prix de trading ou une offre, une sollicitation, une transaction à propos de tout instrument financier ou bien des promotions financières non sollicitées à votre égard.
Tout contenu tiers, de même que le contenu préparé par XM, tels que les opinions, actualités, études, analyses, prix, autres informations ou liens vers des sites tiers contenus sur ce site internet sont fournis "tels quels", comme commentaires généraux sur le marché et ne constituent pas des conseils en investissement. Dans la mesure où tout contenu est considéré comme de la recherche en investissement, vous devez noter et accepter que le contenu n'a pas été conçu ni préparé conformément aux exigences légales visant à promouvoir l'indépendance de la recherche en investissement et, en tant que tel, il serait considéré comme une communication marketing selon les lois et réglementations applicables. Veuillez vous assurer que vous avez lu et compris notre Avis sur la recherche en investissement non indépendante et notre avertissement sur les risques concernant les informations susdites, qui peuvent consultés ici.
