Ex-bankruptcy judge David Jones defeats bid for his phone records in tangled fee dispute
By Dietrich Knauth
Aug 7 (Reuters) -Former U.S. bankruptcy judge David Jones will not have his government cell phone records probed in a battle over attorneys' fees that he approved for his romantic partner's former law firm, a judge ruled Wednesday.
Jones resigned from the bench in October 2023 after admitting to a long-term, undisclosed relationship with bankruptcy attorney Liz Freeman, who was a partner at the law firm Jackson Walker, which regularly filed cases in Jones' court.
The U.S. Department of Justice's bankruptcy watchdog, the office of the U.S. Trustee, has argued that Jackson Walker should disgorge millions of dollars in legal fees that Jones approved in 33 bankruptcy cases filed by Jackson Walker.
As part of the fee dispute, an administrator charged with wrapping up J.C. Penney Co's 2020 bankruptcy had sought to subpoena a comprehensive record of calls and texts from Jones' government-issued cell phone, seeking to investigate a "rumor" that Jones improperly exchanged text messages with lawyers while he was presiding over the case.
But U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Eduardo Rodriguez ruled at a Wednesday court hearing in Houston that the proposed subpoena was not properly targeted to the current fee dispute or the administrator's concern that Jones' conduct had a negative impact on J.C. Penney's bankruptcy.
"This is too broad of a request," Rodriguez said.
The subpoena could reveal every phone number that Jones had contact with while he was on the bench, including the non-public phone numbers of other judges or court staff, Rodriguez said.
Attorneys for Jones and a spokesman for Jackson did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Rodriguez said that the J.C. Penney administrator could return with a scaled-down demand for records related to specific phone numbers, after it investigates the rumor further from other sources.
Rodriguez also discussed a recent meeting between Jones and Jackson Walker, for which Rodriguez had threatened sanctions.
That portion of the hearing was not made public due to Rodriguez's concern about a judicial policy that prevents judges from testifying about their official acts.
Rodriguez said in a Saturday court order that Jones and Jackson Walker may have violated that policy, and his previous court orders, by meeting informally while Rodriguez was still deciding what topics Jones could discuss in depositions with Jackson Walker and the U.S. Trustee.
Rodriguez said he will quickly review Wednesday's discussion to determine what portions of the hearing can be publicly disclosed by transcript or audio recording.
"I'm pretty confident most of it should be unsealed," Rodrigez said after the closed portion of the hearing concluded.
The case is In Re: Professional Fee Matters Concerning the Jackson Walker Law Firm, U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas, No. 23-00645.
For Jones: Ben Finestone and Joanna Caytas of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan
For Jackson Walker: Jason Boland of Norton Rose Fulbright
For the J.C. Penney plan administrator: Stephen Lemmon of Streusand, Landon, Ozburn & Lemmon
Read more:
Top US bankruptcy judge resigns amid ethics inquiry
Law firm says Texas judge wanted 'untruthful' statement about lawyer romance
Ex-bankruptcy judge plays defense on pre-deposition talks, phone records
Reporting by Dietrich Knauth in New York
Actifs liés
Dernières actualités
Avertissement : Les entités de XM Group proposent à notre plateforme de trading en ligne un service d'exécution uniquement, autorisant une personne à consulter et/ou à utiliser le contenu disponible sur ou via le site internet, qui n'a pas pour but de modifier ou d'élargir cette situation. De tels accès et utilisation sont toujours soumis aux : (i) Conditions générales ; (ii) Avertissements sur les risques et (iii) Avertissement complet. Un tel contenu n'est par conséquent fourni que pour information générale. En particulier, sachez que les contenus de notre plateforme de trading en ligne ne sont ni une sollicitation ni une offre de participation à toute transaction sur les marchés financiers. Le trading sur les marchés financiers implique un niveau significatif de risques pour votre capital.
Tout le matériel publié dans notre Centre de trading en ligne est destiné à des fins de formation / d'information uniquement et ne contient pas – et ne doit pas être considéré comme contenant – des conseils et recommandations en matière de finance, de fiscalité des investissements ou de trading, ou un enregistrement de nos prix de trading ou une offre, une sollicitation, une transaction à propos de tout instrument financier ou bien des promotions financières non sollicitées à votre égard.
Tout contenu tiers, de même que le contenu préparé par XM, tels que les opinions, actualités, études, analyses, prix, autres informations ou liens vers des sites tiers contenus sur ce site internet sont fournis "tels quels", comme commentaires généraux sur le marché et ne constituent pas des conseils en investissement. Dans la mesure où tout contenu est considéré comme de la recherche en investissement, vous devez noter et accepter que le contenu n'a pas été conçu ni préparé conformément aux exigences légales visant à promouvoir l'indépendance de la recherche en investissement et, en tant que tel, il serait considéré comme une communication marketing selon les lois et réglementations applicables. Veuillez vous assurer que vous avez lu et compris notre Avis sur la recherche en investissement non indépendante et notre avertissement sur les risques concernant les informations susdites, qui peuvent consultés ici.
