Cannabis company must bargain with union that lost election, US judge rules
Adds comment from the UFCW's lawyer in paragraphs 9-10
By Daniel Wiessner
May 14 (Reuters) -A federal judge in Boston on Tuesday ordered a cannabis dispensary operator to bargain with a union even though its workers voted against unionizing, in the first court ruling to apply a National Labor Relations Board decision creating a new path for unions to organize workers.
U.S. District Judge Myong Joun rejected claims by I.N.S.A. that a major 2023 NLRB ruling involving building materials company Cemex will likely be overturned by federal appeals courts and should not be applied to its case, saying he would not engage in "mere fortune-telling."
Joun granted the NLRB's request for a temporary injunction requiring I.N.S.A. to bargain with United Food and Commercial Workers (UFCW) and re-hire two union supporters at a Salem, Massachusetts store, who had been fired in the weeks before a 2022 election, pending the outcome of an underlying board case.
The store's staff voted 17-11 against joining the union. But Joun agreed with the board's general counsel that I.N.S.A. violated workers' rights, including by firing the pro-union employees, and tainted the election.
The Cemex decision says employers can be forced to bargain with unions if they engage in illegal labor practices during an organizing campaign, even when a union loses an election or one is never held, because that conduct can improperly discourage workers from unionizing.
Lawyers for I.N.S.A., which has denied wrongdoing, did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
NLRB General Counsel Jennifer Abruzzo in a statement said Joun correctly determined that the company's conduct had a coercive effect on workers' rights to a fair election.
"We are pleased that the district court decision provides the critical interim relief that employees need to exercise their rights under the National Labor Relations Act," Abruzzo said.
Alex Robertson, a lawyer for UFCW, said the union was pleased with the ruling.
"As we argued in our brief, questions regarding the Board’s interpretation of the Act should be decided in the ordinary course of Board administrative litigation," he said.
An NLRB regional director sued the company last year seeking a court injunction pending a ruling in the underlying board case accusing I.N.S.A. of unlawful labor practices.
An administrative judge in September in the first ruling to apply Cemex ordered I.N.S.A. to bargain with the union. The five-member board, whose decisions can be appealed to federal appeals courts, is reviewing the judge's decision.
The Cemex ruling was seen as a major boon to organized labor, establishing a blueprint for unionizing outside of the formal election process that has been in place for decades. Cemex has appealed the decision to the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.
The case is Sacks v. I.N.S.A. Inc, U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts, No. 23-12368.
For the NLRB: Daniel Fein and Miriam Hasbun
For I.N.S.A.: Allison Anderson and Jonathan Keselenko of Foley Hoag
For the union: Alfred Gordon O'Connell and Alex Robertson of Pyle Rome Ehrenberg
Read more:
Cannabis company is first forced to bargain with union under new NLRB test
NLRB paves way for workers to unionize without formal elections
Unions poised to capitalize on U.S. labor board rulings that bolstered organizing
Reporting by Daniel Wiessner in Albany, New York
Actifs liés
Dernières actualités
Avertissement : Les entités de XM Group proposent à notre plateforme de trading en ligne un service d'exécution uniquement, autorisant une personne à consulter et/ou à utiliser le contenu disponible sur ou via le site internet, qui n'a pas pour but de modifier ou d'élargir cette situation. De tels accès et utilisation sont toujours soumis aux : (i) Conditions générales ; (ii) Avertissements sur les risques et (iii) Avertissement complet. Un tel contenu n'est par conséquent fourni que pour information générale. En particulier, sachez que les contenus de notre plateforme de trading en ligne ne sont ni une sollicitation ni une offre de participation à toute transaction sur les marchés financiers. Le trading sur les marchés financiers implique un niveau significatif de risques pour votre capital.
Tout le matériel publié dans notre Centre de trading en ligne est destiné à des fins de formation / d'information uniquement et ne contient pas – et ne doit pas être considéré comme contenant – des conseils et recommandations en matière de finance, de fiscalité des investissements ou de trading, ou un enregistrement de nos prix de trading ou une offre, une sollicitation, une transaction à propos de tout instrument financier ou bien des promotions financières non sollicitées à votre égard.
Tout contenu tiers, de même que le contenu préparé par XM, tels que les opinions, actualités, études, analyses, prix, autres informations ou liens vers des sites tiers contenus sur ce site internet sont fournis "tels quels", comme commentaires généraux sur le marché et ne constituent pas des conseils en investissement. Dans la mesure où tout contenu est considéré comme de la recherche en investissement, vous devez noter et accepter que le contenu n'a pas été conçu ni préparé conformément aux exigences légales visant à promouvoir l'indépendance de la recherche en investissement et, en tant que tel, il serait considéré comme une communication marketing selon les lois et réglementations applicables. Veuillez vous assurer que vous avez lu et compris notre Avis sur la recherche en investissement non indépendante et notre avertissement sur les risques concernant les informations susdites, qui peuvent consultés ici.
