Activist investors mount record number of campaigns but win fewer board seats
By Svea Herbst-Bayliss
NEW YORK, July 1 (Reuters) -Activist investors mounted campaigns at a record number of companies globally during the first six months of 2024 but have been less successful in breaking into boardrooms as companies fought back effectively, data from Barclays shows.
Recent notable examples include Elliott Investment Management's targeting of Southwest Airlines LUV.N, while Starboard Value is taking on design software maker Autodesk ADSK.O and Jana Partners is pushing for changes at silicon carbide maker Wolfspeed WOLF.N.
The surge in activity may lead to more costly battles between activist shareholders and management over leadership changes, spin-offs and outright sales in the coming months, bankers, lawyers and investors said.
But uncertainty surrounding when interest rate cuts might come, geopolitical turmoil and a looming U.S. presidential election that could spell big changes in regulatory regimes, could also make corporate fights tougher.
"We are seeing more activity but fewer transactions and that means activist investors may have to dig in and stay around for longer," said Jim Rossman, global head of shareholder advisory at Barclays.
In the first half of the year, Barclays tracked 147 activist campaigns, toppling the previous record of 143 set during the first six months of 2018.
In the second quarter, 86 campaigns were launched, fueling the feverish pace. Elliott was the busiest activist, launching 11 new campaigns this year and committing some $11 billion in capital, the data showed.
While not every campaign is about board seats, the number won provides a good measure of how well companies are defending themselves. During the first half, dissidents won 74 seats, down from 93 in the same period a year ago though prominent activists put in a strong showing in reaching agreements to join boards.
In U.S. proxy fights, activists won only 11% of the seats they sought, down from 65% during the same time in 2023.
Management often persuaded shareholders that current leaders were already pursuing the right strategy and that their board directors were more qualified than the activists' nominees.
For example, hedge funds Trian Fund Management and Blackwells Capital lost their high-profile fights to seat nominees at entertainment giant Disney DIS.N and shareholders at wireless tower owner Crown Castle CCI.N rejected co-founder Ted Miller's appeal to elect him and others to the company's board.
Last year, the average activist had returns of 18%, according to Hedge Fund Research, which may have prompted newcomers to try their hand at corporate fights. Returns for the first five months of 2024, however, have been flat.
Veteran activists including Elliott, which joined the Crown Castle CCI.N board, and Carl Icahn, who was handed two seats at JetBlue JBLU.O, are still securing directorships. The Barclays data showed 24 seats were obtained by "major activist hedge funds" in the first half, compared with 29 in all of 2023.
Pushing for change at tech firms, such as Sachem Head Capital Management's success in joining the board at cloud communications firm Twilio TWLO.N this year, remained a popular trend.
But bankers, lawyers and investors also say some investors are shifting their focus to industrial companies.
Reporting by Svea Herbst-Bayliss; Editing by Edwina Gibbs
Actifs liés
Dernières actualités
Avertissement : Les entités de XM Group proposent à notre plateforme de trading en ligne un service d'exécution uniquement, autorisant une personne à consulter et/ou à utiliser le contenu disponible sur ou via le site internet, qui n'a pas pour but de modifier ou d'élargir cette situation. De tels accès et utilisation sont toujours soumis aux : (i) Conditions générales ; (ii) Avertissements sur les risques et (iii) Avertissement complet. Un tel contenu n'est par conséquent fourni que pour information générale. En particulier, sachez que les contenus de notre plateforme de trading en ligne ne sont ni une sollicitation ni une offre de participation à toute transaction sur les marchés financiers. Le trading sur les marchés financiers implique un niveau significatif de risques pour votre capital.
Tout le matériel publié dans notre Centre de trading en ligne est destiné à des fins de formation / d'information uniquement et ne contient pas – et ne doit pas être considéré comme contenant – des conseils et recommandations en matière de finance, de fiscalité des investissements ou de trading, ou un enregistrement de nos prix de trading ou une offre, une sollicitation, une transaction à propos de tout instrument financier ou bien des promotions financières non sollicitées à votre égard.
Tout contenu tiers, de même que le contenu préparé par XM, tels que les opinions, actualités, études, analyses, prix, autres informations ou liens vers des sites tiers contenus sur ce site internet sont fournis "tels quels", comme commentaires généraux sur le marché et ne constituent pas des conseils en investissement. Dans la mesure où tout contenu est considéré comme de la recherche en investissement, vous devez noter et accepter que le contenu n'a pas été conçu ni préparé conformément aux exigences légales visant à promouvoir l'indépendance de la recherche en investissement et, en tant que tel, il serait considéré comme une communication marketing selon les lois et réglementations applicables. Veuillez vous assurer que vous avez lu et compris notre Avis sur la recherche en investissement non indépendante et notre avertissement sur les risques concernant les informations susdites, qui peuvent consultés ici.
