US Justice Dept says it will inspect ship in Key Bridge collapse, signaling potential lawsuit
By Diana Novak Jones
Sept 4 (Reuters) -The U.S. government signaled in a court filing on Wednesday for the first time that it may file a claim against the owner of the ship that caused the March collapse of the Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore.
U.S. Justice Department attorney Laine Goodhue submitted a letter notifying U.S. District Judge James Bredar that the government is among the "claimants and prospective claimants” that have negotiated with the registered owner of the ship Grace Ocean and its manager Synergy Marine Group to conduct inspections and testing on the vessel before it leaves to sail to China later this month.
Bredar is overseeing claims filed against the companies following the March 26 bridge collapse.
Justice Department representatives did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Nor did a spokesperson for Synergy and Grace Ocean.
Maritime attorney Charles Simmons Jr of Whiteford, Taylor & Preston in Baltimore, who is not involved with the case, told Reuters thatit wasn’t clear from the filing what kind of claims the government could bring, but maritime law would likely limit them to recovery forfunds the federal government spent on clearing the channel after the bridge’s collapse or provided to the state for the bridge’s rebuilding.
Maryland has estimated it will cost $1.7 billion to $1.9 billion to rebuild the bridge.
The inspections and testing on the ship, which is currently in Norfolk, Virginia, are set to begin on Thursday and may continue until Sept. 14, if necessary, according to the letter. The ship is scheduled to sail to China on September 17, the letter notes.
In the early morning of March 26, the container ship, named the Dali, lost power and crashed into a support pylon, sending the Francis Scott Key Bridge into the Patapsco River and killing six people who were working on the span at the time of the crash.
Grace Ocean and Synergy filed a petition on April 1 in Maryland federal court to limit their liability from the crash to the present value of the ship and its cargo, which they estimated to be just over $43 million, according to the petition. Claimants have until Sept. 24 to come forward.
The city of Baltimore, where the bridge was located, filed the first lawsuit following the collapse. Filed in Maryland federal court in April, the lawsuit accuses the companies of negligence in operating the ship, claiming the operators left port despite an inconsistent power supply on the ship.
In May, the state of Maryland got approval to hire the Lanier Law Firm, Kelley Drye & Warren and three other law firms as it explores potential litigation over the collapse of the bridge. No lawsuit has been filed.
Últimas noticias
Descargo de responsabilidades: Cada una de las entidades de XM Group proporciona un servicio de solo ejecución y acceso a nuestra plataforma de trading online, permitiendo a una persona ver o usar el contenido disponible en o a través del sitio web, sin intención de cambiarlo ni ampliarlo. Dicho acceso y uso están sujetos en todo momento a: (i) Términos y Condiciones; (ii) Advertencias de riesgo; y (iii) Descargo completo de responsabilidades. Por lo tanto, dicho contenido se proporciona exclusivamente como información general. En particular, por favor tenga en cuenta que, los contenidos de nuestra plataforma de trading online no son ni solicitud ni una oferta para entrar a realizar transacciones en los mercados financieros. Operar en cualquier mercado financiero implica un nivel de riesgo significativo para su capital.
Todo el material publicado en nuestra plataforma de trading online tiene únicamente fines educativos/informativos y no contiene –y no debe considerarse que contenga– asesoramiento ni recomendaciones financieras, tributarias o de inversión, ni un registro de nuestros precios de trading, ni una oferta ni solicitud de transacción con instrumentos financieros ni promociones financieras no solicitadas.
Cualquier contenido de terceros, así como el contenido preparado por XM, como por ejemplo opiniones, noticias, investigaciones, análisis, precios, otras informaciones o enlaces a sitios de terceros que figuran en este sitio web se proporcionan “tal cual”, como comentarios generales del mercado y no constituyen un asesoramiento en materia de inversión. En la medida en que cualquier contenido se interprete como investigación de inversión, usted debe tener en cuenta y aceptar que dicho contenido no fue concebido ni elaborado de acuerdo con los requisitos legales diseñados para promover la independencia en materia de investigación de inversiones y, por tanto, se considera como una comunicación comercial en virtud de las leyes y regulaciones pertinentes. Por favor, asegúrese de haber leído y comprendido nuestro Aviso sobre investigación de inversión no independiente y advertencia de riesgo en relación con la información anterior, al que se puede acceder aquí.
