Victims of eBay harassment campaign can seek punitive damages, US judge rules
By Nate Raymond
Nov 1 (Reuters) -A Massachusetts couple subjected by eBay employees to a bizarre harassment campaign after an online newsletter they published drew the ire of executives can seek punitive damages on some of their claims against the company, though not some of the "most distressing" ones, a federal judge ruled on Friday.
The ruling by U.S. District Judge Patti Saris in Boston sought to clear up a legal question that the e-commerce company's lawyers said had been a sticking point in talks to settle the lawsuit by David and Ina Steiner, who it said were already seeking more than $12 million in economic damages.
Lawyers for the Steiners and eBay did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Seven former eBay workers have pleaded guilty and received sentences of as high as 57 months in prison for their roles in an extensive campaign that took place in 2019 that involved sending the Steiners cockroaches, fly larvae and a bloody Halloween pig mask, and surveilling their home in Natick, Massachusetts.
Prosecutors say the employees did so in order to silence them after senior executives deemed the Steiners' newsletter, EcommerceBytes, critical of eBay.
The San Jose, California-based company agreed in January to pay $3 million under a deferred prosecution agreement. But the company and some ex-eBay executives and employees remain defendants in a separate civil lawsuit by the Steiners.
During a hearing in July, a lawyer for eBay, Jack Pirozzolo of Sidley Austin, had told Saris that the company was seeking to settle the case but that it had become clear during discussions that they needed guidance from the judge on whether Steiners were entitled to seek punitive damages.
Under Massachusetts law, the Steiners would not be entitled to seek punitive damages against eBay. But the Steiners' lawyers, led by Andrew Finkelstein of Finkelstein & Partners, argued California law should apply to their damages claim.
Saris on Friday concluded the "most distressing conduct" underlying the Steiners' claims of trespass, false imprisonment, and Massachusetts Civil Rights Act violations occurred in Massachusetts, foreclosing the availability of punitive damages.
Those claims concerned actions by eBay employees who traveled to Natick to engage in surveillance of the couple and vandalism of their property, which the Steiners said exacerbated their fear for personal safety.
But Saris said the couple's other claims of intentional infliction of emotional distress and civil conspiracy covered not just the stalking and surveillance but also a broader range of conduct that was carried out online from eBay's California headquarters.
"California’s countervailing interest in deterring such malicious and extreme conduct by its corporate domiciles prevails since the most significant of the unlawful conduct took place within its borders," Saris wrote.
The case is Steiner v. eBay Inc, U.S. District Court, District of Massachusetts, No. 21-cv-11181.
For the Steiners: Andrew Finkelstein of Finkelstein & Partners
For eBay: Jack Pirozzolo of Sidley Austin
Reporting by Nate Raymond in Boston
Activos relacionados
Últimas noticias
Descargo de responsabilidades: Cada una de las entidades de XM Group proporciona un servicio de solo ejecución y acceso a nuestra plataforma de trading online, permitiendo a una persona ver o usar el contenido disponible en o a través del sitio web, sin intención de cambiarlo ni ampliarlo. Dicho acceso y uso están sujetos en todo momento a: (i) Términos y Condiciones; (ii) Advertencias de riesgo; y (iii) Descargo completo de responsabilidades. Por lo tanto, dicho contenido se proporciona exclusivamente como información general. En particular, por favor tenga en cuenta que, los contenidos de nuestra plataforma de trading online no son ni solicitud ni una oferta para entrar a realizar transacciones en los mercados financieros. Operar en cualquier mercado financiero implica un nivel de riesgo significativo para su capital.
Todo el material publicado en nuestra plataforma de trading online tiene únicamente fines educativos/informativos y no contiene –y no debe considerarse que contenga– asesoramiento ni recomendaciones financieras, tributarias o de inversión, ni un registro de nuestros precios de trading, ni una oferta ni solicitud de transacción con instrumentos financieros ni promociones financieras no solicitadas.
Cualquier contenido de terceros, así como el contenido preparado por XM, como por ejemplo opiniones, noticias, investigaciones, análisis, precios, otras informaciones o enlaces a sitios de terceros que figuran en este sitio web se proporcionan “tal cual”, como comentarios generales del mercado y no constituyen un asesoramiento en materia de inversión. En la medida en que cualquier contenido se interprete como investigación de inversión, usted debe tener en cuenta y aceptar que dicho contenido no fue concebido ni elaborado de acuerdo con los requisitos legales diseñados para promover la independencia en materia de investigación de inversiones y, por tanto, se considera como una comunicación comercial en virtud de las leyes y regulaciones pertinentes. Por favor, asegúrese de haber leído y comprendido nuestro Aviso sobre investigación de inversión no independiente y advertencia de riesgo en relación con la información anterior, al que se puede acceder aquí.
