Tesla faces sanctions bid in California wrongful death lawsuit
Adds comment from plaintiff's lawyer in paragraphs 6, 7
By Mike Scarcella
Oct 28 (Reuters) -The estate of a man who was killed in 2021 after his Tesla crashed and caught fire has asked a federal judge in San Francisco to sanction the electric vehicle maker over stalled efforts to settle a wrongful death lawsuit.
Lawyers for the estate of Charles Leach said in a court filing on Friday night that Tesla violated a court order by failing to send a company official with settlement authority to a mediation hearing last month.
The estate's lawyers said they reached a deal to resolve the wrongful death lawsuit for a confidential amount, but they learned hours into the September hearing that Tesla’s designee, a products liability lawyer, could not approve a settlement agreement on his own.
Tesla's actions caused the parties to breach the settlement agreement, the lawyers said. The estate asked the court to award $9,600 in legal fees as a sanction against the Elon Musk-owned carmarker.
Tesla and its attorneys did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
An attorney for the estate, Todd Walburg, on Monday said to his knowledge the settlement was no longer on the table after a deadline passed.
"This is a just case, and a grieving widow who lost her husband in a Tesla crash deserves some closure rather than having the rug pulled out from under her after a mediation," Walburg said.
Tesla has denied any wrongdoing in the case, blaming the driver for the fatal crash. A jury trial is scheduled for July 2025.
The estate's lawsuit said Leach’s Tesla Model Y “suddenly” accelerated, went off the road and slammed into a pillar at an Ohio gas station. Leach, 72, died from blunt force trauma, burns and other injuries.
“Tesla was aware that its vehicles — including the Model Y — have reportedly on hundreds of occasions accelerated suddenly and without explanation,” the lawsuit said.
Tesla has responded that Leach was solely to blame for “improper and unsafe” operation of his 2021 vehicle. The company said Leach’s model “was state-of-the-art and was not defective in design or manufacture.”
Tesla has faced other lawsuits over crashes blamed on alleged defects in its electric vehicles. Tesla last year won the first trial over claims that its Autopilot driver assistant feature led to a death.
Tesla separately faces U.S. legal and regulatory scrutiny over its driver assistance systems. In December, Tesla recalled millions of vehicles to install new safeguards.
The case is Donna Leach v Tesla, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, No. 3:23-cv-03378-SI.
For plaintiff: Todd Walburg and Scott Baez of McCune Law Group
For defendant: Sandra Ezell of Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough
Read more:
US probes Tesla's Full Self-Driving software in 2.4 mln cars after fatal crash
Exclusive - Tesla Autopilot probe, US prosecutors focus on securities, wire fraud
Tesla settles case over fatal Autopilot crash of Apple engineer
Elon Musk defeats bid to be questioned in Tesla fatal crash lawsuit
Reporting by Mike Scarcella
Activos relacionados
Últimas noticias
Descargo de responsabilidades: Cada una de las entidades de XM Group proporciona un servicio de solo ejecución y acceso a nuestra plataforma de trading online, permitiendo a una persona ver o usar el contenido disponible en o a través del sitio web, sin intención de cambiarlo ni ampliarlo. Dicho acceso y uso están sujetos en todo momento a: (i) Términos y Condiciones; (ii) Advertencias de riesgo; y (iii) Descargo completo de responsabilidades. Por lo tanto, dicho contenido se proporciona exclusivamente como información general. En particular, por favor tenga en cuenta que, los contenidos de nuestra plataforma de trading online no son ni solicitud ni una oferta para entrar a realizar transacciones en los mercados financieros. Operar en cualquier mercado financiero implica un nivel de riesgo significativo para su capital.
Todo el material publicado en nuestra plataforma de trading online tiene únicamente fines educativos/informativos y no contiene –y no debe considerarse que contenga– asesoramiento ni recomendaciones financieras, tributarias o de inversión, ni un registro de nuestros precios de trading, ni una oferta ni solicitud de transacción con instrumentos financieros ni promociones financieras no solicitadas.
Cualquier contenido de terceros, así como el contenido preparado por XM, como por ejemplo opiniones, noticias, investigaciones, análisis, precios, otras informaciones o enlaces a sitios de terceros que figuran en este sitio web se proporcionan “tal cual”, como comentarios generales del mercado y no constituyen un asesoramiento en materia de inversión. En la medida en que cualquier contenido se interprete como investigación de inversión, usted debe tener en cuenta y aceptar que dicho contenido no fue concebido ni elaborado de acuerdo con los requisitos legales diseñados para promover la independencia en materia de investigación de inversiones y, por tanto, se considera como una comunicación comercial en virtud de las leyes y regulaciones pertinentes. Por favor, asegúrese de haber leído y comprendido nuestro Aviso sobre investigación de inversión no independiente y advertencia de riesgo en relación con la información anterior, al que se puede acceder aquí.
