Ray-Ban maker EssilorLuxottica slams ‘grab bag’ lawsuits claiming eyewear monopoly
By Mike Scarcella
Oct 3 (Reuters) -Eyewear giant EssilorLuxottica has asked a U.S. judge to throw out what it called “misguided” consumer lawsuits accusing the Ray-Ban maker of monopolizing markets for designer frames and prescription lenses, causing customers to pay higher prices.
In a court filing, EssilorLuxottica on Wednesday told U.S. District Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil in Manhattan that the consumer plaintiffs had not presented enough facts to justify their claims that the company and affiliated entities were violating U.S. antitrust law.
A series of lawsuits first filed last year and later consolidated in Manhattan alleged EssilorLuxottica used serial acquisitions of rivals and restrictive sales and distribution agreements to unlawfully dominate markets for eye products.
“Their claims amount to nothing more than a contention that building a successful company over many decades is unlawful,” EssilorLuxottica’s court filing said. It added: “That is not an antitrust violation; it is good business.”
Lawyers for the plaintiffs did not immediately respond to requests for comment, and neither did EssilorLuxottica and its attorneys.
Italian eyewear giant Luxottica in 2018 merged with French lens maker Essilor in a $58 billion deal, forming EssilorLuxottica.
EssilorLuxottica owns major retail outlets including LensCrafters, Sunglasses Hut and For Eyes, and also popular eyewear brands such as Persol, Oliver Peoples, and Oakley.
Two related lawsuits seek class action status for buyers who purchased products from EssilorLuxottica and related business entities and who indirectly bought items through third-parties such as optometrists.
The plaintiffs said EssilorLuxottica had formed a web of anticompetitive agreements providing consumers only “an illusion of choice in a competition-free ecosystem.”
EssilorLuxottica captured more than half of the nearly $8.5 billion U.S. retail market for premium eyewear, the consumers alleged.
In its bid to dismiss the lawsuit, EssilorLuxottica said it and its affiliated companies operated in a highly competitive industry, and that the plaintiffs’ “grab bag” of antitrust claims failed to allege that the company was excluding potential rivals.
New market entrants like Warby Parker “have quickly built substantial eyewear businesses under their own new brands,” EssilorLuxottica said.
In re Eyewear Antitrust Litigation, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 1:24-cv-04826-MKV-GS.
For direct purchasers: Daniel Gustafson of Gustafson Gluek; David Cialkowski of Zimmerman Reed; Heidi Silton of Lockridge Grindal Nauen; and Alec Schultz of Hilgers Graben
For indirect purchasers: Richard Paul III and Laura Fellows of Paul LLP
For defendants: Christopher Yates, Belinda Lee and Lawrence Buterman of Latham & Watkins
Read more:
EssilorLuxottica extends smart glasses partnership with Meta
Ray-Ban maker Luxottica accused of anti-union behavior at U.S. Georgia plant
EU, U.S clear Essilor's 48 billion euro merger with Luxottica
Reporting by Mike Scarcella
Últimas noticias
Descargo de responsabilidades: Cada una de las entidades de XM Group proporciona un servicio de solo ejecución y acceso a nuestra plataforma de trading online, permitiendo a una persona ver o usar el contenido disponible en o a través del sitio web, sin intención de cambiarlo ni ampliarlo. Dicho acceso y uso están sujetos en todo momento a: (i) Términos y Condiciones; (ii) Advertencias de riesgo; y (iii) Descargo completo de responsabilidades. Por lo tanto, dicho contenido se proporciona exclusivamente como información general. En particular, por favor tenga en cuenta que, los contenidos de nuestra plataforma de trading online no son ni solicitud ni una oferta para entrar a realizar transacciones en los mercados financieros. Operar en cualquier mercado financiero implica un nivel de riesgo significativo para su capital.
Todo el material publicado en nuestra plataforma de trading online tiene únicamente fines educativos/informativos y no contiene –y no debe considerarse que contenga– asesoramiento ni recomendaciones financieras, tributarias o de inversión, ni un registro de nuestros precios de trading, ni una oferta ni solicitud de transacción con instrumentos financieros ni promociones financieras no solicitadas.
Cualquier contenido de terceros, así como el contenido preparado por XM, como por ejemplo opiniones, noticias, investigaciones, análisis, precios, otras informaciones o enlaces a sitios de terceros que figuran en este sitio web se proporcionan “tal cual”, como comentarios generales del mercado y no constituyen un asesoramiento en materia de inversión. En la medida en que cualquier contenido se interprete como investigación de inversión, usted debe tener en cuenta y aceptar que dicho contenido no fue concebido ni elaborado de acuerdo con los requisitos legales diseñados para promover la independencia en materia de investigación de inversiones y, por tanto, se considera como una comunicación comercial en virtud de las leyes y regulaciones pertinentes. Por favor, asegúrese de haber leído y comprendido nuestro Aviso sobre investigación de inversión no independiente y advertencia de riesgo en relación con la información anterior, al que se puede acceder aquí.
